CONSTITUTIONAL FREE ZONES

1. The Constitution-Free Zone of the United States – Bill of Rights ...

www.bisbee.net/wp/bisbee-today/the-constitution-free-.

2. Border search exception - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_search_exception

3. Do You Live In The Constitution-Free Zone Of The US? | Techdirt

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130212/0204532194...

100 Mile Constitution Exemption Zone = Loss of 4th Amendment Rights

July 11, 2014 Action Alerts, Agenda 21, Property Rights, Water Rights

We ran across something that greatly disturbed us as we were researching illegal immigration.  U.S. District Judge Korman has decided that the border — the area 100 miles inland from the entire U.S. border — falls under a “border exemption” and is being called a “Constitutional Exemption Zone”… all in the name of “national security”.  People that are in this area are subject to being stopped and searched at random.  So, our Constitutional Rights are being SUSPENDED in the 100-mile Constitutional Exemption Zone?  Does this affect EVERYONE?  What does this all mean, and to what can it lead?  What is being planned for all of us in this ‘exemption zone’?
The Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect us from unreasonable search and seizure, including arbitrary and random stops and searches.

U.S. CONSTITUTION – AMENDMENT IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Within 100 miles of the U.S. border, however, these rules DO NOT apply.
Constitutional Exemption Zones are being implemented by the Department of Homeland Security.  It appears that this federal agency isn’t really securing the borders but are extinguishing the Fourth Amendment Rights of over 197 million people within 100 miles of the border… and the ocean?
Secure The Republic is very concerned about this new “Constitutional Exemption Zone”.  What is REALLY going on?  Most of our metropolitan cities fall within this area.  2/3 of Americans (197.4 MILLION people) will be affected by this.  These people could find themselves WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.  If the 4th Amendment can be removed (the one which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures), so can the other amendments!   It appears that our borders are being eliminated and the sovereignty of our country is under attack.
This map from the ACLU is hard to beat because it shows the 100-mile “Constitutional Exemption Zone” visually, including cities which will be affected.  Take a look for yourself!  Pay special attention to the GREAT LAKES area.  We’ll comment more about that in the future…

https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights-constitution-free-zone-map

Border search exception law and legal definition  This is the Border Exception Law that is being implemented.  The power to conduct warrantless search is referenced under 8 USCS § 1357.  This is covered in the link.
Folks, this is not about border security.  Our borders haven’t been secure in MANY years.  This is about losing state sovereignty and our constitutional rights.  This includes dropping national borders. Remember, it’s a well-orchestrated plan that has been slowly coming together and will strip us of our constitutional rights.  You’ll find that proponents of these random searches and seizures make it sound good, but we need to know where their true motivation lies…  It appears to us that we are in a type of police state.
Also, study your state constitution.  You may find that it no longer describes the boundaries of your state, effectively abolishing your state.  At last check, the only states that still lay out their boundaries in their constitutions are:  Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Nevada, New Mexico, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Arkansas’ Constitution has been checked, and their boundary is found in Article I under “Boundaries”.  The description of the boundary for your state may be found in a different location than Article I in your particular state’s constitution.
When the State borders are no longer in the State Constitution, it is the signal that the State has lost its sovereignty.  WAKE UP AMERICA!  Is your state boundary being abolished?  Think about it another way:  would you buy a piece of property that has no legal definition?
In order to better understand this, you will need to obtain a copy of your present state constitution to see if your state legislature has removed the boundaries of your state.  The only way that these changes can be made is to change the state constitution and the U.S. Constitution.  The promoters of Regional Governance and a One-World Government know this.  It looks like STATE BOUNDARIES WILL HAVE TO BE ABOLISHED BEFORE REGIONAL GOVERNANCE and a ONE-WORLD GOVERNMENT CAN BE FULLY ENFORCED IN THE UNITED STATES.  Once this happens, there will be a centralization of power.  State boundaries have already been abolished in 33 of 50 states!
We wanted to make you aware of the dangers which we could face if we don’t abide by our U.S. Constitution, but you’ll need to do your own in-depth research on this topic.
So, we’d better beware of a Constitutional Convention (Con-Con) / Article V Amendment Convention / Convention of States that could rewrite the Constitution!
Be looking for more information in the future from us, and please forward this email to everyone you know!

Securing the blessings of liberty,

Secure the Republic

SecureTheRepublic.com
Info@SecureTheRepublic.com

ALL IN THE FAMILY... NOT ARCHIE BUNKER.

Totally unbelievable, how stupid do they think we are????/don't answer that, obama has been in for 2 terms........

 

DO YOU KNOW THIS (weasel) GUY? MAY 19, 2015 He is comb-over Edward “Ed” Mezvinsky, born January 17, 1937. Then you’ll probably say, “Who is Ed Mezvinsky?” Well, he is a former Democrat congressman who represented Iowa ’s 1st congressional district in the United States House of Representatives for two terms, from 1973 to 1977. He sat on the House Judiciary Committee that decided the fate of Richard Nixon. He was outspoken saying that Nixon was a crook and a disgrace to politics and the nation and should be impeached. He and the Clintons were friends and very politically intertwined for many years. Ed Mezvinsky had an affair with NBC News reporter Marjorie Sue Margolies and later married her after his wife divorced him. In 1993, Marjorie Margolies-Mezvinsky, then a freshman Democrat in Congress, cast the deciding vote that got President Bill Clinton’s controversial tax package through the House of Representatives. In March 2001, Mezvinsky was indicted and later pleaded guilty to 31 of 69 counts of bank fraud, mail fraud, and wire fraud. Ed Mezvinsky embezzled more than $10 million dollars from people via both a Ponzi scheme and the notorious Nigerian e-mail scams. He was found guilty and sentenced to 80 months in federal prison. After serving less than five years in federal prison, he was released in April 2008 and remains on federal probation. To this day, he still owes $9.4 million in restitution to his victims. About now you are saying, “So what!” Well, this is Marc and Chelsea Mezvinsky. That’s right; Ed Mezvinsky is Chelsea Clinton’s father-in law. Now Marc and Chelsea are in their early thirties and purchased a 10.5 million dollar NYC apartment (after being married in George Soros’ mansion). Has anyone heard mention of any of this in any of the media? "Hillarious" for President ! When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty. ~~ Thomas Jefferson “ America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” ~ ~Abraham

LIARS AND CON ARTISTS...

> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 11:38:53 -0500
>
>
>
> Pack of stinkin' con artists!
>
>
>
>
>
> Secretary of State John Kerry's daughter, Dr. Vanessa Bradford Kerry
> ( Kerry’s younger daughter by his first wife), married Dr.
> Brian (Behrooz) Vala Nahed , an Iranian physician in 2009.
>
>
> Brian (Behrooz) Nahed is son of Nooshin and Reza Vala Nahid of Los
> Angeles. Brian’s Persian birth name, “Behrooz Vala Nahid” is shortened
> and Americanized in the media to “Brian Nahed.” At the time of his
> engagement to Vanessa Bradford Kerry, there was no mention of Nahed’s
> Persian/Iranian ancestry, and the official wedding announcement in an
> October 2009 issue of New York Times avoids any reference to Dr. Nahed
> birthplace.
>
>
> Guess who was the best man at the wedding of Kerry’s daughter Vanessa
> and Brian Nahed. Javad Zarif’s son. Papa Zarif is the
> current minister of foreign affairs forIran. That mkes him Kerry’s
> chief counterpart in the nuclear deal negotiations.
> My, oh, my . . .
>
> American citizens are supposed to believe this deal being hawked by
> Barak Hussein Obama,negotiated by John Kerry with his son-in-law's best
> man's father, is the best thing for the USA?
>
> Nepotism: the corrupt practice among those with power or influence of
> favoring relatives or friends with special treatment.
>
>
>
> JUST IN CASE YOU QUESTION THE VERACITY OF THIS INFO:
>
> 1. Persian Shrug:
> snopes.com<http://m.snopes.com/john-kerry-iranian-son-law/> : U.S.
> Secretary of State John Kerry has hidden a close familial connection to
> the Iranian official with whom he negotiated the recent nuclear deal.
>
>
>
> Sat, 01 Aug 2015 12:40:32 GMThttp://m.snopes.com/john-kerry-iranian-son-law/
>

About Donald Trump...

> Things you may not know about Donald Trump
> :
>
> If you are really interested in who Mr. Trump is -- this is something
> that you
> should read!
>
>
> This is a bit of a read, but if you’re following the rash of
> “politicians” running for president and you’re worried about how and
> where this country is going, then this is worth a few minutes of your time!
>
> What can he do? Love him or Hate him… It is worth a read!
>
> Trump, hopefully at least, is waking some of the RINOs up. The criticisms of
> Trump are amazingly​ missing something. They are​ lacking in ​negative
> stories from those who work for him or have had business dealings with him.
> After all the employees he’s had and all the business deals he’s made
> there is a void of criticism. In fact, long term employees call him a strong
> and merciful leader and say he is far more righteous and of high integrity​
> than people may think​ and while it may surprise many, he’s actually
> humble when it comes to his generosity and kindness. A good example is a
> story that tells of his limo breaking down on a deserted highway outside of
> New York City. A middle-aged couple stopped to help him and as a thank
> you he
> paid off their mortgage, but he didn’t brag about that. Generous and good
> people rarely talk of charity they bestow on others.​ But as much as all
> this is interesting, the real thing that people want to know is what Donald
> Trump’s plan is for America. It’s funny how so many people say they
> don’t know what it is, or they act like Trump is hiding it. The information
> is readily available if people would just do a little homework. But, since
> most Americans won't do their own research, here in no particular
> order, is an
> overview of many of Trumps positions and plans:
>
> 1. Trump believes that America should not intervene militarily in other
> country’s problems without being compensated for doing so. If America is
> going to risk the lives of our soldiers and incur the expense of going
> to war,
> then the nations we help must be willing to pay for our help. Using the Iraq
> War as an example, he cites the huge monetary expense to American taxpayers
> (over $1.5 trillion, and possibly much more depending on what sources
> are used
> to determine the cost) in addition to the cost in human life. He suggests
> that Iraq should have been required to give us enough of their oil to pay for
> the expenses we incurred. He includes in those expenses the medical
> costs for
> our military and $5 million for each family that lost a loved one in the war
> and $2 million for each family of soldiers who received severe injuries.
>
> 2. Speaking of the military, Trump wants America to have a strong military
> again. He believes the single most important function of the federal
> government is national defense. He has said he wants to find the General
> Patton or General MacArthur that could lead our military buildup back to the
> strength it needs to be. While he hasn’t said it directly that I know of,
> Trump’s attitude about America and about winning tells me he’d most likely
> be quick to eliminate rules of engagement that handicap our military in
> battle. Clearly Trump is a “win at all costs” kind of guy, and I’m sure
> that would apply to our national defense and security, too.
>
> 3. Trump wants a strong foreign policy and believes that it must include 7
> core principles (which seem to support my comment in the last point):
> · American interests come first. Always. No apologies. Maximum firepower
> and military preparedness.
> · Only go to war to win.
> · Stay loyal to your friends and suspicious of your enemies.
> · Keep the technological sword razor sharp.
> · See the unseen. Prepare for threats before they materialize.
> · Respect and support our present and past warriors.
> 4. Trump believes that terrorists who are captured should be treated as
> military combatants, not as criminals like the Obama administration treats
> them.
>
> 5. Trump makes the point that China’s manipulation of their currency has
> given them unfair advantage in our trade dealings with them. He says we must
> tax their imports to offset their currency manipulation, which will cause
> American companies to be competitive again and drive manufacturing back to
> America and create jobs here. Although he sees China as the biggest
> offender, he believes that America should protect itself from all foreign
> efforts to take our jobs and manufacturing. For example, Ford is building a
> plant in Mexico and Trump suggests that every part or vehicle Ford makes in
> Mexico be taxed 35% if they want to bring it into the U. S., which
> would cause
> companies like Ford to no longer be competitive using their Mexican
> operations
> and move manufacturing back to the U. S., once again creating jobs here.
>
> 6. Trump wants passage of NOPEC legislation (No Oil Producing and Exporting
> Cartels Act – NOPEC – S.394), which would allow the government to sue OPEC
> for violating antitrust laws. According to Trump, that would break up the
> cartel. He also wants to unleash our energy companies to drill domestically
> (sound like Sarah Palin’s ‘drill baby, drill’?) thereby increasing
> domestic production creating jobs and driving domestic costs of oil and gas
> down while reducing dependence on foreign oil.
>
> 7. Trump believes a secure border is critical for both security and
> prosperity in America. He wants to build a wall to stop illegals from
> entering
> and put controls on immigration. (And he says he’ll get Mexico to pay for
> the wall, which many have scoffed at, but given his business successes I
> wouldn’t put it past him.) He also wants to enforce our immigration laws and
> provide no path to citizenship for illegals.
>
> 8. Trump wants a radical change to the tax system to not only make it
> better for average Americans, but also to encourage businesses to stay here
> and foreign businesses to move here. The resulting influx of money to our
> nation would do wonders for our economy. He wants to make America the place
> to do business. He also wants to lower the death tax and the taxes on
> capital
> gains and dividends. This would put more than $1.6 trillion back into the
> economy and help rebuild the 1.5 million jobs we’ve lost to the current tax
> system. He also wants to charge companies who outsource jobs overseas a 20%
> tax, but for those willing to move jobs back to America they would not be
> taxed. And for citizens he has a tax plan that would allow
> Americans to keep more of what they earn and spark economic growth. He wants
> to change the personal income tax to:
> · Up to $30,000 taxed at 1%
> · From $30,000 to $100,000 taxed at 5%
> · From $100,000 to $1,000,000 taxed at 10%
> · $1,000,000 and above taxed at 15%
>
> 9. Trump wants Obamacare repealed. He says it’s a “job-killing,
> health care-destroying monstrosity” that “can’t be reformed, salvaged,
> or fixed.” He believes in allowing real competition in the health insurance
> marketplace to allow competition to drive prices down. He also believes in
> tort reform to get rid of defensive medicine and lower costs.
>
> 10. Trump wants spending reforms in Washington, acknowledging that America
> spends far more than it receives in revenue. He has said he believes that if
> we don’t stop increasing the national debt once it hits $24 trillion it will
> be impossible to save this country.
>
> 11. Even though he says we need to cut spending, he does not want to harm
> those on Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security. He believes that the
> citizens have faithfully paid in to the system to have these services
> available and that the American government has an obligation to fulfill its
> end of the bargain and provide those benefits. Therefore, he wants to build
> the economy up so that we have the revenue to pay those costs without
> cutting the benefits to the recipients. He disagrees with Democrats
> who think
> raising taxes is the answer and says that when you do that you stifle the
> economy. On the other hand, when you lower taxes and create an environment to
> help businesses they will grow, hire more workers, and those new workers will
> be paying taxes that become more tax revenue for the government.
>
> 12. Trump also wants reform of the welfare state saying that America needs
> “a safety net, not a hammock.” He believes in a welfare to work program
> that would help reduce the welfare roles and encourage people to get back to
> work. And he wants a crackdown on entitlement fraud.
>
> 13. Trump believes climate change is a hoax.
>
> 14. Trump opposes Common Core.
>
> 15. Trump is pro-life, although he allows for an exception due to rape,
> incest, or the life of the mother.
>
> 16. Trump is pro 2nd Amendment rights.
>
> 17. Trump’s view on same-sex marriage is that marriage is between a man and
> a woman, but he also believes that this is a states rights issue, not a
> federal issue.
>
> 18. Trump supports the death penalty. Trump believes that there is a lack of
> common sense, innovative thinking in Washington (Hmmm… looks like he
> believes in horse sense!). He says it’s about seeing the unseen and
> that’s the kind of thinking we need to turn this country around. He tells a
> personal story to illustrate the point: “When I opened Trump National Golf
> Club at Rancho Palos Verdes in Los Angeles, I was immediately told that I
> would need to build a new and costly ballroom. The current ballroom was
> gorgeous, but it only sat 200 people and we were losing business because
> people needed a larger space for their events. Building a new ballroom would
> take years to get approval and permits (since it’s on the Pacific Ocean),
> and cost about $5 million. I took one look at the ballroom and saw
> immediately
> what needed to be done. The problem wasn’t the size of the room, it was the
> size of the chairs. They were huge, heavy, and unwieldy. We didn’t need a
> bigger ballroom, we needed smaller chairs! So I had them replaced with
> high-end, smaller chairs. I then had our people sell the old chairs and got
> more money for them than the cost of the new chairs. In the end, the
> ballroom
> went from seating 200 people to seating 320 people. Our visitors got the
> space they desired, and I spared everyone the hassle of years of construction
> and $5 million of expense. It’s amazing what you can accomplish with a
> little common sense.” On top of his saving years of construction and $5
> million in expenses, he also was able to keep the ballroom open for business
> during the time it would have been under remodeling, which allowed him to
> continue to make money on the space instead of losing that revenue during
> construction time.
>
> Donald Trump’s entire life has been made up of success and winning. He’s
> been accused of bankruptcies, but that’s not true. He’s never filed
> personal bankruptcy. He’s bought companies and legally used bankruptcy laws
> to restructure their debt, just as businesses do all the time. But he’s
> never been bankrupt personally. He’s a fighter that clearly loves America
> and would fight for our nation. Earlier I quoted Trump saying, “I love
> America. And when you love something, you protect it passionately…
> fiercely, even.” We never hear that from Democrats or even from most
> Republicans. Donald Trump is saying things that desperately need to be said
> but no other candidate has shown the fortitude to stand up and say them.
> Looking over this list of what he wants for America I see a very
> necessary set
> of goals that are long past due. Before we criticize someone because the
> media does, maybe we should seriously consider what he has to offer.
>
> P.S. added by BOB (and I agree wholeheartedly): As I see it, his main
> problem
> is his arrogance, but there's an old saying "if you can do it, it ain't
> bragging".
>

THE ENEMY WITHIN...

These are the Enemy Within!

Which 46 Senators Voted to Destroy Us ?


This agreement would have put gun control in the hands of the UN.

We came four votes away from the U.S. Senate giving our Constitutional rights over to the United Nations.

In a 53-46 vote, the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.

The Statement of Purpose from the Bill reads:

"To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty."

The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration,

would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms.

The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S.

and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry on all private guns and ammo.

Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power.

Here are the 46 senators who voted to give your rights to the U.N.

Note: ALL – (“D’s”)

If this isn’t the best argument to repeal the 17^th Amendment and put the appointment of US Senators back into the State Legislature (as opposed the popular vote); I don’t know what is. Note the states “represented” by this pack of anti-US Constitution “Senators”. CO, MN, OR, IA, ME, PA, MO, VA, LA, VT, MI, SD, NM, WI, NV, FL, WV and MT Gun Owners, their families, their friends and their neighbors; do you really believe that the residents of your state want a federal government that guts the 2^nd Amendment – NOT by the process outlined in the US Constitution but by this back-door scheme to use the UN to subvert your rights and freedoms? Consider all the other Constitutional “guarantees” in The Bill of Rights and their (your) future.

They will try this again given the opportunity or the “popular” election of their fellow travelers. Do rural American residents really want US Senators that will deny them a gun when someone kicks in the back door at 2 AM? When a rabid wolf or coyote is in the yard or on your or your neighbor’s porch? When a wolf is attacking your dog or shadowing a child at the school bus stop or on the walk to their home?

These despicable US Senators (that ratify Treaties and confirm Presidential Appointees) do NOT represent you: they represent international cabals and domestic political party politics. You CANNOT recall them and defeating their reelection with all the national and international financial/media support is all but impossible. HOWEVER, you can scare the wits out of a State Legislator that used to and who could once again appoint, re-appoint or recall these traitorous turncoats if the 17^th Amendment was repealed. US Senators should represent their State and NOT national party political platforms and/or interests or organizations inimical to the interests and welfare of the State that sends them to the US Senate.

REPEAL THE 17^TH AMENDMENT!

Jim Beers – 28 October 2013

Baldwin (D-WI)X

Baucus (D-MT)X

Bennett (D-CO)X

Blumenthal (D-CT)

Boxer (D-CA)

Brown (D-OH)

Cantwell (D-WA)

Cardin (D-MD)

Carper (D-DE)

Casey (D-PA)X

Coons (D-DE)

Cowan (D-MA)

Durbin (D-IL)

Feinstein (D-CA)

Franken (D-MN)X

Gillibrand (D-NY)

Harkin (D-IA)X

Hirono (D-HI)

Johnson (D-SD)X

Kaine (D-VA)X

King (I-ME)X

Leahy – (D-VT) X

Klobuchar (D-MN)X

Landrieu (D-LA)X

Levin (D-MI)X

McCaskill (D-MO)X

Menendez (D-NJ)

Merkley (D-OR)X

Mikulski (D-MD)

Murphy (D-CT)

Murray (D-WA)

Nelson (D-FL)X

Reed (D-RI)

Reid (D-NV)X

Rockefeller (D-WV)X

Sanders (I-VT)X

Schatz (D-HI)

Schumer (D-NY)

Shaheen (D-NH)

Stabenow (D-MI)X

Udall (D-CO)X

Udall (D-NM)X

Warner (D-VA)X

Warren (D-MA)

Whitehouse (D-RI)

Wyden (D-OR)X

Folks: This needs to go viral. These Senators voted to let the UN take OUR guns.

They need to lose their next election.

We have been betrayed.

46 Senators Voted to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N.

Please send this to SOMEONE!