Showing posts with label bomb. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bomb. Show all posts

Sunday, December 8, 2013

BRAIN CANCER, DUMB DOWN YOUR KIDS...

Microwaves, Smart Meters and the use of electronics for “mind control” *UPDATED*
i
This video is not intended to create fear, it’s purpose is to inform people about the serious nature of the electromagnetic soup we live in and to encourage people to unite in finding solutions. It’s my suspicion that many people in Congress are not aware of the dangers from microwave radiation, remember they’re sold a deceptive bill of goods by lobbyists who represent the corporations behind these technology’s. Most probably believe the spin behind the story they were told and would be horrified to know they’re exposing their loved ones to dangerous radiation.
TRANSCRIBED INTERVIEW HERE-
http://www.stopthecrime.net/Deborah%2…
Cooking of Humanity – Invisible Global Warfare
DVD HERE
http://shop.arccopy.com/DVD-Scientist…
Deborah Tavares interviews Scientist Barrie Trower
Portland, Oregon
http://www.StopTheCrime.net
October 2013
by Jim Fetzer, Barrie Trower and Deborah Taveres

For those who have wondered about the use of electronic weapons for ‘mind control’, here is a most disturbing interview of an expert, where I am publishing
portions of the transcript, which is here.
The interview was provoked by a document found on the White House website entitled, “Realizing the Full Potential of Government Held Spectrum to Spur Economic Growth”, President’s Council of Advisors on Science Technology (20 July 2012).
The complete interview may be found in the YouTube embedded below. This is about as disturbing as it gets.
Barrie Trower is a British physicist who was trained in microwave warfare by microwave experts. He looked at aspects of microwave warfare and, when he finished the time that he spent in the military, he had a lot of expertise in the microwave field and he was asked to carry on with this research. And it was a new cold war that he discovered with microwaves. Here is his personal warning in his own words:
“In the very early 1960’s I trained with the government microwave warfare establishment. I looked at all aspects of microwave warfare and when I finished my time in the military, because I had a lot of expertise in the microwave field, I was asked if I would carry on with this research. We are in a new Cold War and this is why countries are developing this. And this is why all the microwave transmitters are going up everywhere because somebody, if they wanted to, could use them for other effects. The system is up and running.
Years ago our government said to our scientists when it comes to microwaves you will only talk about things to do with heat, and that is it. So they won’t even discuss anything else. They will deny anything that doesn’t have anything to do with heat. They even deny all their 40 years of research leading up to this, although they’ve said that this can cause cancer and all the damage, they say no it can’t. We’re only looking at heat and heat is all that matters. So for the last 40 years the English government has been lying to the people. And the American, the Canadian, the Australian, they have been lying. They have been lying to protect industry, to protect their profits, to protect themselves from lawsuits.
So they are really just liars and it is provable, sanctioned by the World Health Organization,
without a shadow of a doubt. It is the same people that sit on the ICNAP certificate, sit on our
government health protection agencies, sit on the World Health Organization . . . . it is the same
people. There are probably no more than 20 of them. But, yes, they are going to, in my opinion,
commit the worst genocide this planet has ever known, not just people, but animals and plants.
They are probably going to cause more destruction than a global war, and in several hundred
years time, people will look back, whoever survives, and look at what we tried to do to stop
them.”
About gaining a foothold
Deborah Tavares: So as we go through this, Barrie, I would like for you to explain some of what you see in this document, if you would, because it’s going through thirteen pages, and they’re talking about what the purpose of the spectrum is and if we could just flip slowly each portion represents one page that is on our website.
Barrie Trower: One of the things you said, the universities, for instance, they may not be guilty. And I can give you an example. The government holds massive amounts of funds for research and the universities apply for research grants. Now to give you one example in the United States, the government asked one university if it could devise a method whereby if you beamed
microwaves into somebody’s ears the vibrational frequencies in the cochlea, they would actually produce sound in the person head so nobody else around could hear, just the one person being beamed could hear the sound.
And the University was told this would aid the deaf enormously because people could talk into a device and they would just hear it straight through. It was also picked up by the super store manufacturers who said we could also use this for good because if we have shoplifters, we can beam the pulse frequencies to the shoplifters to say, “You’re being watched. Put this down.” We’ll prevent crime, and that was used for good. It didn’t take people very long, especially the military and other super stores to think, ‘well, hang on, we can use this for our own devices’.
So the military can now put voices into people’s heads to do whatever deed they wish it to achieve, and the super stores have also realized that rather than say ‘put that down, you’re going to steal it’ , if you’re indecisive and you’re shopping, they can say ‘you really do want to buy this’, and after nine months, and I got the figure from one of your calls, somebody took one of your super stores to court for beaming them. And they made a phenomenal profit in just nine months, phenomenal profit. But because your Federal Communications Committee says that microwaves were safe, the case fell.
So all I’m saying is that when you’re reading out the universities, they may be acting totally innocently and it may be that the recipients, after the research is done, say now we will turn this to our advantage.
Deborah Tavares: And that’s because so much is compartmentalized and that’s how they keep this monster escalating to the degree that they are.
Barrie Trower: Yes. It’s perception.
About the use of “Smart Meters”
Deborah Tavares: Would you say that as far as the microwave targeting of mass populationsnow, which is what this is showing (holds White House document up), is the intention where we were talking about more specific targeted people hundreds of thousands globally?
Barrie Trower: Yes.
Deborah Tavares: Now we’re looking at a map that really does show a mass targeting particularly of the United States?
Barrie Trower: Oh yes. Absolutely. Really this is one of the ideas behind the Smart Meter where they put them on everybody’s homes. What they can do now. They can watch every single person in that house. They can watch you go to bed. They can watch what you’re doing in bed. They can watch you on the toilet and in the bath. They can hear every single word you’re saying. They have a machine which will measure your hormone levels. They have a machine, provided they’re within a 150 feet, they can measure your brain activity and they can even tell what frame of mind you’re in.
Now, if they can do this to an entire population, most people would not like it done to them but would be unaffected, and from the government point of view is, we’re really not interested in 98% of the population anyway, but we want the 2% that could be dangerous to the American citizens. But that doesn’t’ apply. They then do on to say, “Well hang on, there’s a group there that are obstructing us doing this, demonstrators. We’ll watch those.” And then you get to people of specific religions, and people with long hair, and people who smoke cannabis, and the level comes down and down and down to the point where they’re actually monitoring about 75% of the population and they have the computer
technology to do this.
Mind Control and Behavior Shaping
Deborah Tavares: Well, that is what we’re understanding is the intention of this (holding up the White House document). And what this is of course depicting is psychotronic weapons for mass mind control and about quantum computers and mind control, mind theft, and invasion of the human brain with artificial intelligence. Could you explain to people what that means.
Barrie Trower: The first thing, with this (referring to the White House document) when you blanket a whole area, there are different reasons for monitoring populations, and right now in the United States there could be to my knowledge between 40 to 45 countries blanketing people with microwaves, and all you need is a few vehicles, blanketing people with microwaves for specific purposes. Now I grew up in the Cold War era with spies, and forget James Bond or anything silly like that, the main weapon of a spy, any spy from any country, the main weapon is blackmail. That is the main weapon. Because, for instance, if I’m from a country and I want to get a spy into the United States they’re going to need documentation. To get a passport or a birth certificate or some form of documentation you need a professional person or two, like a lawyer, to sign an affidavit or something to say I have known this person since they were zero years old, they are now 22. I can identify them . . . everything.
They are a person. To get a professional person like a lawyer, if you blanket an area with microwaves, you know every conversation they’re having, you know where they go, what they’re doing. For instance, if you have a person who is a pedophile, a person who has a mistress or two, a person who is a secret alcoholic or gambler and they would lose their job if it became known, all they have to do is go up to that person and say is this is what we have on you, and you’re from another country obviously, this is what we have on you and we will give you a choice and you make your decision now. And this is what they do.
You make your decision now. Either this goes in your local press in the Sunday newspaper or you will lose your job, your children come out of university with disgrace, your wife will leave you and run away and hide, you will lose your house, everything, and you will never work again. You will be a beggar on the streets, if you’re lucky. Or you can sign this piece of paper to say you know this individual. They’re an upstanding person. They deserve the passport. They deserve a job reference because they should get this job. You’ll highly recommend that. You will sign it and we will go away. You will never see us again. Most people, given ten seconds thought, will sign and walk away and breathe a sigh of relief. That is why I suspect this, the blanketing the whole area (points to the White House document). It may not be the United States. It could be up to 40 countries. And I
can assure you there are at least 40 countries who would like to get spies in the United States. And when they’re in, they’re in. Then it goes on from there.
I don’t like the word ‘mind control’ because you don’t really control the mind. You can change it to act in a different behavior, but you do not permanently control it. You can make people do things, and that’s very easy. I could do it. I could do it to you in less than three days.
Deborah Tavares: Such as assassins?
Barrie Trower: I could turn you into an assassin in less than three days. That’s easy. So there are lots, and lots and lots of different reasons for blanketing an area and watching people. And 98% of the population probably would not be affected, but it is the fact that you have no choice. And if you upset somebody in the government, they can abuse their authority and target you.
Whistleblowers and Death Threats
Deborah Tavares: There are many scientists who realize what their scientific experiments have now caused. They’re not being used for the benefit of mankind and they now see how those are being used against their children, their families, and the world at large and they’re coming out and they’re letting this be known. And they’re not being targeted microwaves and the inventions that they’ve created are now being used against many of these whistleblowers, would you say?
Barrie Trower: Yes. And I can give you a specific example from a chief scientific officer in England. But, if you’re going to become a whistleblower you must realize first of all you’re going to receive death threats and these are very serious death threats. You are going to lose your job. Your children are not going to get a job or go to university. It is a family sacrifice, as well as yours.
I can give you an example. I’ve received many cryptic and strange messages from senior persons. I received a message from a very, very senior scientist in the top secret experimental place in England. He said, “I need to talk to you, Barrie.” I said okay and we met. He said I am going to give the perspective from where I am sitting. We have received a contract from the government to do research. I’m researching the effect of microwaves on the brain and the heart. I am one of the country’s leading research scientists. What they have asked me to do is study the brain and the heart being exposed to various microwaves, a specific pulse frequency known to affect the brain and the heart.
I know and you know, because a part of my degree was experimental physics, that if we’re going to do a study on the heart and the brain we’re looking at about 15 years. It would take about ten years to do the study and another five years to tie up the loose ends, write it, have it peer reviewed, go to publication. You and I know, because if I said to you how long would it take to do these experiments, you would say ten to fifteen years, which is what the drug companies do when they’re testing a new drug. It’s always a minimum of ten years, maybe longer. They don’t always get it right, but at least they have a go.
And he said to me there’s a lot of money involved here. Do you know how long they’ve given me to do the experiments on the brain and the heart? One of them, ten minutes and the other one is 20 or 25 minutes. I can do them both in an hour and have time for a cup of coffee. He said now I know that when I do these, the results are going to show SAFE, SAFE, SAFE, SAFE, SAFE. And I know that they are going to use this with the stamp of my laboratory to say ‘this is safe—sell it’. And this particular system has now been sold to 150 countries as safe.
And he said to me, now I’ve done nothing wrong. I did the experiments. I produced the results, which are safe, but I know this is going to be abused. I know that people are going to die because this is going to be published. Women are going to get breast cancers, miscarriages; all sorts of things are going to happen. But they’re going to do that—not me. He said now I am in a top government scientist job. I have a top salary. I have two children at university, one at college. I have a mortgage on a big beautiful house. If I spill the beans, I will lose everything today and I will never work again. My children will come out of university and my life will be a mess. What do I do? I said you only have two choices: you give up your family and your children’s university educations and everything, or you keep quiet. And those were the only two choices, and he decided to keep quiet.
Deborah Tavares: Well, of course, we know in many of these decisions the dangers beyond the family, and the fact that the family is going to be assaulted and confronted by increased frequencies anyway, as well as all of his friends and the rest of the world.
Barrie Trower: So this is the dilemma that some of the scientists are put in. So even when you read up laboratories, it may be that the scientists did nothing wrong, he did nothing wrong. He did what he was asked to do. He gave the results he was asked to give. It was the other people who are doing something wrong. But again, I’m very, very wary of reading out lists of corporations and laboratories because the people responsible may not be responsible.

Jim Fetzer, a former Marine Corps officer, is McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth.
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/10/24/microwaves-smart-meters-and-the-use-of-electronics-for-mind-control/

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

HOW TO DESTROY AMERICA ~ Ronald Reagan

We know Dick Lamm as
the former Governor of Colorado. In that context his thoughts are
particularly poignant. Last
week there was an
immigration overpopulation conference in Washington, DC., filled to capacity
by many of America's
finest minds and leaders. A
brilliant college professor by the name of Victor Hansen Davis talked about
his latest book, "Mexifornia," explaining how immigration - both legal and
illegal was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would
march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American
Dream.

Moments later, former
Colorado Governor Richard D. Lamm stood up and gave a stunning speech on how
to destroy
America.


The audience sat spell
bound as he described eight methods for the destruction of the United
States. He said, "If you
believe that America is too
smug, too self-satisfied, too rich, then let's destroy America. It is not
that hard to do. No
nation in history has
survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great
civilizations rise and fall
and that ‘An autopsy of
history would show that all great nations commit
suicide.’”


"Here is how they do
it," Lamm said.

"First, to destroy
America, turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural
country. History shows that no
nation can survive the
tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and
cultures. It is a bless-
ing for an individual to be bilingual; however,
it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar,
Seymour
Lipset, put it
this way: ‘The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not
assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy.’ Canada, Belgium,
Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which
minorities
press for
autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria
suppressed an ethnic rebellion.
France faces difficulties
with Basques, Bretons, Corsicans and Muslims."


Lamm went
on:

"Second, to destroy
America, invent 'multi-culturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain
their culture. Make it
an article of belief that
all cultures are equal; that there are no cultural differences. Make it an
article of faith that
the Black and Hispanic
dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and discrimination by the
majority. Every other
explanation is out of
bounds."

"Third, we could make
the United States an 'Hispanic Quebec' without much effort. The key is to
celebrate diversity
rather than unity. As
Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: 'The apparent
success of our own multi-
ethnic and multicultural experiment might have
been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the domin-
ance
that once dictated ethnocentrism and what it meant to be an American, we are
left with only tolerance and plural-
ism to hold us together.' Lamm said,
"I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I
would
replace the
melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure
that we have various cultural subgroups living in America enforcing their
differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their
similarities."

"Fourth, I would make
our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a
second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our
population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% drop
out rate
from high school."

"My fifth point for destroying America
would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of
money.
I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult
of 'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think that
their lack of success was
the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all
minority failure on the majority
placation."

"My sixth plan for America's downfall
would include dual citizenship, and promote divided loyalties. I would
celebrate
diversity
over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse
people worldwide are mostly engaged
in hating each other - that
is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable
society is against
most
historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation
together. Look at the ancient Greeks.
The Greeks believed that they
belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature;
and they
worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic
games. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their
liberty. Yet all these bonds
were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and
geographical condi-
tions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell.
"E. Pluribus Unum" - From many, one. In that historical reality, if
we
put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'Unum,' we will "
Balkanize " America as surely as
Kosovo."

"Next to last, I would place all
subjects off limits. Make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult
of 'diversity.' I
would
find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped
discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like
'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt
discussion and debate. Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country,
having establish-
ed multi-culturalism, having the large foundations fund
the doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible
to enforce our immigration
laws. I would develop a mantra: That because immigration has been good for
America, it
must always
be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the
cumulative impact of millions
of
them."

In the last minute of his
speech, Governor Lamm wiped his brow. Profound silence followed. Finally he
said, "Lastly, I
would censor Victor Hanson Davis's book 'Mexifornia.'
His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If
you feel America deserves to
be destroyed, don't read that
book."

There was no applause. A
chilling fear quietly rose like an ominous cloud above every attendee at the
conference.
Every
American in that room knew that everything Lamm enumerated was proceeding
methodically, quietly, darkly,
yet pervasively across the
United States today. Discussion is being suppressed. Over 100 languages are
ripping the
foundation
of our educational system and national cohesiveness. Even barbaric cultures
that practice female genital
mutilation are growing as we
celebrate 'diversity.' American jobs are vanishing into the Third World as
corporations
create a
Third World in America. Take note of California and other states. To date,
ten million illegal aliens and growing
fast. It is reminiscent of
George Orwell's book "1984." In that story, three slogans are engraved in
the Ministry of Truth building: "War is peace," "Freedom is slavery," and
"Ignorance is strength."

Governor Lamm walked back to
his seat. It dawned on everyone at the conference that our nation and the
future of this
great
democracy is deeply in trouble and worsening fast. If we don't get this
immigration monster stopped within three
years, it will rage like a
California wildfire and destroy everything in its path, especially The
American Dream.

If you care for and love our
country as I do, take the time to pass this on just as I did for you.
Nothing is going to happen
if you
don't!


"If we ever forget
that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under"
~Ronald Reagan~

Thursday, June 14, 2012

COUNTRY THINKING...


This is straight forward country thinking... 
Jeff Foxworthy on Muslims: 


1. You refine heroin for a living, but you have a                                 moral objection to liquor. 
You may be a Muslim


2. You own a $3,000 machine gun and $5,000 rocket launcher, but you can't afford shoes. 
You may be a Muslim 


3. You have more wives than teeth. 
You may be a Muslim


4. You wipe your butt with your bare hand, but                                 consider bacon unclean. 
You may be a Muslim                                 


5. You think vests come in two styles:                                 bullet-proof and suicide. 
You may be a Muslim.


6. You can't think of anyone you haven't declared Jihad against. 
You may be a Muslim.


7. You consider television dangerous, but routinely carry explosives in your clothing. 
You may be a Muslim. 


8. You were amazed to discover that cell phones have uses other than setting off roadside bombs. 
You may be a Muslim 


9. You have nothing against women                                 and think every man should own at least four.                                 
You may be a Muslim 


10. Your cousin is president of the United States .                                 
You may be a Muslim 


11. You find this offensive or racist and don't                                 forward it.
You may be a Muslim