FOUR IMPORTANT QUESTIONS

> Subject: ..BE SURE TO READ!!!! [odpositive] FW: FOUR (4) Simple
> questions from an attorney
>
>
>
> sent TO CM'S
>
>
> Importance: High
>
> From: odpositive@yahoogroups.com<mailto:odpositive@yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:odpositive@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Gordon Emmert
> netgain1@hotmail.comnetgain1@hotmail.com> [odpositive]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 10:58 AM
> Subject: [odpositive] FW: FOUR (4) Simple questions from an attorney
>
>
> FOUR (4) Simple questions from an attorney
>
> Here are 4 simple questions from an attorney.
> Are there ANY logical answers? You be the judge.
>
> Here's what I would like to know. If the TRUTH ever comes out and it is
> decided that Obama was never eligible to be president, what happens to
> all the laws he signed into being and all the executive orders? Should
> they all be null and void?
>
> Here are 4 simple questions from a reputable attorney. This really
> should get your "gray matter" to churn, even if you are an Obama fan.
>
> For all you "anti-Fox News" folks, none of this information came from
> Fox. All of it can be verified from legitimate sources (Wikipedia, the
> Kapiolani Hospital website itself, and a good history book, as noted
> herein). It is very easy for someone to check all these things out.
>
> Four Simple Questions:
>
> 1. Back in 1961 people of color were called 'Negroes’. So how can the
> Obama's 'birth certificate' state he is "African -American" when the
> term wasn't in existence at that time ?
>
> 2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama's
> birth as August 4, 1961; and lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father.
> No big deal, right? At the time of Obama's birth, it also showed that
> his father is aged 25 years old, and that Obama's father was born in
> "Kenya, East Africa". This
> wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did
> not exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama's birth, and 27 years
> after his father's birth. How could Obama's father have been born in a
> country that did not yet exist?
>
> Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the "British
> East Africa Protectorate". (check it below:)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya_%28http:/en.wikipedia..org/wiki/Kenya%29<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya_%28http:/en.wikipedia...org/wiki/Kenya%29>
>
> 3. On the Birth Certificate released by the White House, the listed
> place of birth is "Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital".
> This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called
> "KauiKeolani Children's Hospital" and "Kapi'olani Maternity Home",
> respectively.
>
> The name did not change to Kapi'olani Maternity & Gynecological
> Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this
> particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961
> if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?
> (CHECK IT BELOW:)
> (http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx )
>
> Why hasn't this been discussed in the major media?
>
> 4. Perhaps a clue comes from Obama's book on his father. He states how
> proud he is of his father fighting in WW II. I'm not a math genius,
> so I may need some help from you. Barack Obama's "birth certificate"
> says his father was 25 years old in 1961 when Obama was born. That
> should have put his father's date of birth approximately 1936. If my
> math holds (honest! I did that without a calculator!), and now we need
> a non-revised history book (one that hasn't been altered to satisfy the
> author's goals) to verify that WW II occurred basically between 1939
> -1945.
>
> Question:
> Just how many 3 year-olds fight in world wars? Even in the latest
> stages of WWII, his father wouldn't have been more than 9 years old.
>
> Does that mean that Mr. Obama is a liar, or simply chooses to alter the
> facts to satisfy his imagination or political purposes?
>
> Very truly yours,
>
> RICHARD R. SILVERLIEB
> Attorney at Law
> 354 Eisenhower Parkway
> Livingston, NJ 07039
>
> "A pen in the hand of this president is far more dangerous than a gun
> in the hands of 200 million law-abiding citizens."
> Send this to as many Patriots as you can! Ask your Republican friends
> in Washington D.C.: If they have a backbone - Why in the hell can't
> they use it and get media coverage to explode this across our country?
> Impeachment in itself is not justice! We are talking orange jumpsuit &
> long prison sentences.
>

UNBELIEVABLE ~ GOVERNMENT SPYING ON AMERICANS...

You Won’t BELIEVE What’s Going On with Government Spying on Americans

Posted on August 17, 2013 by WashingtonsBlog

New Revelations Are Breaking Every Day

Revelations about the breathtaking scope of government spying are coming so fast that it’s time for an updated roundup:

• Just weeks after NSA boss Alexander said that a review of NSA spying found not even one violation, the Washington Post published an internal NSA audit showing that the agency has broken its own rules thousands of times each year

• 2 Senators on the intelligence committee said the violations revealed in the Post article were just the “tip of the iceberg”

• Glenn Greenwald notes: “One key to the WashPost story: the reports are internal, NSA audits, which means high likelihood of both under-counting & white-washing”.(Even so, the White House tried to do damage control by retroactively changing on-the-record quotes)

• The government is spying on essentially everything we do. It is not just “metadata” … although that is enough to destroy your privacy

• The government has adopted a secret interpretation of the Patriot Act which allows it to pretend that “everything” is relevant … so it spies on everyone

• NSA whistleblowers say that the NSA collects all of our conversations word-for-word

• It’s not just the NSA … Many other agencies, like the FBI and IRS – concerned only with domestic issues – spy on Americans as well

• The information gained through spying is shared with federal, state and local agencies, and they are using that information to prosecute petty crimes such as drugs and taxes. The agencies are instructed to intentionally “launder” the information gained through spying, i.e. to pretend that they got the information in a more legitimate way … and to hide that from defense attorneys and judges

• Top counter-terror experts say that the government’s mass spying doesn’t keep us safe

• Indeed, they say that mass spying actually hurts U.S. counter-terror efforts.

• They say we can, instead, keep everyone safe without violating the Constitution … more cheaply and efficiently than the current system

• There is no real oversight by Congress, the courts, or the executive branch of government. And see this and this.

• Indeed, most Congress members have no idea what the NSA is doing. Even staunch defenders of the NSA now say they’ve been kept in the dark

• A Federal judge who was on the secret spying court for 3 years says that it’s a kangaroo court

• Even the current judges on the secret spying court now admit that they’re out of the loop and powerless to exercise real oversight

• A former U.S. president says that the spying program shows that we no longer have a functioning democracy

• The chairs of the 9/11 Commission say that NSA spying has gone way too far

• Top constitutional experts say that Obama and Bush are worse than Nixon … and the Stasi East Germans

• While the government initially claimed that mass surveillance on Americans prevented more than 50 terror attacks, the NSA’s deputy director John Inglis walked that position back all the way to saying that – at the most – one (1) plot might have been disrupted by the bulk phone records collection alone. In other words, the NSA can’t prove that stopped any terror attacks. The government greatly exaggerated an alleged recent terror plot for political purposes (and promoted the fearmongering of serial liars). The argument that recent terror warnings show that NSA spying is necessary is so weak that American counter-terrorism experts have slammed it as “crazy pants”

• Even President Obama admits that you’re much less likely to be killed by terrorists than a car accident. So the government has resorted to lamer and lamer excuses to try to justify mass surveillance

• Experts say that the spying program is illegal, and is exactly the kind of thing which King George imposed on the American colonists … which led to the Revolutionary War

• The top counter-terrorism Czar under Clinton and Bush says that revealing NSA spying programs does not harm national security

• The feds are considering prosecuting the owner of a private email company – who shut down his business rather than turning over records to the NSA – for refusing to fork over the information and keep quiet. This is a little like trying to throw someone in jail because he’s died and is no longer paying taxes

• Whistleblowers on illegal spying have no “legal” way to get the information out

• There are indications that the government isn’t just passively gathering the information … but is actively using it for mischievous purposes

• Spying started before 9/11 … and various excuses have been used to spy on Americans over the years

• Governments and big corporations are doing everything they can to destroy anonymity

• Mass spying creates an easy mark for hackers. Indeed, the Pentagon now sees the collection of “big data” as a “national security threat” … but the NSA is the biggest data collector on the planet, and thus provides a tempting mother lode of information for foreign hackers

• Mass surveillance by the NSA directly harms internet companies, Silicon Valley, California … and the entire U.S. economy. And see these reports from Boingboing and the Guardian

• IT and security professionals are quite concerned about government spying

• Some people make a lot of money off of mass spying. But the government isn’t using the spying program to stop the worst types of lawlessness

• Polls show that the public doesn’t believe the NSA … and thinks that the government has gone way too far in the name of terrorism

• While leaker Edward Snowden is treated as a traitor by the fatcats and elites, he is considered a hero by the American public

• Congress members are getting an earful from their constituents about mass surveillance

• The heads of the intelligence services have repeatedly been caught lying about spying. And even liberal publications are starting to say that Obama has been intentionally lying about spying

• Only 11% of Americans trust Obama to actually do anything to rein in spying

• A huge majority of Americans wants the director of intelligence – Clapper – prosecuted for perjury

• While the Obama administration is spying on everyone in the country – it is at the same time the most secretive administration ever (background). That’s despite Obama saying he’s running the most transparent administration ever

• A Congressman noted that – even if a mass surveillance program is started for good purposes – it will inevitably turn into a witch hunt

• Surveillance can be used to frame you if someone in government happens to take a dislike to you

• Government spying has always focused on crushing dissent … not on keeping us safe

• An NSA whistleblower says that the NSA is spying on – and blackmailing – top government officials and military officers (and see this)

• High-level US government officials have warned for 40 years that mass surveillance would lead to tyranny in America

• A top NSA whistleblower says that the only way to fix things is to fire all of the corrupt government officials who let it happen. As the polls above show, the American public is starting to wake up to that fact