Friday, April 27, 2012

63 Drone Sites in US spying on citizens




63 Active Drone Sites in USA


http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/63-active-drone-sites-in-usa/


/////




Seattle PD Insists Drones Won’t Spy on Residents
Mynorthwest.com | Seattle PD is testing out new remote controlled aircraft but claims will not use on people.
Coming to a neighborhood near you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlZGHl61YaQ

Thursday, April 26, 2012

Obama Ban on Youth Farm Chores Part of Larger Power Grab


Obama Ban on Youth Farm Chores Part of Larger Power Grab

  • The Alex Jones ChannelAlex Jones Show podcastPrison Planet TVInfowars.com TwitterAlex Jones' FacebookInfowars store
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 25, 2012
Dredging up Dickensian horrors of child labor, the Obama administration has ordered the Labor Department to apply child labor laws to family farms. The new rules would make it illegal for children to perform a large number of labor tasks that have been performed by farm families for centuries. Traditionally, adults and children alike helped with planting and harvesting in the spring and fall, but the federal government is now determined not only to make this a historical footnote, but a criminal offense.
photoChildren have worked with their families on farms for centuries. It is the reason there is now a “summer vacation” for school kids.
Under the rules, children under 18 would be prevented by the federal government from working “in the storing, marketing and transporting of farm product raw materials” and prohibited “places of employment would include country grain elevators, grain bins, silos, feed lots, stockyards, livestock exchanges and livestock auctions.”
In addition to making it far more difficult for families to work their farms, the new rules will revoke the government’s approval of safety training and certification taught by independent groups like 4-H and FFA and replace them with a 90-hour federal government training course, the Daily Caller reports.
In other words, the federal government will forcibly insert itself in the business of teaching animal husbandry and crop management, disciplines traditionally passed on by families and local communities.
Government apparatchiks will now oversee the business of local farming the same way Stalin did when he collectivized farms and “socialized” production at gunpoint in the Soviet Union. Resistance by farmers and peasants to Stalin’s efforts resulted in the government cutting off food rations, which resulted in widespread famine (the “terror-famine in Ukraine” killed around 12 million people) and millions were sent to forced labor camps.
The Labor Department’s effort to further erode the family farm falls on the heels of an unconstitutional executive order Obama issued last year establishing so-called rural councils.
“According to this new executive order, the Obama administration plans to stick its itchy little fingers into just about every aspect of rural life,” the Economic Collapse Blog noted at the time. “One of the stated goals of the White House Rural Council is to do the following….”
Coordinate and increase the effectiveness of Federal engagement with rural stakeholders, including agricultural organizations, small businesses, education and training institutions, health-care providers, telecommunications services providers, research and land grant institutions, law enforcement, State, local, and tribal governments, and nongovernmental organizations regarding the needs of rural America.
Obama’s plan to make life miserable for family farmers coincides with an effort by the United Nations under Agenda 21. Section one of the executive order mentions “sustainable rural communities,” language right out of Agenda 21. (For more on the draconian aspects of Agenda 21 and the plan to roll back modern civilization under the aegis of “sustainability,” see Rosa Koire’s Behind the Green Mask: U.N. Agenda 21.)
The federal government has recently moved to clamp down on family farms. For instance, last year the Department of Transportation proposed new burdensome rules for farmers. Incidentally, DOT Secretary Ray LaHood holds a seat on the newly created White House Rural Council.
In Late May, the DOT proposed a rule change for farm equipment, and if it this allowed to take effect, it will place significant regulatory pressure on small farms and family farms all across America – costing them thousands of dollars and possibly forcing many of them out of business,” writes Mike Opelka. “The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), part of the Department of Transportation (DOT), wants new standards that would require all farmers and everyone on the farm to obtain a CDL (Commercial Drivers License) in order to operate any farming equipment. The agency is going to accomplish this by reclassifying all farm vehicles and implements as Commercial Motor Vehicles (CMVs).”
Late last year, House Republicans moved to prevent the EPA from further burdening farmers with a rule that would ban “farm dust.” Outrage in response to the proposed regulation came fast and furious and EPA boss Lisa Jackson was forced to back down as Democrats complained that the government was not targeting small family farms with the proposed regulation.
A concerted effort by the federal government to attack small family farms cannot be denied. Infowars.com has covered dozens of efforts, including the attack on Rawesome Foods in California, numerous efforts by the feds to attack raw milk and dairy farmers (including attacks by the FDA on Amish farmers), and a recent effort by the Department of Natural Resources in Michigan to destroy open-range pig farms.
In addition to attempting to micromanage – and run out of business – family farms through federal labor regulations, the government is trying to insert itself in the relationship between parents and their children.
The ongoing attacks on family farming are not merely misguided efforts by control freak bureaucrats. They are part of a larger “comprehensive plan of action” to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations to institute “sustainable development,” a philosophy designed to bring humanity under tight control of the global elite.
As George H. W. Bush said on September 11, 1990, the plan is “based entirely on social control mechanisms.” For the elite, controlling food – especially healthy and natural food produced by family farms – is a primary objective in their plan for global conquest.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

Confiscation of GUNS - put companies out of business...



http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2874528/posts 


McMillan Firearms Manufacturing given the boot by Bank of America 
Facebook ^ | 20 Apr 2012 | Kelly D McMillan 
Posted on Friday, April 20, 2012 11:27:59 AM by Sgt_Schultze 
McMillan Fiberglass Stocks, McMillan Firearms Manufacturing, McMillan Group International have been collectively banking with Bank of America for 12 years. Today Mr. Ray Fox, Senior Vice President, Market Manager, Business Banking, Global Commercial Banking came to my office. He scheduled the meeting as an “account analysis” meeting in order to evaluate the two lines of credit we have with them. He spent 5 minutes talking about how McMillan has changed in the last 5 years and have become more of a firearms manufacturer than a supplier of accessories. At this point I interrupted him and asked “Can I possible save you some time so that you don’t waste your breath? What you are going to tell me is that because we are in the firearms manufacturing business you no longer what my business.” 


“That is correct” he says. 


I replied “That is okay, we will move our accounts as soon as possible. We can find a 2nd Amendment friendly bank that will be glad to have our business. You won’t mind if I tell the NRA, SCI and everyone one I know that BofA is not firearms industry friendly?” 


“You have to do what you must” he said. 


“So you are telling me this is a politically motivated decision, is that right?” 


Mr Fox confirmed that it was. At which point I told him that the meeting was over and there was nothing let for him to say. 


I think it is import for all Americans who believe in and support our 2nd amendment right to keep and bear arms should know when a business does not support these rights. What you do with that knowledge is up to you. When I don’t agree with a business’ political position I can not in good conscience support them. We will soon no longer be accepting Bank of America credit cards as payment for our products. 


Kelly D McMillan Director of Operations McMillan Group International, LLC 623-582-9635 www.mcmillanusa.com 


PS. Bank of America mostly owned by China...

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

CISPA abolishes internet privacy...



CISPA would obliterate any semblance of online privacy.
And it's up for a vote this week.
We need to slam Congress's phone lines to encourage lawmakers to vote no.
Please click here to find your lawmaker's phone number and place a call today.
CISPA would allow corporations to track and share all variety of information about Americans.
It would demolish existing barriers between the government and the private sector -- and between government agencies -- that restrict data sharing without cause, effectively allowing information about Americans' use of the Internet to slosh back and forth uninhibited.
It would provide the military and security agencies with broad new powers to track Americans' online activity.
We need members of Congress to oppose the legislation when it comes up for a vote later this week.
Please click here for a call script and to find your lawmaker's phone number -- we need as many calls as possible right away.
Thanks for keeping up the fight.
-Demand Progress

Don Young 202-225-5765

Thank you for calling your member of Congress -- will you take another minute to call members of House leadership? They control what bills Congress votes on.
You can tell them "CISPA would infringe on the privacy of all American Internet users. I urge you to oppose it."
House Speaker John Boehner: (202) 225-6205
House Majority Leader Eric Cantor: (202) 225-4000
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi: (202) 225-4965

Saturday, April 21, 2012

From Senator Mark Begich



April 20, 2012
HighGas Prices
Dear Alaskan:
Like you, I shudder every time I fill up my gas tank. When I was traveling around Alaska last week I saw gas prices at $4.40 in Kodiak, $4.57 in Kenai and $4.26 in Anchorage. I know prices are much higher in rural Alaska. It's a double whammy to your pocketbook when you add high home heating fuel prices.




20120420-GasPrices-2
As Alaskans, it's particularly frustrating when we see oil being developed in our own state and yet we pay some of the highest gas prices in the nation. Even though we are producing more oil and gas in the United States, we still see prices climbing. That's why I took another step last week to rein in Wall Street oil speculators whose actions add an estimated 56 cents to the price of every gallon of gas. I joined18 other senators to urge the federal court to combat excessive speculation..
President Obama this week announced his own plan to crack down on speculation. I am pushing him to go even further to help the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commissiontrack speculators and protect consumers and businesses. Our economic recovery and your family's budget can't take higher gas prices. This is an issue I will continue to stay focused on as summer approaches and your travel plans get underway.

Sincerely,
Digital Signature
Senator Mark Begich

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

It;s official. President's birth certificate a fake...


It’s official. The man sitting in the highest public office in America is an outlaw and has no legitimate claim to the White House. Any member of the House of Representatives or the United States Senate who says that Barack Obama is a legitimate office-holder should be held to account for being part of the greatest criminal conspiracy in our history. If Mr. Obama doesn’t resign before the dust settles, or if the Congress doesn’t impeach him, we will officially be living in a nation where all semblances of law and order have broken down. Barack Obama’s own attorney says his birth certificate is a forgery.
New Jersey is one of the many states where citizens have brought legal challenges to Barack Obama’s eligibility status. If Mr. Obama is not a natural-born citizen as the overwhelming majority of Americans believe, then he cannot legitimately appear on the numerous states’ ballots in the presidential race. On April 12, 2012, Alexandra Hill – the attorney for Mr. Obama in New Jersey – told the presiding judge in open court that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery.





Barack Obama's own attorney admits that this document is a forgery.
Ms. Hill, an associate attorney at Genova, Burns & Giantomasi Attorneys in Newark, told the judge that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is such a poor forgery that it should be thrown out as evidence. In other words, the fake birth certificate can’t be used to prove that Mr. Obama is not a natural-born citizen, because it is a fake birth certificate. The real one is below:














































Hospital record is on the left.








































It gets even worse. Ms. Hill then argued that the judge should not look to petty nuisances such as the United States Constitution to determine Barack Obama’s eligibility to be on the ballot. She told the judge that Mr. Obama’s political popularity is all that is necessary to determine his validity as a candidate. She also argued that the fact that he was elected once already (fraudulently) automatically places him on the ballot by default. She stated, “No law in New Jersey obligated him to produce any such evidence in order to get on the primary ballot.”


In spite of the bombshell admission, no mainstream news outlet has covered what happened at the trial yet. Judge Jeff Masin blocked the case and basically told the plaintiffs that it’s now up to the New Jersey Secretary of State to decide the issue of Mr. Obama’s eligibility. Talk about judicial courage.
Mario Apuzzo, the attorney for the plaintiffs, had this to say about the incident:

“Upon my request that she so stipulate, Obama’s lawyer agreed during the trial that there was absolutely no evidence before the court as to who Obama is or where he was born, including excluding from evidence the internet image of Obama’s alleged Certificate of Live Birth he released on April 27, 2011. The ALJ confirmed that to be the case. “
This of course creates an unprecedented Constitutional crisis. Every piece of legislation and every executive order that Barack Hussein Obama has signed is now technically invalid and possibly illegal. Since he was elected on fraudulent terms, he has no legal authority to sign bills into law. And don’t get us started on the executive orders.


Obamacare is therefore an illegal order, and cannot be enforced. The National Defense Authorization Act, which allows the executive branch to use the military to arrest conservatives without a warrant and hold them without trial, is invalid. The U.S. troops which he has sent to Pakistan, Libya, Nigeria, Uganda, Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Somalia (we’re losing track of all of them by now) and other countries for combat operations should be pulled out immediately.


He has no legal authority to do anything in the name of the people of the United States of America. Barack Hussein Obama II is an impostor and a usurper, and has no legal right to do anything from the White House. And this is by the admission of his own attorney, stated in open testimony in a court of law. What do his blind supporters have to say now, after his attorney states that the birth certificate is a forgery? Better yet, what will Congress have to say about it?

Refreshing News








President May be in Trouble              


This is probably the                   most refreshing news since Obama took office.  I hope and                   pray that it comes to pass.  


                              Obama May Be In Deep Trouble...with Chief Justice                   John
Roberts, U.S.  Supreme                   Court.

                             According to sources who watch the inner workings of                   the
federal government, a smack-down of Barack Obama by the                   U.S. Supreme
Court may be                   inevitable.

                             Ever since Obama assumed the office of President,                   critics
have hammered him on a number of Constitutional                   issues. Critics have
complained that much, if not all of                   Obama's major initiatives run
headlong into Constitutional                   roadblocks on the power of the federal
government. Obama                   certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the
Court                   when he used the venue of the State of the Union address                   early
in the year to publicly flog the Court over its                   ruling that the First
Amendment grants the right to various                   organizations to run political
ads during the time of an                   election. The tongue-lashing clearly did not
sit well with                   the Court, as demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito,                   who
publicly shook his head and stated under his breath,                   'That's not
true,' when Obama told a flat-out lie                   concerning the Court's ruling.
As it has turned out, this                   was a watershed moment in the relationship
between the                   executive and the judicial branches of the                   federal
government. Obama publicly declared war on the                   court, even as he
blatantly continued to propose                   legislation that flies in the face of
every known                   Constitutional principle upon which this nation has                   stood
for over 200                   years.

                             Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as
his                   number one enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush                   Limbaugh,
Beck, Hannity, and so on. And it is no accident                   that the one
swing-vote on the court,  Justice Anthony                   Kennedy, stated recently
that he has no intention of                   retiring until 'Obama is gone.'
Apparently, the Court has                   had enough.  The Roberts Court has signaled,
in a very                   subtle manner, of course, that it intends to address                   the
issues about which Obama critics have been screaming to                   high heaven. A
ruling against Obama on any one of these                   important issues could
potentially cripple the                   Administration.  Such a thing would be                   long
overdue.

                             First, there is ObamaCare, which violates                   the
Constitutional principle barring the federal government                   from forcing
citizens to purchase something. And no, this                   is not the same thing as
states requiring drivers to                   purchase car insurance, as some of                   the
intellectually-impaired claim. The Constitution limits                   the FEDERAL
government, not state governments, from such                   things, and further, not
everyone has to drive, and thus, a                   citizen could opt not to purchase
car insurance by simply                   deciding not to drive a vehicle. In the
ObamaCare world,                   however, no citizen can 'opt                   out.'

                             Second, sources state that the Roberts court has                   quietly
accepted information concerning discrepancies in                   Obama's history that
raise serious questions about his                   eligibility for the office of
President.  The charge                   goes far beyond the birth certificate issue.
This                   information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social                   Security
number in Connecticut , while Obama was a high                   school student in
Hawaii.
                        
                             And that is only the tip of the                   iceberg.

                             Third, several cases involving possible criminal                   activity,
conflicts of interest, and pay-for-play cronyism                   could potentially
land many Administration officials, if                   not Obama himself, in hot water
with the Court. Frankly, in                   the years this writer has observed
politics, nothing comes                   close to comparing with the rampant corruption
of                   this  Administration, not even during the Nixon years.                   Nixon and
the Watergate conspirators look like choirboys                   compared to the jokers
that populate this                   Administration.

                             In addition, the Court will eventually be forced to rule
on                   the dreadful decision of the Obama DOJ suing the state of                   Arizona .
That, too, could send the Obama doctrine of open                   borders to an early
grave, given that the Administration                   refuses to enforce federal law on
illegal                   aliens.

                             And finally, the biggie that could potentially send                   the
entire house of cards tumbling in a free-fall is the                   latest revelation
concerning the Obama-Holder Department of                   Justice and its refusal to
pursue the New Black Panther                   Party. The group was caught on tape
committing felonies by                   attempting to intimidate Caucasian voters into
staying away                   from the polls. A whistle-blower who resigned from the
DOJ                   is now charging Holder with the deliberate refusal to pursue                   cases
against Blacks, particularly those who are involved                   in radical
hate-groups, such as the New Black Panthers, who                   have been caught on
tape calling for the murder of white                   people and their babies. This one
is a biggie that could                   send the entire Administration crumbling--that
is, if the                   Justices have the guts to draw a line in the sand at                   the
Constitution and the Bill of                   Rights.

                             PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE ON YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS                   LIST!!!

                             In passing this on it is no wonder Americans of every                   race
and political persuasion are disgusted with our                   Federal Government, it
is not hard to understand the                   mistrust and the disgust. Obama and his
administration                   should be impeached and the quicker the better. Obama
only                   knows the blame game, now it is the Tea Party that caused him                   to
spend our country into debt so deep it may never                   recover. He is a
President that had a super majority in                   both houses until last
November.  And because of that                   he jammed pork barrel projects and
spending of every kind                   of an entitlement bill one can't imagine along
with Obama                   Care down our throats with spending that is                   unattainable.
He is borrowing 42 cents on every dollar we                   owe and spend, wake up
America we have become a third world                   communist                   country.


                             HOW DO YOU LIKE HIS CHANGE               NOW??