NEWS FLASH

ARCHAEOLOGY NEWSFLASH 370
Henry Kroll, this news is from Jonathan Gray
- www.beforeus.com You authorized this mailing
when you requested your gift report on our web-site.
See below for removal directions.
PLEASE NOTE: I always try to answer all email requests.
If you receive no reply it is because no person alive
sees emails addressed to info1@archaeologyanswers.com
Please resend your question to
info@archaeologyanswers.com. (info@ - not info1@)
and I promise you an answer.

"TELL ME" SHE BEGGED
Kirsty was bubbling. "I only just heard!" she exclaimed."But
I'm told you already know about this."
She crashed onto a chair and looked me straight in the eye.
"Well, what do you know about them - about those six Israelis
dressed as Levitical priests who tried to get into the chamber?"
I just looked at her. But she was not going to let go. "You've
got to tell me," she pressed. "You know, the chamber that
contains the Ark... the Ark of the Covenant. Well... what
happened to them? Were they rabbis?"
I paused for a few moments, studying her wide eyes, and wondering
how much should be revealed.
"We don’t know if they were rabbis or not," I replied. "However,
we were in Jerusalem at the time. And we had direct inter-action
with one person involved.
"The Ark of the Covenant is calculated to be 370 feet north of the
old city wall of Jerusalem - which would locate it in occupied Arab
territory.
"As you may be aware, the late Yasser Arafat had every intention
of getting Jerusalem back, including this area. And the U.N. and
the United States seemed to be intent on forcing Israel to
accept that situation.
Well, it seems the Israeli authorities wanted to move the Ark of
the Covenant out of occupied territory, into their own territory.
So, reportedly, they allowed or arranged for six men, who were
dressed in the ancient Levitical garb, to go in and move the Ark."
YOU DON'T ASK TOO MANY QUESTIONS
This is a rather sensitive issue, I explained to Kirsty.
In fact, in matters like this you don't ask too many questions.
One learns from experience that it's best not to get too nosey.
To put you, as well as Kirsty, in the picture, my wife Josephine
and I had arranged to meet our archaeologist friend Ron in
Jerusalem.
However, on this occasion he was delayed in Nashville, Tennesseee,
due to a minor operation. Our schedule demanded that we fly out
before he arrived.
On visits to Israel, Ron has quite often stopped by the
Antiquities office and asked if there was anything he could help
them with.
He had some electronic equipment and some experience using it,
so our team was able to help find things that they sometimes had
problems locating.
With electronics, one can, for example, see if there is something
in a cave, before going to the bother of opening it. So the
Antiquities guys have had the team do some of this.
On this particular occasion they just said, “Well, yes, we do
have a problem you can help us with.”
So that night Ron was to meet them down at Zedekiah’s Cave.
They went in. Once inside the cave, at the entrance to the tunnel
that goes north, they stopped.
WHAT HAPPENED TO THEM?
The Antiquities men announced: “Six men went down this tunnel to
move the Ark to a safer place. And they didn’t come out. Would you
go see what happened to them?”
Well, the Israelis are not cowards, by any stretch of the
imagination.
As it was, the six missing men who entered the tunnel had
walkie-talkies (two-way radios). Undoubtedly they were in contact
with others at the entrance to the tunnel.
We can only surmise that they must have made some horrifying
noises as they died. Otherwise some people would have gone in to
see what happened to them. Nobody would go in.
Well, when Ron went in, there were the six men, all dead.
From the beginning of the tunnel in Zedekiah’s Cave to the
actual chamber containing the Ark of the Covenant is an estimated
370 feet (about 114 meters).
The six men had progressed approximately 70 feet (21 meters)
along the tunnel when they died. All of them died of stroke.
In my subsequent investigation of the event, I was informed that
every one of them was found with both eyes crossed – which a
medical doctor assured me was evidence of a bilateral stroke (
a stroke occurring on both sides of the body).
This allegedly befell all six of them.
Anyway, when Ron saw what had happened, he went back out and told
the Antiquities guys.
They had brought along some rescue baskets made of light-weight
alloy, with ropes tied to them, in case Ron was able to go in.
So he took a basket, and picked up the bodies one at a time, and
put them in the basket, holding it upright, as the men at the
tunnel entrance pulled the basket out.
When they got one to the entrance of the tunnel, Ron took another
one, then went back and did another, until they got all six of the
bodies out.
Ron didn’t ask what they did with them. He didn’t ask anything. He
was asked not to say anything.
But this did appear in a couple of newspapers – that there had been
six Israelis who had died in an effort to retrieve a national
artefact.
Because it was in the papers, some folk have asked if we knew
about it. The answer, of course, is yes. For this reason I have
shared the above information.
This incident may remind you of some Old Testament accounts in
which unauthorised men who approached, touched or looked into
the Ark dropped dead.
So apparently, nothing has changed. The Ark remains a very sacred
object. And if you ask me, it will remain where it is and no one
will move it.
WALKING ON A KNIFE EDGE
Of course, as you are aware, Israel today is on tenterhooks. The
government is nervous. It does not want war. Neither do most of
the people, whether Israeli or Arab.
But it is against this background that we must view the current
official attitude toward the reported Ark of the Covenant
discovery. You won't get them to admit much.
Whatever way you view it, that ancient golden chest from Solomon's
Temple is potentially the most explosive object on earth…
archaeologically, politically and religiously.
The barrier of silence should not surprise us. In virtually every
country, official denials of numerous matters are standard
procedure. And in such cases, almost all personnel even in the
department concerned are kept in the dark.
CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE
A classic example of the denials policy in action was seen in
April, 1995, after Channel 7 radio in Israel broke the news
that Foreign Minister Shimon Peres had met with the Pope with
a proposal to place the Old City of Jerusalem under Vatican
control.
Israel's ambassador in Rome, Shmuel Hadas, and Peres himself,
denied such a plan.
However, a copy of a telegram sent by Miriam Ziv to the Foreign
Ministry in Jerusalem, outlining Peres' planes, surfaced and
was printed in the "Hatzofe" newspaper.
Former Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir told the "Jewish Press"
that:
"This is similar to Peres' denial that there was ever a letter
with promises to Arafat about Jerusalem and later the letter
surfaced. Now this telegram was revealed. Who knows what else
they are concealing from the public?" (Issue of April 14-20,
1995)
IT'S TIME TO SPEAK UP
Anyway, Henry Kroll, something has to be told. So, after much
consideration, I'm about to rip apart a curtain of silence about
the Ark.
Yes, yes... I know. The Ark's been reported in Ethiopia...
in Jordan... in Egypt... and a dozen other places.
Indeed, there have to be replicas. But originals? There can be
only one. And that's what we're talking about.
You won't want to miss this incredible true story.
Here are revealed the down-to-earth inside secrets about a lost
treasure... a dangerous search... and an almost unbelievable
discovery claim.
And yet, when you face all the strands of evidence, what else
could it be?
I'll take you along a trail of archaeological surprises, through
forgotten history and right up until now.
Why did an Israeli ex-Secret service agent say to me, "you have
just filled in the missing gaps in what I already knew"?
What sinister secret associated with the Ark is being covered
up?
You can go here to see more:
http://www.beforeus.com/aoc.html
Thanks for patiently bearing with me.
Warm regards,
Jonathan Gray
info@archaeologyanswers.com

Jonathan Gray post.

ARCHAEOLOGY NEWSFLASH 340
Henry Kroll, this news is from Jonathan Gray
- www.beforeus.com You authorized this mailing
when you requested your free report on our web-site
or a friend enrolled you. See below for removal
directions.
PLEASE NOTE: I always try to answer all email requests.
If you receive no reply it is because no person alive
sees emails addressed to info1@archaeologyanswers.com
Please resend your question to
info@archaeologyanswers.com. (info@ - not info1@)
and I promise you an answer.

SCIENTIST FORCED INTO A U-TURN
"We've made an awful mistake!"
Dismay was in Dean's voice. "A student has knocked
our theory to bits!"
Dr Dean Kenyon, Professor of Biology (Emeritus) at
San Francisco State University, was one of the
leading chemical evolution theorists in the world.
He co-authored "Biochemical Predestination", which
claimed
1. that the evolution of life was inevitable…
2. that proteins to produce living cells were formed
directly by forces of attraction between their parts…
3. that proteins are just formed together (self-assemble)
in chains, directly from amino acids, without any DNA
assembly instructions.
His theory was accepted with enthusiasm by the
evolutionary scientific community. But within just five
years after publishing, Kenyon suddenly had serious
doubts.
It began when one of his students asked, “How could the
first proteins have been assembled without the help of
genetic instructions?” (Proteins were the necessary
information to build the first cell.)
And then DNA was discovered. This would prove fatal to
Kenyon’s molecular evolution theory. Kenyon confesses,
“The more I conducted my own studies, including a period
of time at NASA-AIMS Research Center, the more it became
apparent there were multiple difficulties with the
chemical evolution account.
“And further experimental work showed that amino acids
do not have the ability to order themselves into any
biologically meaningful sequences.
“The more I thought about the alternative that was
being presented in the criticism, and the enormous
problem that all of us who had worked on this field
had neglected to address, the problem of the origin
of genetic information itself, then I really had to
re-assess my whole position regarding origins.”
(Unlocking the Mysteries of Life)
What he now had to address was this: What was the
source of the biological information in DNA?
“If one could get at the origin of the messages,
the encoded messages within the living machinery,
then you would really be onto something far more
intellectually satisfying than this chemical
evolution theory.”(Ibid.)
The astonishing fact is that inside every
microscopic-sized cell, machines work together to
accomplish specific jobs and are shepherded by
other specially shaped machines to precise locations
where they are needed.
Learning this, Kenyon exclaimed, “This is absolutely
mind-boggling, to perceive at this scale of size,
such a finely tuned apparatus, a device, that
bears the marks of intelligent design and
manufacture!”
OBSERVABLE EVIDENCE OF A MASTER DESIGNER
This is observable evidence of thoughtful, programmed
designing by some Superior Mind. Evidence of
intelligently organized patterns.
MUSIC IN GENES
Something else. Did you know this? It was recently
discovered that DNA is linked to music!
If you like music, but think that you can’t carry a
tune, you may be wrong.
Respected geneticist, Susumo Ono, believes he’s
discovered music in genes– particularly human genes,
fish genes and rabbit genes. Susumo is a researcher
in DNA.
He asked himself, If we were to assign a musical note
to each chemical on the DNA strand and string those
notes together and play them, what would DNA sound
like?
So he did this – and the result was amazing.
He discovered musical patterns of notes, that again
reveal intelligence.
Susumo Ono was so astonished that he took his
findings to musicians.
And musicians, in turn, were astonished to hear
echoes of Bach, of Schubert, of Mozart in DNA
music.
Using the same formula for converting DNA into
music, Dr Ono worked backwards and translated
Chopin's funeral march into chemical symbols. It
came out cancer!
Skeptics naturally point out that these strands
of DNA produce only a string of single notes; it
is the musicians who fill in the rhythm and the
harmony.
But the bottom line is this: Whichever way you
look at it, the PATTERNS of single notes testify
to intelligence as the source of DNA.
Certainly it is not from a blind, accidental force
in nature.
IDENTICAL TO WRITTEN LANGUAGE
But there’s more, much more.
Scientists at Bell Laboratories conducted studies
on the mathematical language in the DNA molecule.
And what did they find? Its mathematical pattern
is identical to that of conversational language.
Concerning DNA, Charles Thaxton states:
“A structural identity has been discovered between
the genetic message on DNA and the written messages
of a human language.” (Charles Thaxton, “A New
Design Argument,” Cosmic Pursuit 1, no. 2, Spring
1998)
Hupert Yockey explains:
“There is an identity of structure between DNA
(and protein) and written linguistic messages.
“Since we know by experience that intelligence
produces written messages, and no other cause is
known, the implication, according to the abductive
method, is that intelligent cause produced DNA and
protein.
“The significance of this result lies in the security
of it, for it is much stronger than if the structures
were merely similar.
”We are not dealing with anything like a superficial
resemblance between DNA and a written text.
”We are not saying DNA is like a message. Rather, DNA
is a message. True design thus returns to biology.”
(Hubert P. Yockey, “Journal of Theoretic Biology”)
Since there is no doubt in anyone’s mind it takes
intelligence to write a language, it is evident that
it took intelligence to write the DNA code.
INTELLIGENTLY DESIGNED ‘SENTENCES’
IMPRESSED FROM THE OUTSIDE
Dean Kenyon was asked if DNA comes in intelligently
designed ‘sentences’.
INTERVIEWER: “And is it true that when scientists
peer into the microscopic world of DNA, they find
not mere random arrangements, but well-written
‘instruction books’?”
KENYON: “Yes. Masterpieces of immense intricacy and
subtlety.”
INTERVIEWER: “And you argue that these biological
‘sentences’ in DNA could not have arisen merely by
material means, as evolutionists suggest?”
KENYON: “No. Just as the chemistry and physics of ink
and paper do not determine the order of symbols in a
printed text, but that order must be impressed on the
ink from the ‘outside’, so also the order of the
bases, or sub-units, in DNA [adenine, thymine, guanine,
and cytosine, or A, T, G, and C as commonly represented]
is not determined by the known chemical tendencies of
these individual sub-units, but instead appears to have
been impressed from the ‘outside’ on the sub-units to
create just those sequences that make biological sense.
The fantastic complexity and orderliness of the DNA code
– condensed into an incredibly tiny size – suggests the
work of a brilliant intellect rather than chance
processes.
It suggests that much thought has gone into their design
– just as human beings use intelligence to design and
construct computers, Jumbo jets, space craft and other
intricate equipment.
If radio signals were to be received from outer space,
they would be understood as evidence of an intelligent
source.
Why then should we not regard the message sequence on
the DNA molecule as prima facie evidence of an intelligent
source?
DESIGNED NOT TO EVOLVE
But that is not all! Gene code letters have built in
error protection!
Genes store information in long strings of DNA, in the
form of chemical letters, called A, T, C and G.
So that genes can be accurately copied, each gene
consists of two parallel strands of DNA held together
by links between the code letters of one strand and
those of the other strand.
The two strands are not identical. That is, A’s do not
link to A’s, and so on.
Instead, they are complimentary. A’s always link to T’s;
C’s always link to G’s.
Donail MacDonaill of Trinity College, Dublin, studied
that pattern of linkages between letters.
And he found that they form a parity code similar to
computer codes, to minimise mistakes during the
electronic transfer of information. (Nature science
update, www.nature.com/nsuSeptember 18, 2002)
Now is the moment of truth. No one would be so naïve as
to believe modern electronic parity codes could have
evolved by chance. They were carefully planned by
software designers.
The parity code found in DNA is further evidence the
genetic code was deliberately created.
It also reminds us that DNA is designed to maintain
accurate copies and avoid changes in the information
it carries.
This means it was designed to NOT evolve. But rather
to reproduce its own kind forever.
Come to think of it, wouldn't that make evolution
scientifically impossible?
WARNING:
PREPARE YOURSELF FOR SOME SHOCKS
In all the 8 years since I began sending out this
newsletter, seldom have I gone public with such
explosive information. I know some people who just
can’t handle this.
This "FEARSOME FOURSOME" of cover-up secrets will
ANGER and SHOCK many people – but it has to come
out now. I can hold back no longer.
If you love TRUTH, you will be glad these explosive
facts are OUT AT LAST!
When you see this information you will agree – some
of it is pure ANCIENT ARCHAEOLOGY DYNAMITE. And some
is CONTEMPORARY, PRESENT DAY NUCLEAR-POWERED INFORMATION.
It is stuff that some people kill for – literally!!!
Here's where to go:
http://www.beforeus.com/coverup.php
Thanks again for being on my newsletter list.
Take care,
Jonathan Gray
info@archaeologyanswers.com
------------------------------------------------------
Please tell your friends
------------------------------------------------------
Have you been enjoying the archaeology newsletters?
If you know someone who would find these facts
interesting, Click the URL below now to tell them,
or copy and paste the URL below into your browser.
http://www.beforeus.com
======================================================
If you have any questions, please email me at
info@archaeologyanswers.com
======================================================
International explorer, archaeologist and author
Jonathan Gray has traveled the world to gather data on
ancient mysteries. He has penetrated some largely
unexplored areas, including parts of the Amazon
headwaters. The author has also led expeditions to the
bottom of the sea and to remote mountain and desert
regions of the world. He lectures internationally.
======================================================
If you have received this mailing in error, or
do not wish to receive any further newsletter
mailings from us, simply click "Reply" and type
in the SUBJECT LINE "unsubscribe" to
info@archaeologyanswers.com