GOV: "PEOPLE ARE CORPORATIONS"

Subject: FW: CARPOOL LANE TICKET DEFENSE TO BE TESTED TODAY

Lengthy head notes notwithstanding, the SCOTUS found that corporations are "persons," not people. The same is true of U.S. citizens because they, like corporations, are legal fictions. sj

Man Uses Traffic Ticket to Challenge Supreme Court's Citizens United Decision: “Actually, Officer, I Have a Certificate Of Incorporation In the Glove Box, So the Two Of Us ‘People’ Should Be Allowed To Drive In the Carpool Lane”

A hearty congratulations this morning to one Jonathan Frieman of San Rafael, California. We realize it’s only January but as far as we’re concerned this Frieman guy has already won the entire year of 2013 for executing a rather brilliant prank on the textualist wing of the Supreme Court.

His plan was as simple as it was brilliant: Frieman just drove around in one of California’s carpool lanes by himself until he eventually was stopped by police for not having an additional person in the car. (Sidenote: Apparently carpool laws are enforced rather loosely in California. It took Frieman over 10 years of driving around like that before he was finally ticketed.)

Once Frieman was finally pulled over, he handed the officer a certificate of incorporation and voila!! According to the Supreme Court’s own precedent, Frieman suddenly had two “people” in his vehicle. Obviously, the officer still gave him the $481 ticket, so today Frieman is heading to traffic court to argue his case.

While Frieman says he has long opposed the legal community’s treatment of corporations as people, his carpool prank is particularly relevant to the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which expanded this construct even further. The Court in that case decided that corporations have the same speech rights as humans under the law, and therefore these corpo-people-hybrid-monsters are allowed to spend as much money as they want to influence elections.

Just in case this doesn’t sound completely insane to you already, keep in mind that the five justices who signed onto the majority in that case are the exact same guys who constantly accuse their more liberal colleagues of twisting around the meanings of words in order to suit their personal agendas. For instance!! In Citizens United, the liberal justices twisted around the meaning of “person” to mean “person” and somehow found that the word ”speech” means “speech.” The textualists, on the other hand, simply looked at the plain meaning of these words and decided that ”person” includes “corporations” and “speech” is the same thing as “money.” Therefore, limiting the amount of cash that, say, Exxon Mobil can spend to influence an election is just as much of a violation of the First Amendment as punishing an actual human being for writing a disagreeable blog post.

Well okey-doke then, Supreme Court! In that case, we’ll be slipping Wells Fargo some roofies so we can get ourselves preggers and collect some serious child support. (Technically Wal-Mart brings in more cash than Wells Fargo but we’re a little too classy for that. )

Anyway, assuming the police officer actually shows up at the traffic court today, the judge will be either need to: (a.) rule that, duh, obviously a corporation is not a person so articles of incorporation don’t count as an additional passenger; or (b) stand by the Supreme Court’s definition of a corporation and therefore publish a totally ludicrous decision holding that people can just strap their corporate documents into the front seat of their vehicle in order to ride in the carpool lane. Either way, hilarity and further appeals are sure to ensue.

http://www.newsforage.com/2013/01/man-uses-traffic-ticket-to-challenge.html

-- 
CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 3527.  The law helps the vigilant, 
before those who sleep on their rights.

"A statute does not trump the Constitution." 
People v. Ortiz, (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th at p. 292, fn. 2 
Conway v. Pasadena Humane Society (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 163
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JERRY ARBERT POOL, C.A. No. 09-10303, 
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 
(Opinion filed September 14, 2010), On Appeal From The United 
States District Court For The Eastern District of California

A statutory privilege cannot override a defendant's constitutional 
right.  People v. Reber, (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d. 523 [223 Cal.Rptr. 
139}; Vela v. Superior Ct, 208 Cal.App.3d. 141 [255 Cal.Rptr. 921], 
however, "the judiciary has a solemn obligation to insure that the 
constitutional right of an accused to a fair trial is realized.  If 
that right would be thwarted by enforcement of a statute, the state
...must yield." 
Vela v. Superior Ct., 208 Cal.App.3d. 141 [255 Cal.Rptr. 921

Obviously, administrative agencies, like police officers must obey 
the Constitution and may not deprive persons of constitutional rights.
Southern Pac. Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Com., 18 Cal.3d 308
[S.F. No. 23217. Supreme Court of California. November 23, 1976.]

If evidence of a fact is clear, positive, uncontradicted and 
of such nature it cannot rationally be disbelieved, the court 
must instruct that fact has been established as a matter of law. 
Roberts v. Del Monte Properties Co., 111 CA2d. 69 (1952)

If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to 
worry about answers.
Thomas Pynchon

They will do whatever we let them get away with.  
Joseph  Heller

-- 
Have a great day 
Sir Richard James, McDonald 
KNYAZ Cte MKSJ KOC KR PhD JD LLD

He has made Judges dependent on his Will
alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount 
and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither 
swarms of Officers to harass our People, and eat out their
substance
The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the 
extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the
citizenship to the agencies of government.
City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944
Sir Richard James, McDonald
http://www.state-citizen.org/
Jitsi address  rjmcd
Skype address  rjmcd1
Brosix address rjmcd1 (Skype replacemnt)
Join our Citizenship Educational program
(818) 703-5037 voice

Important! US is a foreign owned corporation...

The Corporation Of The United States Of America Is It True? We Are Not Under Common Law?

Ads by Google

LLC in 3 Easy Steps www.LegalZoom.com/LLC

(1) Sign Up (2) Fill in Online Form (3) Launch Your New Business!

Effective Divorce Lawyer www.dhpfirm.com

30+ years in Alaska. Quality Services - Reasonable Fees

Ask a Lawyer Online Now Law.JustAnswer.com

A Lawyer Will Answer in Minutes! Questions Answered Every 9 Seconds.

Preamble of the Original Constitution

"We the People of the United States , in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

An Excerpt from the Declaration of Independence

"We hold these truths to be self-evident. That all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government , laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness."

The Corporation Of The United States Of America

We Are Free!

Every year it comes and goes, Independence Day, the Fourth Of July. It is a celebration that occurs every year in every town and city in the country. We line up on Main Street to watch parades. We gather in fields to watch firework displays.

What are we celebrating?

The formation of the country?
The anniversary of a document?
NO!
We are supposed to be celebrating the very thing that this country stands for. Freedom!
"We Are Not FREE!" The truth is that we have not been free people for a very long time.
The day is designated as a time to honor our "Independence". A celebration of free people living in the land of Liberty. We listen to songs of the magnificence of our Nation, we hang our flags in a joyous, patriotic, euphoria. In reality there are not many Americans that have the consciousness that they are in fact, not Free.
This is an illusion that the entities which control our Country immortalize to avoid the People from coming to the awareness of the truth. It allows them to keep the population under the combative control of a global conglomerate of corporate control.
The Freedoms that we have lost, we have given up willingly through lack of education and apathy. Allowing ourselves to be distracted by baubles and shiny objects like children. We the People did not know how to maintain our Freedoms, or how they could be taken from us. Our Forefathers had no way to grasp what the future would hold for us.

I Have Constitutional Rights!

Those in denial will immediately shout about the document known as the Constitution. Our Constitution is the representation of liberty for the people. It symbolizes the Representative form of government that is no longer in existence within the United States of America.
The Constitution is dead and our representative republic has been replaced with a democratic central government that is rampantly corrupt. The saddest part of this fiasco is that most Americans will never know or realize exactly what it was that they lost. The people are unable to see the deceit which replaces the actual truth. They will never pull the curtain aside to see the manipulators for what they are.
To begin to gain knowledge of the truth we need to start to understand what happened to our representative republic, it all started shortly after the ending of the hostilities known as the American Civil War. It was in the year 1871 that the deterioration and elimination of our representative republic was introduced.
Let us delve into the actual history of our Republic, the truth that the government does not want the People to be aware exists!

An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia

The Cause

Our nation went through a transformative event following the conflicts of the Civil War. The country had used all its credit and wealth on funding the war. It was in essence Bankrupt!
Through some fancy maneuvers done by International Bankers, European Interests put a yolk of debt and servitude on the American people. The Civil War had been financed and fought to put the young country under such a stranglehold. Simply to be able to use the energy, time, and labor of the population for its own greedy interests.
On the day of February 21, 1871 with the Forty-First Congress in session an Act was passed*. The title was "An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia" also known as the "Act of 1871."
This Act stated that Congress, which it had no constitutional authority to do, created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, which in reality is only a ten mile square piece of land.

The Swindle

The Congress knew that our country was bankrupt, so they made an arrangement with the International Bankers to run up a Debt to these Foreign Banks ( the Rothschilds of London were investing in many enterprises Globally).
One thing that everyone knows about banks is that they do not lend money simply to be kind. The only way that a Bank would enter into a contract is if it would benefit the Bank. Some kind of Collateral, or some kind of scheme that would put the population into servitude to the Banks would be necessary.
The sneaky and manipulating International Bankers would not lend money to our financially troubled nation without some stipulations. They came up with a devious scheme to gain control over the country that they had desired for a long time. The Founding Fathers detested these Foreign Entities and kept them at bay until the Act of 1871 was passed.
The Act formed the Corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. It is the capitalization that is important. This Corporation which was owned by Foreign Entities immediately did away with the original Constitution.
The Act of 1871 changed our Constitution. The title was Capitalized and the word "for" was changed to the word "OF" in the title.
"The Constitution for the united states of America" was written by the Founding Fathers. The international bankers had it changed to "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA".

Corporate Constitution

It may look the same but it is not the same. The Corporate Constitution works on an economic level. It is used to trick the People into thinking it is the same Constitution for the Republic.
IT IS NOT!
CAPITILIZATION, not important?
When dealing with a Legal Document it is very important. These small changes has had a direct impact on every generation born under its inception. When Congress passed the Act of 1871 it created an entirely new document. The new document would be a Constitution for the government for the District Of Columbia.
The government that was formed was a Corporation. This new and improved Constitution is not a document for America. It is a Constitution for the Corporation.
Was this done in the best interest of the Nation?
NO!
The Corporate Constitution is not for the good of the Republic, it is for the good of the Corporation. It does not benefit the populace of the country and it operates outside the parameters of the original Constitution.
Instead of guaranteeing your rights it offers you privileges. For example: Sovereign's right to travel, which under Corporate Government Policy has been changed into into a "privilege" and a license is required. This is in violation of the original Constitution.
By doing such a horrendous act Congress committed Treason against the People. Under the Declaration of Independence and the original Constitution the people were considered Sovereign Individuals.

What Is a Sovereign?

Before we discuss "Sovereign," let us try to figure out what it means.
Webster's Dictionary defines "sovereign" as:
1. chief or highest; supreme.
2. Supreme in power, superior in position to all others.
3. Independent of, and unlimited by, any other, possessing or entitled to, original and independent authority or jurisdiction.
The government of the United states of America was created by and for "sovereigns". The free people who were citizens of the country were deemed the highest authority. Only the People can be Sovereign. The Government cannot be sovereign. It can also be found in the Declaration of Independence, where it says "government is subject to the consent of the governed". That is the People in other words, us, the sovereigns.
Do you feel like a sovereign?
It does not take a constitutional scholar to see out that this is not the way it is in the country today. Government today does not seek or require the consent of those who are governed. It is more like the governed serve at the beckon call of the CORPORATION.
The same Corporation that has reached beyond the ten square miles assigned to it. The Corporation of the District of Columbia which is now infringing on the rights of the states. There is no jurisdiction for the corporation outside of its little ten miles of influence.

Ignorance of the law is NO excuse!

You Should Know The Law!

There is a presumption that every citizen should be aware of the law. This just seems a little unreasonable considering we are not taught anything about the law in school. Instead they make us memorize little facts and sayings. we are taught the Preamble, but the education system ignores the Bill Of Rights.
The Corporate Government Schools completely ignore the Law. Nor do they delve into the Constitution very deeply. The Corporate school system is not set up to provide a usable education, they are in place to indoctrinate and dumb down the population.
Nobody will tell you that your country was sold to Foreign Entities. Nor will they tell you that the people have inherited the debt incurred by Congress to International Bankers. Generations of American people have had their wealth confiscated to pay a debt that they, the People, did not incur.
Think about how the government has changed from a Municipal Entity into a Corporate Entity the next time you hear someone say the Constitution is no longer relevant. We are living a lie, we are being ruled by an unlawful government.

Roman Civil Law and Admiralty/Maritime Law

The Act of 1871, once passed created the illusion of Freedom. Congress willingly and knowingly sold out the American People and The Nation to Foreign Interests. The deceit was complete. This treasonous act brought the nation to its knees. Once the People were forced to surrender their Gold in 1933, the betrayal of the Republic was complete.
This is just a copy of Roman Civil Law, our Government is now based on Roman Civil Law and Admiralty/Maritime Law. Some other descriptions are "Divine Right of Kings" and "Law of the Seas".
Roman Civil Law was initiated into the colonies when the charters were written. Long before we ever existed as a Nation. This is also known as "Private International Law.

US is a Corporation, not a Country. Got a problem with that?

Private International Law, and not Common Law

The Constitutional Republic, which was created by the Original Constitution had Common Law as the law of the land. The District Of Columbia has a Government which was established by the Act of 1871, it uses Private International Law instead of Common Law.
A very important point to make is that Private International Law only can be utilized in the District Of Columbia. It is not supposed to be applicable within any of the States of the Union.
The Corporation is divided into different departments Justice Department, Treasury Department etc... People think these Departments are part of the Country.
Wrong!
These departments are all part of the CORPORATION Of THE UNITED STATES.**
They do not answer to the People under the Corporate Constitution and its Amendments operate outside the Original Constitutional Republic.
Do not think that the Corporation Of The United States is separate from the government. The Corporation is the Federal Government! IT IS THE GOVERNMENT!
That is right! Your Government is a Corporation! It is run under Roman Civil Law and operates outside of the Original Constitution!
"There is no way my Congressman knows this?"
Yeah Right!

Congress Is Aware Of The Deception

Congress knows exactly what happened Congress does not answer to the People. They answer first and foremost to the Corporation (aka. The United States) for which they are employees.
This is why illegal laws such as the income tax laws are not abolished. These so called Representatives are not OUR Civil Servants. They serve the Corporation only, you are merely the instrument that provides financing to them.
All the Committees and Sub-Committees that have been created by Congress all work in unison like a multi-headed Hydra to control all the Corporate Departments. Any actions by these Committees outside of the District Of Columbia is in complete violation of the LAW.
Once again, The Corporation Of The United States has absolutely NO JURISDICTION outside of The District Of Columbia. They have zero authority within any State of the Republic.
"This could not have really happened,who do you think your kidding."
This did not happen by accident. Please do your own Research!

Ignorance Of The Law Is No Excuse

Your Government has no responsibility to inform you of this. In the United States there is a presumption that you should know the Law.
They know you are not aware of this, they know because they made sure you would not be taught this in Corporate Government controlled School Systems.
A Sovereign Individual has a right to have all information disclosed to them. A Slave is entitled to nothing other then what their controllers wish to allow them, at A Cost. Be very careful of accepting certain Benefits from the Corporation Of The United States as they come with a price.
Once again, You are presumed to KNOW THE LAW. If you are not aware of the Law it matters not to the Corporation. You cannot claim Ignorance as a reason you do not know the Law. It is your Responsibility and your Obligation to know how the Law is applied to YOU.
They depend on peoples lackadaisical approach to Knowledge of the Law. It makes their job easier. The distractions in Life lead People to allow Government to think for them.
If we ever want our Republic back, this all needs to CHANGE.

YOU ARE PROPERTY!

The Government of the UNITED STATES is basically a Corporate Instrument of the International Bankers. In other words, YOU are owned by a Corporation from the time you are Birthed until the time of your death.
Everything you believe you own as property is a LIE! All your Assets, all your Property, even your Children are owned by the United States Corporation.
"You still do not believe it?"
Think about all those Bills you need to pay to the Government. Think of all the Taxes, all the Fines, Licenses, think of all the fees you are required to Pay. Do some Research on your own, read about the 14th amendment. Study the Act of 1871 and you will see how a great Nation of Sovereigns living in a Republic have been reduced to chattel of a democracy.
Under Roman Civil Law, because we were not aware of the facts, led to our Silence. The Silence of the People was misinterpreted as consent which left us to carry the burden of a Debt we did not Incur.
The People have been utterly deceived into still believing that we are a Sovereign People. Free and Independent, when the Truth is we are Slaves and Servants of the Corporation.

It Is Treason!

In 1871, the Forty-First Congress in essence committed Treason against the Sovereign People of the Republic of the United States. If there had been people of Honor in our Government this Ruse could have long ago been rectified. Instead the Lust for Money and Power has turned Honest men into Greedy Power Brokers.
"Could we forgive this aberration?"
Why should we! We have lost more Freedom then can be realized. All because of a Corporate Infiltration of the Federal Government.
The Constitutional Republic needs to be Restored. This facade of a democracy needs to come crumbling down.
Our men and women in uniform, who fight to preserve the ideals of a great country have been abused. They have fought, and often times died for a cause they were deluded into believing. Fighting in wars instigated by the Corporation to gain even more Power and Control worldwide.
Why would the People be willing to fight and die for a Corporate Interest that is not even of this country. Why fight a war initiated and funded through Foreign Bankers.
We need to educate the masses to this truth. The People have been lied to for too long. We need a REVOLUTION, not one of Violence but one of Education.
I do not know if the Original Constitutional Republic could ever be restored. I would hope that the Sovereign People once Educated could work together to restore our Great Nation.
It is the least we could do for Future Generations, to secure their Freedom and Liberty. Things which our Ancestors fought so hard to create. Will we Rise to the Call or simply remain silent as we have for so many years?
One last thought:FREEDOM
* Acts of the Forty-First Congress," Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62
**UNITED STATES CODE (The capitalization, symbolizes the Corporation, not the Republic) Title 28 3002 (15) (A) (B) (C).

CORPORATIONS CANNOT COMMIT A CRIME

CORPORATIONS CANNOT COMMITT A CRIME

The United States government has shown this distinction in the capitalization of the names of organized bodies in the 1984 USGPO Style Manual. Organized bodies are legal entities, which are organizations or associations recognized in law as an entity apart from the individual members. [ Ballantine's Law Dictionary, 3rd Ed., p. 719, 'Legal entity' (1969).]

Names of organized bodies

3.17. The full names of existing or proposed organized bodies and their shortened names are capitalized; other substitutes, which are most often regarded as common nouns, are capitalizedonly in certain specified instances to indicate preeminence or distinction.

U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual, p. 25, 'Capitalization Rules,' (1984).

See also U.S. Government Printing Office Style Manual, p. 30 (2008)

Below is taken from 14a C.J. §§3024-3025

"A Corporation can not in one sense commit a crime--a Corporation cannot be imprisoned if imprisonment be the sentence for the crime; [U.S. v. Union Supply Co., 215 U.S. S. 50, 55, 30 SCt 15, 64 L. ed. 87; U.S. v. Pacific Live Stock Co., 192 Fed. 443 (foll U.S. v. Union Supply Co., 215 U.S. 50, 30 SCt 15, 54 L. ed. 87); Com. V. Pulaski County Agricultural, etc., Assoc., 92 Ky. 197, 17 SW 442, 13 KyL 468. "The natural inference, when a statue prescribes to independent penalties, is that it means to inflict them so far as they can, and that if one of them is impossible, it does not mean on that account to let the defendant escape."  U.S. v. Union Supply Co., supra.]  A Corporation cannot be hanged or put to death if that be the punishment for the crime; and so, in those senses a Corporation cannot commit a crime.  But a Corporation may be fined, and a Corporation may pay damages."  Pharmaceutical Soc. v. London, etc., Supply Assoc., 5 App. Cas. 857, 869 (per Lord Blackburn).

In support of this doctrine it was said by Lord Denman: "we are told that this remedy is not required, because the individuals who concur and voting the order or inexecuting the work, may be made answerable for it by criminal proceedings.  Of this there is no doubt.  But the public knows nothing of the former; and the latter, if they can be identified, are commonly persons of the lowest rank, wholly incompetent to make any reparation for the injury.  There can be no effectual means for deterring from and oppress of exercise of power for the purposes of gain except the remedy by an indictment against those who truly committed, that is, the Corporation acting by its majority: and there is no principle which places them beyond the reach of the law for such proceedings."

"While the Corporation has no arms or hands by which is self to commit a penal offense, still they can employ servants and agents who acts are the acts of the Corporation and who can and do, in its behalf and at its behest, violate the criminal law."

Below is shows that if it is not an organized body (trust, corporation, partnership or some other entity) but a man then the pleading is to have the proper Christian name:

Defendant was impleaded by the name of A. W. Becker. Initials are no legal part of a name, the authorities holding the full Christian name to be essential.Wilson v. Shannon, 6 Ark. 196; Norris v. Graves, 4 Strob. 32; Seely v. Boon, 1 N.J.Law 138; Chappell v. Proctor, Harp. S.C. (Law) 49; Kinnersley v. Knott, 7 C.B. 980; Turner v. Fitt, 3 C.B. 701; Oakley v. Pegler, 46 N.W. 920; Knox v. Starks, 4 Minn. 20; Kenyon v. Semon, 45 N.W. 10; Beggs v. Wellman, 82 Ala. 391; Nash v. Collier, 5 Dowl. & L. 341; Fewlass v. Abbott, 28 Mich. 270. This loose method of pleading is not one to be commended, but, as no advantage was taken of it in the court below, it will not be considered here.  Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker, 147 U.S. 47, 58.