What is he planning????

On October 12, 2013, ABC’s Dianne Sawyer brought us a
video of a 9th, yes 9th, General fired from the military
this week. It’s even reaching some of the more liberal
stations and begging them to ask the question, “What is
going on?” It seems President Obama is preparing what he
calls “my military” for his version of the final
solution. With all the documentation we have, it looks
as though he is purging the military for the next step.

We have now seen this official President Obama
temper-tantrum in action this week. But is it a
temper-tantrum or is there a method to his madness?

We have been warned by a Pentagon Official to expect
radical changes. You heard of our dire warnings of
Chinese Economists planning to foreclose and forming the
TPP Treaty (Trans-Pacific-Partnership Treaty ..Google
it) that could set a global economy in motion. We have
the very real possibility of 16 U.S. States being
shut-down and handed over due to debt in this mess. We
even have a CIA whistle blower warning us that President
Obama wants to radically take over power. People are
crying out, where is our military in this mess?

Well, there seems to be some very credible evidence that
since last year and through this year that there has
been a “litmus test” given to American Military
Officers. The Main point of that test, “Would you fire
on an American Citizen?” If you say no, then as Donald
Trump would say, “Your fired!” Since the beginning of
the year these retired officers have come forward with
““President Obama is preparing for war against the
U.S.”. We even know Dr. Garrow and others confirmed this
litmus test.

Then we have heard President Obama himself talk about
“My Military”.

And this isn’t all. This strange chain of firings from
the Military is so bizarre and so unheard of that even
Dianne Sawyer of ABC news reached out to cover it when
the 9th, yes 9th, Military Commanding Officer was
relieved of duty in less than a year. This doesn’t
include the long list last year, this is just the nine
individuals this year alone.
General Carter Hamm, United States Army-Served as head
of the United States African Command. Was in charge of
the US African command during the fateful night of
September 11, 2012 when the lives of four American
citizens was taken in the Embassy in Benghazi. Hamm was
extremely critical of our Commander and Chief and stated
he lied about not having reinforcements in the area on
that night. Hamm “resigned and retired” on April of
2013.

Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette/United States
Navy-Commander of Carrier Strike Group Three. His most
recent activity served as Deputy Commander of the US
Naval Forces, US Central Command. He was in charge of
Air Craft Carriers in the Mediterranean Sea the night of
September 11, 2012. He testified before the hearing
committee and said that there may not have been time to
get the flight crews there but left the door open on if
told when the events took place if that he could have
had the aircraft launched upon cross-examination by Rep.
Tray Gowdey. Recently fired from the Administrative post
and relieved of Duty by the Obama Administration for
“utterance of a racial slur”.


Major General Ralph Baker, United States Army- Major
General Baker served as the Commander of the Joint Task
Force-Horn at Camp Lamar, Djibouti, Africa. Was also
involved in some aspect with the incident September 11,
2012, being under the African Command. Had said he
believed attack helicopters could have made it in time.
Relieved of command and fired for groping a civilian (no
assault charges or sexual misconduct charges filed with
JAG)

Brigadier General Bryan Roberts, United States
Army-General Roberts took command of Fort Jackson in
2011. Was considered a rising star in his field. He
served in Iraq during his service as the Commanding
Officer of the 2nd Brigade Combat Team, and was the
Deputy Commanding General of the United States Army
Recruiting Command, Fort Knox, KY. Relieved of Duty and
Fired for Adultery. While this is still on the books in
the United States Code of Military Justice, it has
rarely been used since President Bill Clinton’s
indiscretions.

Major General Gregg A. Sturdevant, United States Marine
Corps-Director of Strategic Planning and Policy of for
the United States Pacific Command and Commander of the
aviation wing at Camp Bastion, Afghanistan. Highly
decorated soldier with two Naval and Marine
Commendations and two Naval and Marine Good Conduct
medals. He also has an Air Medal with a gold star. He
served honorably and distinctively. He had asked about
supplies to his command. He was one of two commanding
officers suddenly relieved of command and fired from the
military for failure of proper force protection.
Major General Charles M.M. Gurganus, United States
Marine Corps- Regional Commander in the Southwest and I
Marine Expeditionary Force (a forward or frontal
division) in Afghanistan. Also Highly decorated with a
Defense Superior Service Medal, two Legion of Merritt
w/Valor, and three Meritorious Service Commendations.
Major General C.M.M. Gurganus had questioned the use of
Afghanistan patrols along side American patrols after
two officers were executed at their desk and a platoon
was lead into an ambush on the front lines. Was the
other commander relieved of duty for failure of proper
force protection.

Lieutenant General David Holmes Huntoon Jr, United
States Army-Served as the 58th Superintendent of the
United States Military Academy at West Point, NY. He had
graduated from the same academy in 1973 and had served
in Senior Planning and Education Services through the
majority of his career. He was “censored” for “an
investigation” into an “improper relationship” according
to The Department of Defense. Nothing was released to
the nature of the improper relationship. Nothing was
even mentioned if an actual investigation even took
place.

Vice Admiral Tim Giardina, United States Navy-Deputy
Commander of the United States Strategic Command.
Commander of the Submarine Group Trident, Submarine
Group 9 and Submarine Group 10, where every single one
of the 18 Nuclear Submarines with Nuclear Trident
Missiles of those three groups were in his command. This
commander earned six Legions of Merit, Two Meritorious
Service Medals, two Joint Service Commendation Medals,
and several other medals, ribbons and decorations in his
illustrious career. He was removed from service and
fired from the military for the charge of using
counterfeit poker chips (not making that up).

Last on the list, Major General Michael Carry, United
States Air Force-Commander 20th Air Force in charge of
9,600 people and 450 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles
(ICBM) at three operational wings and served in both
Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom.
He was Fired October 11, 2013, for “Personal
Misbehavior” is what was told to ABC News. He and
Giardina were both the two top Commanders over the
United States Nuclear Arsenal before their dismissal
within 48 hours of each other.
As ABC News reports, this is an extremely alarming rate
and one of the biggest and fastest purges of military
personnel ever recorded. It apparently is such a shock
at the rate even for a long time veteran of reporting
the news as Dianne Sawyer, because at one point she gets
heated saying two Commanders of the Nuclear Command.

You don’t put people who are not very intelligent and
without a squeaky clean record over that area of the
Military. It is enough to make the hardest and
staunchest of supporters as the ABC news crew to pause
and ask themselves, “what is he planning?”.

DHS purchases another 21.6 roounds of ammunition...

On Feb 7, 2013 10:31 AM, "R B" <rbcaddsvcs@gmail.com> wrote:
DHS Purchases 21.6 Million More Rounds of Ammunition
Federal agency has now acquired enough bullets to wage 30 year war

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
February 7, 2013

The Department of Homeland Security is set to purchase a further 21.6 million rounds of ammunition to add to the 1.6 billion bullets it has already obtained over the course of the last 10 months alone, figures which have stoked concerns that the federal agency is preparing for civil unrest.
>
> A solicitation posted yesterday on the Fed Bid website details how the bullets are required for the DHS Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Artesia, New Mexico.
>
> The solicitation asks for 10 million pistol cartridge .40 caliber 165 Grain, jacketed Hollow point bullets (100 quantities of 100,000 rounds) and 10 million 9mm 115 grain jacketed hollow point bullets (100 quantities of 100,000 rounds).
>
> The document also lists a requirement for 1.6 million pistol cartridge 9mm ball bullets (40 quantities of 40,000 rounds).
>
> An approximation of how many rounds of ammunition the DHS has now secured over the last 10 months stands at around 1.625 billion. In March 2012, ATK announced that they had agree to provide the DHS with a maximum of 450 million bullets over four years, a story that prompted questions about why the feds were buying ammunition in such large quantities.
>
> To put that in perspective, during the height of active battle operations in Iraq, US soldiers used 5.5 million rounds of ammunition a month. Extrapolating the figures, the DHS has purchased enough bullets over the last 10 months to wage a full scale war for almost 30 years.
>
> Such massive quantities of ammo purchases have stoked fears that the agency is preparing for some kind of domestic unrest. In 2011, Department of Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano directed Immigration and Customs Enforcement to prepare for a mass influx of immigrants into the United States, calling for the plan to deal with the “shelter” and “processing” of large numbers of people.
>
> The federal agency’s primary concern is now centered around thwarting “homegrown terrorism,” but information produced and used by the DHS to train its personnel routinely equates conservative political ideology with domestic extremism.
>
> A study funded by the Department of Homeland Security that was leaked last year characterizes Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as “extreme right-wing” terrorists.
>
> In August 2012, the DHS censored information relating to the amount of bullets purchased by the federal agency on behalf of Immigration & Customs Enforcement, citing an “unusual and compelling urgency” to acquire the bullets, noting that there is a shortage of bullets which is threatening a situation that could cause “substantial safety issues for the government” should law enforcement officials not be adequately armed.
>
> As we highlighted last month, the DHS’ previous ammunition solicitation was awarded to Evian Group, an organization that was formed just five days before the announcement of the solicitation and appeared to be little more than a front organization since it didn’t have a genuine physical address, a website, or even a phone number.
>
> While Americans are being browbeaten with rhetoric about the necessity to give up semi-automatic firearms in the name of preventing school shootings, the federal government is arming itself to the teeth with both ammunition and guns. Last September, the DHS purchased no less than 7,000 fully automatic assault rifles, labeling them “Personal Defense Weapons.”
>
> *********************
>
> Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

GOV: "PEOPLE ARE CORPORATIONS"

Subject: FW: CARPOOL LANE TICKET DEFENSE TO BE TESTED TODAY

Lengthy head notes notwithstanding, the SCOTUS found that corporations are "persons," not people. The same is true of U.S. citizens because they, like corporations, are legal fictions. sj

Man Uses Traffic Ticket to Challenge Supreme Court's Citizens United Decision: “Actually, Officer, I Have a Certificate Of Incorporation In the Glove Box, So the Two Of Us ‘People’ Should Be Allowed To Drive In the Carpool Lane”

A hearty congratulations this morning to one Jonathan Frieman of San Rafael, California. We realize it’s only January but as far as we’re concerned this Frieman guy has already won the entire year of 2013 for executing a rather brilliant prank on the textualist wing of the Supreme Court.

His plan was as simple as it was brilliant: Frieman just drove around in one of California’s carpool lanes by himself until he eventually was stopped by police for not having an additional person in the car. (Sidenote: Apparently carpool laws are enforced rather loosely in California. It took Frieman over 10 years of driving around like that before he was finally ticketed.)

Once Frieman was finally pulled over, he handed the officer a certificate of incorporation and voila!! According to the Supreme Court’s own precedent, Frieman suddenly had two “people” in his vehicle. Obviously, the officer still gave him the $481 ticket, so today Frieman is heading to traffic court to argue his case.

While Frieman says he has long opposed the legal community’s treatment of corporations as people, his carpool prank is particularly relevant to the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which expanded this construct even further. The Court in that case decided that corporations have the same speech rights as humans under the law, and therefore these corpo-people-hybrid-monsters are allowed to spend as much money as they want to influence elections.

Just in case this doesn’t sound completely insane to you already, keep in mind that the five justices who signed onto the majority in that case are the exact same guys who constantly accuse their more liberal colleagues of twisting around the meanings of words in order to suit their personal agendas. For instance!! In Citizens United, the liberal justices twisted around the meaning of “person” to mean “person” and somehow found that the word ”speech” means “speech.” The textualists, on the other hand, simply looked at the plain meaning of these words and decided that ”person” includes “corporations” and “speech” is the same thing as “money.” Therefore, limiting the amount of cash that, say, Exxon Mobil can spend to influence an election is just as much of a violation of the First Amendment as punishing an actual human being for writing a disagreeable blog post.

Well okey-doke then, Supreme Court! In that case, we’ll be slipping Wells Fargo some roofies so we can get ourselves preggers and collect some serious child support. (Technically Wal-Mart brings in more cash than Wells Fargo but we’re a little too classy for that. )

Anyway, assuming the police officer actually shows up at the traffic court today, the judge will be either need to: (a.) rule that, duh, obviously a corporation is not a person so articles of incorporation don’t count as an additional passenger; or (b) stand by the Supreme Court’s definition of a corporation and therefore publish a totally ludicrous decision holding that people can just strap their corporate documents into the front seat of their vehicle in order to ride in the carpool lane. Either way, hilarity and further appeals are sure to ensue.

http://www.newsforage.com/2013/01/man-uses-traffic-ticket-to-challenge.html

-- 
CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE 3527.  The law helps the vigilant, 
before those who sleep on their rights.

"A statute does not trump the Constitution." 
People v. Ortiz, (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th at p. 292, fn. 2 
Conway v. Pasadena Humane Society (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 163
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JERRY ARBERT POOL, C.A. No. 09-10303, 
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT 
(Opinion filed September 14, 2010), On Appeal From The United 
States District Court For The Eastern District of California

A statutory privilege cannot override a defendant's constitutional 
right.  People v. Reber, (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d. 523 [223 Cal.Rptr. 
139}; Vela v. Superior Ct, 208 Cal.App.3d. 141 [255 Cal.Rptr. 921], 
however, "the judiciary has a solemn obligation to insure that the 
constitutional right of an accused to a fair trial is realized.  If 
that right would be thwarted by enforcement of a statute, the state
...must yield." 
Vela v. Superior Ct., 208 Cal.App.3d. 141 [255 Cal.Rptr. 921

Obviously, administrative agencies, like police officers must obey 
the Constitution and may not deprive persons of constitutional rights.
Southern Pac. Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Com., 18 Cal.3d 308
[S.F. No. 23217. Supreme Court of California. November 23, 1976.]

If evidence of a fact is clear, positive, uncontradicted and 
of such nature it cannot rationally be disbelieved, the court 
must instruct that fact has been established as a matter of law. 
Roberts v. Del Monte Properties Co., 111 CA2d. 69 (1952)

If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to 
worry about answers.
Thomas Pynchon

They will do whatever we let them get away with.  
Joseph  Heller

-- 
Have a great day 
Sir Richard James, McDonald 
KNYAZ Cte MKSJ KOC KR PhD JD LLD

He has made Judges dependent on his Will
alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount 
and payment of their salaries.
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither 
swarms of Officers to harass our People, and eat out their
substance
The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the 
extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the
citizenship to the agencies of government.
City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944
Sir Richard James, McDonald
http://www.state-citizen.org/
Jitsi address  rjmcd
Skype address  rjmcd1
Brosix address rjmcd1 (Skype replacemnt)
Join our Citizenship Educational program
(818) 703-5037 voice

GOVERNMENT CLASSIFIES PEOPLE AS ANIMALS

“There are 2 kinds of dope dealers. There are those that work out of the streets of slums and wear Air Jordon tennis shoes. There are those that work out of offices and wear white coats.

“The difference is that the ones with the Air Jordons are unlicensed, don’t take Medi-Care or insurance and only sell for cash. They don’t pay taxes either. The ones with the white coats have licenses, pay taxes, charge more for their dope, seldom take cash and collect most of their sales from the government and insurance companies.

“Soma must be the generic name for Progenitorivox.”

Bear in mind that the entire pharmaceutical industry is based on state and federal definitions of the word “drug” (e.g., see TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE §431.002(14) and 21 U.S.C.A. §321(g)(1)) that presume the phrase “man or other animals”. This phrase declares the American people to be “animals” rather than men and women made in God’s image (as per Genesis 1:26-28) and endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights (“Declaration of Independence”). (See, http://adask.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/man-or-other-animals-1/) 

The whole pharmaceutical industry could be crippled or destroyed by a concerted attack on the “man or other animals” presumptions.
The presumption that the people are nothing but “animals” constitutes an act of genocide (see, http://adask.wordpress.com/2008/06/17/man-or-other-animals-3/).
The earliest instance of the federal government’s presumption that the people are nothing but “animals” is seen in Section 6 of the A.D. 1906 Pure Food & Drug Act. Your federal government has been committing acts of genocide against you and the American people for over a century. There is no way to square that century with the notion that government “is here to help you”. We are dealing with a government that’s been determined for over a century to deprive us of the God-given, unalienable Rights first declared in our “Declaration of Independence”.


Coincidentally, the word “sorcerer” appears in Revelation 21:8: ”But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.”
Strong’s Concordance defines that use of the word “sorcerers” (Strong’s # 5332) to be originally transliterated as pharmakeus in Greek. The Greek root for pharmakeus was pharmakon which meant “a drug, i.e. spell-giving potion”.


Thus, it appears that the original intent of Revelation 21:8 may have included a warning to those who use or sell “drugs” (“sorcerers”) that they may be destined for damnation.
The modern term “pharmaceutical” is ultimately derived from the Greek words pharmakeus and pharmakon. It’s at least arguable that the modern pharmaceutical industry includes “sorcerers” of the sort Revelation 21:8 declared to be evil and destined for damnation.


To order my book go: www.GuardDogBooks.com or Amazon.com

Government spending billions on detention camps.

This so important that I am sending this to everyone I can think of

The provision of the Trading with the Enemies Act of 1917, as modified on March 9, 1933 (search Congressional Record, March 9, 1933, Emergency Banking Act, Trading with the Enemies Act), to include American citizens as enemies is now about to be more fully implemented.  (BTW, this is the “secret” provision that Obama used to justify the murder of an American citizen)   With this new proposed law, I suppose that they have to fill those camps that Haliburton built to justify their $435M cost.  The camp, just southwest of Fairbanks, Alaska, by itself, can hold 2M people; and, during the winter, I bet you can turn over the population every 2 weeks or so.  That’s better than what the Nazi’s accomplished.  There are approximately 800 camps throughout the United States, fully staffed but currently sitting empty, Alaska being the largest.  These were established under Rex-84, Operation Cable Splicer and Operation Garden Plot, by executive orders of the Reagan administration (Google for more information).  

Do nothing and this is what you are facing for you and your family. 

Senate Moves To Allow Military To Intern Americans Without Trial

NDAA detention provision would turn America into a “battlefield”

Saturday, November 26, 2011

The Senate is set to vote on a bill next week that would define the whole of the United States as a “battlefield” and allow the U.S. Military to arrest American citizens in their own back yard without charge or trial.

“The Senate is going to vote on whether Congress will give this president—and every future president — the power to order the military to pick up and imprison without charge or trial civilians anywhere in the world. The power is so broad that even U.S. citizens could be swept up by the military and the military could be used far from any battlefield, even within the United States itself,” writes Chris Anders of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office.

Under the ‘worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial’ provision of S.1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which is set to be up for a vote on the Senate floor Monday, the legislation will “basically say in law for the first time that the homeland is part of the battlefield,” said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), who supports the bill.

The bill was drafted in secret by Senators Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.), before being passed in a closed-door committee meeting without any kind of hearing. The language appears in sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA bill.

“I would also point out that these provisions raise serious questions as to who we are as a society and what our Constitution seeks to protect,” Colorado Senator Mark Udall said in a speech last week. One section of these provisions, section 1031, would be interpreted as allowing the military to capture and indefinitely detain American citizens on U.S. soil. Section 1031 essentially repeals the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 by authorizing the U.S. military to perform law enforcement functions on American soil. That alone should alarm my colleagues on both sides of the aisle, but there are other problems with these provisions that must be resolved.”

This means Americans could be declared domestic terrorists and thrown in a military brig with no recourse whatsoever. Given that the Department of Homeland Security has characterized behavior such as buying gold, owning guns, using a watch or binoculars, donating to charity, using the telephone or email to find information, using cash, and all manner of mundane behaviors as potential indicators of domestic terrorism, such a provision would be wide open to abuse.

“American citizens and people picked up on American or Canadian or British streets being sent to military prisons indefinitely without even being charged with a crime. Really? Does anyone think this is a good idea? And why now?” asks Anders.

The ACLU is urging citizens to call their Senator and demand that the Udall Amendment be added to the bill, a change that would at least act as a check to prevent Americans being snatched off the streets without some form of Congressional oversight.

Under the National Defense Authorization Act bill, no declaration of martial law is necessary since Americans would now be subject to the same treatment as suspected insurgents in places like Afghanistan and Iraq.

If you thought that the executive assassination of American citizens abroad was bad enough, now similar powers will be extended to the “homeland,” in other words, your town, your community, your back yard.

https://secure.aclu.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=3865&s_subsrc=fixNDAA

Six years ago I did the numbers on the Fairbanks detention camp to find out if such a thing is possible. The numbers tell a gruesome story outrivaling anything Hitler could dream up. In order to take care of 2-million people and feed them this is what you need. For example, if you employed half the people in the entire state of Alaska 2-mllion divided by 350,000 = 5714 people. There is no way that one person could take care of 5714 people so obviously something is drastically wrong here.

Who will take care of the dogs and cats owned by 2-million people? Where is that food going to come from? Are they going to kill all the dogs, cats and parakeets, rabbits, ducks, hamsters, gineypigs, snakes, and fish owned by 2-million people. What is the government thinking? Where are they going to get the soldiers to round up all the people to fill 800 detention camps? 

Now let’s see how much food 2-million people would need to keep them alive. If you rationed the people to 1/2 pound of dried food a day you would need 1-million pounds of food a day. Where is this food going to come from? Say for instance, you brought a ship into Anchorage once a month carrying 30-million pounds of rice you might be able to keep them alive for a little while. However there is not enough people to cook 1-million pounds of rice a day. Where would you get the energy come from to cook 1-million pounds of rice each day?

Say for example, you charted jet airplanes to fly two million pounds of food into Fairbanks each day to keep the people alive, how many 747 plane loads would it take. Two million pounds is 1000 tones. Each plane can carry about 120,000 pounds or about 60-tons of food so you would need 17 plane loads each day flying into Fairbanks to feed the people. Where would the 1000 tons of food come from. Is there enough grain stored in Louisiana and how long would the supply last. What is on the government’s mind? Why did they build the 800 detention camps?