Friday, April 8, 2016

Plan on voting in the General Election?

Dereliction of Duty

Mar 26, 2016, at 10:r
Worth reading if you plan on voting in the General Election.
Colonel Phil "Hands" Handley is credited with the highest speed air-to-air gun kill in the history of aerial combat. He flew operationally for all but 11 months of a 26-year career, in aircraft such as the F-86 Sabre, F-15 Eagle, and the C-130A Hercules.
Additionally, he flew 275 combat missions during two tours in Southeast Asia in the F- 4D and F-4E. His awards include 21 Air Medals, 3 Distinguished Flying Crosses, and the Silver Star.
Here is what Col. Handley wrote in response to Panetta and Dempsey's claims there was no time to send help to Benghazi .
Betrayal in Benghazi     Phil "Hands" Handley Colonel, USAF (Ret.)
The combat code of the US Military is that we don't abandon our dead or wounded on the battlefield. In US Air Force lingo, fighter pilots don't run off and leave their wingmen. If one of our own is shot down, still alive and not yet in enemy captivity, we will either come to get him or die trying.
Among America’s fighting forces, the calm, sure knowledge that such an irrevocable bond exists is priceless. Along with individual faith and personal grit, it is a sacred trust that has often sustained hope in the face of terribly long odds.
The disgraceful abandonment of our Ambassador and those brave ex-SEALs who fought to their deaths to save others in that compound is nothing short of dereliction-of-duty.
Additionally, the patently absurd cover-up scenario that was fabricated in the aftermath was an outright lie in an attempt to shield the President and the Secretary of State from responsibility.
It has been over three years since the attack on our compound in  Benghazi. The White House strategy, with the aid of a "lap dog" press has been to run out the clock before the truth is forthcoming.
The testimonies of the three "whistle blowers" have reopened the subject and hopefully will lead to exposure and disgrace of those responsible for this embarrassing debacle. It would appear that the most recent firewall which the Administration is counting on is the contention "that there were simply no military assets that could be  brought to bear in time to make a difference" mainly due to the unavailability of tanker support for fighter aircraft.
This is simply BS, regardless how many supposed "experts" the Administration trot out to make such an assertion.
The bottom line is that even if the closest asset capable of response was half-way around the world, you don't just sit on your penguin ass and do nothing.
The fact is that the closest asset was not half-way around the world, but as near as Aviano Air Base , Italy where two squadrons of F-16Cs are based.
Consider the following scenario (all times Benghazi local): When Hicks in Tripoli receives a call at 9:40 PM from Ambassador Stevens informing him “Greg, we are under attack!" (his last words), Hicks immediately notifies all agencies and prepares for the immediate initiation of an existing Emergency Response Plan."
At AFRICON, General Carter Ham attempts to mount a rescue effort, but is told to"stand down". By 10:30 PM an unarmed drone is overhead the compound and streaming live feed to various "Command and Control Agencies" so everyone watching that feed knew damn well what was going on.
At 11:30 PM Doherty and five others leave Tripoli, arriving in Benghazi at 1:30 AM on Wednesday morning, where they hold off the attacking mob from the roof of the compound until they are killed by a direct mortar hit at 4:00 AM.
So nothing could have been done, eh? Nonsense. If one assumes that tanker support really "was not available" what about this: When at 10:00 PMAFRICON alerts the 31st TFW Command Post in Aviano Air Base, Italy of the attack, the Wing Commander orders preparation for the launch of two F-16s and advises the Command Post at NAS Sigonella to prepare for hot pit refueling and quick turn of the jets.
By 11:30 PM, two F-16Cs with drop tanks and each armed with five hundred 20 MM rounds are airborne. Flying at 0.92 Mach they will cover the 522 nautical miles directly to NAS Sigonella in 1.08 hours. While in-route, the flight lead is informed of the tactical situation, rules of engagement, and radio frequencies to use.
The jets depart Sigonella at 1:10 AM with full fuel load and cover the 377 nautical miles directly to Benghazi in 0.8 hours, arriving at1:50 AM which would be 20 minutes after the arrival of Woods, Doherty and their team.
Providing that the two F-16s initial pass over the mob, in full afterburner at 200 feet and 550 knots did not stop the attack in its tracks, a few well- placed strafing runs on targets of opportunity would assuredly do the trick.
Were the F-16s fuel state insufficient to return to Sigonelli after jettisoning their external drop tanks, they could easily do so at Tripoli International Airport, only one-half hour away.
As for those hand- wringing naysayers who would worry about IFR clearances, border crossing authority, collateral damage, landing rights, political correctness and dozens of other reasons not to act -- screw them. It is time our "leadership" get its priorities straight and put America's interests first.
The end result would be that Woods and Doherty would be alive. Dozens in the attacking rabble would be rendezvousing with "72 virgins" and a clear message would have been sent to the next worthless POS terrorist contemplating an attack on Americans that it is not really a good idea to "tug" on Superman's cape.
Of course, all this depends upon a Commander In Chief more concerned with saving the lives of those he put in harm's way than getting his crew rested for a campaign fund raising event in Las Vegas the next day. It also depends upon a Secretary of State who actually understood "What difference did it make?", and a Secretary of Defense who was watching the feed from the drone and understood what the attack consisted of instead of making an immediate response that "One of the military tenants is that you don't commit assets until you fully understand the tactical situation."
Ultimately it comes down to the question of who gave that order to stand down? Whoever that coward turns out to be should be exposed, removed from office, and face criminal charges for dereliction of duty. The combat forces of the United States of America deserve leadership that really does "have their back" when the chips are down.

Saturday, April 2, 2016


The current massive influx of supposed "refugees" into Europe is
having surprise-packed consequences.
1. Terrorists are pouring in with the flood of refugees.
2. Military aged men make up an estimated 70 % of the "immigrants".
3. They are determined to make Europe into what they want it to be.
4. There are almost daily reports of new rapes and gang rapes
   occurring throughout Europe.
5. While rape has always existed, what is happening now is new for
   our day. While rape has always followed war, this is something
   new - using rape as a tool of war.
Bill White, writing for Survivopedia, correctly notes that "Sweden
has become the rape capital of Europe and perhaps of the world, if
we leave out the lands controlled by ISIS."

The Muslim invaders apparently feel they have a right to any woman
they see.
This matches the teaching of their Imams and the Quran which states
that all lust is caused by women; it is not in the heart of the man.
Therefore the women are the ones who cause it.
In a recently published video, a female Muslim professor states that
the rape of non-Muslim women is acceptable in the Muslim religion.
It is to be used as a means to humiliate the women, the ultimate goal
being to force them to convert to Islam. There is even a reference
to the woman being converted by the sexual act.
Her specific statements refer to raping women captured in war, but
the invasion of Europe is a war in Muslim eyes.
The Quran commands Muslims to go to other lands and take the
position of being the heads over the people of the land. They are not
to put themselves under the authority of "infidel" non-Muslims or
their laws. That is a sin. They are to take over the lands.
This is called hijrah. It is as old as Islam itself. The first hijrah
was when Muhammed himself left Mecca to go to Medina. He and his
followers went there for the purpose of conquest, to take Medina and
force its population to convert to Islam.
This was the beginning of hijrah as a means of conquest. It has been
used ever since.
The Trojan Horse of the so-called Syrian "refugees" is not just the
terrorists who are hidden among them, but each and every Muslim. It
matters not if they are terrorists. They are all committed to the
spread of Islam. Refugees are being used as an excuse to send
millions of people into the western world for the purpose of conquest.

A ridiculous statement, that such a small group could conquer a
The truth is, they have already taken over areas of several European
countries, and made them into "no-go" zones. Those areas are totally
under Muslim control and are governed by Sharia Law. The police and
the elected government of the nation have no power and no say. They
have, in effect, been kicked out. The area has effectively been
This has been done with relatively few people, mere thousands.
What will happen when there are millions more?
Will fighting-aged male jihadis come to your city where they can wreak
havoc, just as thousands of Muslim “refugees” did in Germany,
Switzerland and Sweden on New Year’s Eve, 2016?
Hundreds of women were raped, robbed and beaten across Europe on New
Year’s Eve by the Syrian, Iraqi and other Islamic “refugees” who have
flooded into those nations.
How will those governments stand against Muslim pressure, when the
"moderate" Muslims know exactly which buttons to push in order to get
things their way?
Muslims comprise almost a quarter of the world's population - 1.6
billion persons.
You might wonder, how could it ever be that hundreds of women were
raped, robbed and beaten across Europe on New Year’s Eve by the
Syrian, Iraqi and other Islamic “refugees” who have flooded into
those nations?
Listen to this.
An Islamic professor has allegedly claimed Muslim men are allowed by
Allah to rape non-Muslim women in order to “humiliate” them.
Professor Saud Saleh – from Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt –
reportedly said rape is allowed between times of “legitimate war”
between Muslims and their enemies.
In a television interview Saleh appears to try to discourage the
purchase of slaves from Asian countries for sex, claiming Allah has
given Muslim men a “legitimate” way to have sexual relations with
slave women.
Cairo-Slavery-Muslim-Women-Pagan-ISIS-Al-Azhar-University Egypt?utm_
source=traffic.outbrain& utm_medium=traffic.outbrain&utm_term=traffic.
Attacks like those already occurring are going to increase.
While they are mostly in Europe right now, you can expect them soon
to be closer to where you are.
As United States president Obama allows more and more into the USA,
it is well to keep in mind that they are not coming as refugees, nor
as immigrants. They are coming as a conquering army. And, as far as
they are concerned, they have already won the war and your women
are the spoils of that war.

, if you didn't know, events have started to happen in
Europe, USA and Australia right now that are set to change the
world overnight.

Big upheavals are coming to your life and that of your family