Monday, May 27, 2013

How to win in court. UCC 1-207 explained

Dean Clifford, Menard, Bonacci and others are discovering how to win in court. Type their names into youtube.

I was saddled with two ten-year-long lawsuits. The lawyers and Judges drag these things out because they are making money off you. I wound up spending over $250,000 in legal fees for nothing. You only have forty years of useful productive life from age 25 to 65. After that, for the most part you are too old and disabled to start over building a retirement. Before age 25 you usually don’t know what to do with the rest of your life and you lack education. Two of these ten-year-long lawsuits will take half of your useful productive life away and there is nothing more wasteful. It wasn’t until I fired my lawyers that I started winning. Now that I understand how these very destructive type of lawsuits work they will never bother me again. The only problem now is that I am 69 years old and have wasted most of my life fighting bogus lawsuits before I got wise. Here is what you must do:    

When you go into court and you are asked to state your name, say:
I am the Executor and Beneficiary of the last will and testament of God.
What is your standing here?
Are you the Trustee?
What is your claim?
Who are you?         
What is your name?
I am administrating here. (You have to establish what roles the various people are playing in the courtroom. Once you have that established you are free to go.)

All courts use corporate law. There has to be three officers to make a corporation.
Corporate Law is the highest law in the land. It is god’s Law. It is the Holy Trinity. The Bible is God’s Last Will and Testament. Picture a triangle with God at the top and Jesus at lower left. Then you have the Holy Ghost at lower right. In a courtroom situation the Judge is the Executor/executioner at the top. The Holy Ghost is the corporate government at the right. The Holy Ghost government and the God/Executor/executioner is all the same thing while you are the beneficiary. Everyone in the courtroom is there for one thing: to take something from you rather it be your trust/money/life savings/insurance, house, land etc. or in some cases even your, life.

All contract/corporate law operates by presumption. Practically every court in the land uses this highest form of law. They automatically turn your name into a corporate fiction with all capital letters so that the corporate/contract law will apply to your corporate fiction.

Under contract law you never want to be the trustee and you never want the Judge to be the Executor. Under contract law a person (you are a person or dead animal defined in Blacks Law) cannot hold the office of Beneficiary and Trustee or Executor and that’s exactly what is going on in the courtroom. In a courtroom the government holds two offices, the Executor/Judge and the Trustee who wants what you have. They want to take away your trust.

The Judge is not the Executor but he wants you to presume that he is. In reality, he is working for the government who is the trustee. His paycheck comes from the government but he gets a big bonus if he puts someone in jail. In most cases he also has his retirement pension invested in prison stocks therefore everyone he puts in prison benefits the company.

The government holds everything in trust for the people. So when you walk into a court room you automatically have two corporate entities trying to get something from you rather it be for you to confess to a crime you did not do or to take something from you like your house, land, inheritance, IRA, life insurance etc., etc. You are the one that owns something that the lawyers want to get.

You can nullify all that right off if you establish what rolls the people are playing in the courtroom.

When you hire a lawyer to re-present you he has previously sworn an oath to the Barr Association that supersedes any kind of commitment that he has to re-present you. Therefor you have hired someone who is automatically on the side of the government. For the most part any money you give him for a retainer to re-present you is a big waste of money unless you know the attorney is really working for you and has a good chance of winning. About 3 percent of defendants actually win a case. Your odds of actually winning a case with a lawyer are quite small.

You then have a very small chance to contest this by asking the question: “Can I be bound to a contract when my lawyer has a superseding oath?” You can say: “He didn’t provide full disclosure and my lawyer allowed the trial to go forward with the “Presumption” that the Judge is both the Administrator and Executor (executioner). Nothing has changed since the days of the inquisition.

Before you have been suckered into one of these contract courtrooms you definitely must establish a CLAIM OF RIGHT. Simply ask in writing: “Please provide proof of claim for something that you are alleging that I cannot do.” State: “My rights have a fee attached. My offers are non-negotiable. Violating any of my God given rights is a fee of ten-million dollars. You got 21 days to respond.

“Send me some facts or evidence of something I cannot do!”    

Say: “I plead guilty to the facts.” “Are you a bureaucrat?”

All bureaucrats are non-productive entities. All they produce is paperwork. They need us because we are the only ones producing things. All others are parasites.

 If we are all equal under God, when did they get the power to command us?  Government is stealing our livelihood by printing more money and dreaming up bureaucratic hoops for us to jump through so they can sell us a license to line their pockets with more money before we are allowed to work for a living. The constant inflation and enactment of millions of statutes and regulations is taking our children’s future. We can’t get married, drive a car, dig a ditch; or a hundred other things without first paying off some bureaucrat for a permit or license. The license fees are supposed to pay for insurance and other bogus reclamation plans. It was the loggers, fishermen, miners and factory workers that built this nation. Maybe it’s time to separate the wheat from the chaff.

UCC 1-207

Every system of law has Remedy and Recourse. Remedy is a way out under the law.
Recourse provides that if you have been damaged under the law you can recover your loss.

When you go to court you are in Commercial International Jurisdiction. If you claim Constitutional Rights you can be charged with Contempt of Court.

You can’t be charged under one Jurisdiction and defend yourself in another!
So: In a UCC Court you must claim your Reservation of Rights under UCC 1-207.

The proper answer is: “The Law doesn’t apply to me.” Then you must make your reservation in which you are charged. UCC 1-207.
“Without Prejudice” is OK

When asked to explain say: “I reserve my right to be compelled to perform under any contract on Commercial Agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally.” “I don not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unreserved contract or Commercial Agreement.”

The code is complimentary to the Common Law which remains in force except where displaced by the Code. A statute should be constructed in harmony with the Common Law, unless there is a clear Legislative intent to abrogate the Common Law.

UCC 1-206 ANDERSON Uniform Code Lawyers Cooperative Publishing Company:
“The code cannot be read to preclude Common Law.”

Section UCC 103.c Say:
“I have a remedy under the UCC, to reserve my rights under Common Law. I have exercised the remedy and now you must construe this statute in harmony with the Common Law. To be in Harmony with Common Law you must come forth with the damaged party.”

If the Judge proceeds then ask: “Let me see if I understand. Your Honor, has the court made a , legal determination that Section 1-207 and 1-103 of the Uniform Commercial Code which is the system of Law you are operating under are not valid law before this court?

If the answer is yes then say: “I put this court on notice that I am appealing your legal determination. The higher court will uphold the Code on appeal.”

When you sign a driver’s license, lease, buy a car, snowmobile, a building permit, marriage license, divorce decree etc. or any other document you have a right to draw a line through anything that is not in your interest. It can be a number, a word or group of words. A contract must have all of the contract in full disclosure at the time of signing. Add: Seller makes no express guarantees of sea worthiness or condition. Add: “UCC 1-207” or “Without Prejudice” then sign your name.   



There's a new post at

Synthetic Biology Project Funded on Kickstarter

I hope chemtrails have not put you to sleep!!

This post is important!


Saturday, May 25, 2013

World bank insider Blows Whistle...

Subject: citizensoftheUSofA] World Bank Insider Blows Whistle on Corruption, Federal Reserve
Its never enough...
A former insider at the World Bank, ex-Senior Counsel Karen Hudes, says the global financial system is dominated by a small group of corrupt, power-hungry figures centered around the privately owned U.S. Federal Reserve. The network has seized control of the media to cover up its crimes, too, she explained. In an interview with The New American, Hudes said that when she tried to blow the whistle on multiple problems at the World Bank, she was fired for her efforts. Now, along with a network of fellow whistleblowers, Hudes is determined to expose and end the corruption. And she is confident of success.

Citing an explosive 2011 Swiss study published in the PLOS ONE journal on the “network of global corporate control,” Hudes pointed out that a small group of entities — mostly financial institutions and especially central banks — exert a massive amount of influence over the international economy from behind the scenes. “What is really going on is that the world’s resources are being dominated by this group,” she explained, adding that the “corrupt power grabbers” have managed to dominate the media as well. “They’re being allowed to do it.”

According to the peer-reviewed paper, which presented the first global investigation of ownership architecture in the international economy, transnational corporations form a “giant bow-tie structure.” A large portion of control, meanwhile, “flows to a small tightly-knit core of financial institutions.” The researchers described the core as an “economic ‘super-entity’” that raises important issues for policymakers and researchers. Of course, the implications are enormous for citizens as well.

Hudes, an attorney who spent some two decades working in the World Bank’s legal department, has observed the machinations of the network up close. “I realized we were now dealing with something known as state capture, which is where the institutions of government are co-opted by the group that’s corrupt,” she told The New American in a phone interview. “The pillars of the U.S. government — some of them — are dysfunctional because of state capture; this is a big story, this is a big cover up.”

At the heart of the network, Hudes said, are 147 financial institutions and central banks — especially the Federal Reserve, which was created by Congress but is owned by essentially a cartel of private banks. “This is a story about how the international financial system was secretly gamed, mostly by central banks — they’re the ones we are talking about,” she explained. “The central bankers have been gaming the system. I would say that this is a power grab.”

The Fed in particular is at the very center of the network and the coverup, Hudes continued, citing a policy and oversight body that includes top government and Fed officials. Central bankers have also been manipulating gold prices, she added, echoing widespread concerns that The New American has documented extensively. Indeed, even the inaccurate World Bank financial statements that Hudes has been trying to expose are linked to the U.S. central bank, she said.

“The group that we’re talking about from the Zurich study — that’s the Federal Reserve; it has some other pieces to it, but that’s the Federal Reserve,” Hudes explained. “So the Federal Reserve secretly dominated the world economy using secret, interlocking corporate directorates, and terrorizing anybody who managed to figure out that they were having any kind of role, and putting people in very important positions so that they could get a free pass.”

The shadowy but immensely powerful Bank for International Settlements serves as “the club of these private central bankers,” Hudes continued. “Now, are people going to want interest on their country’s debts to continue to be paid to that group when they find out the secret tricks that that group has been doing? Don’t forget how they’ve enriched themselves extraordinarily and how they’ve taken taxpayer money for the bailout.”

As far as intervening in the gold price, Hudes said it was an effort by the powerful network and its central banks to “hold onto its paper currency” — a suspicion shared by many analysts and even senior government officials. The World Bank whistleblower also said that contrary to official claims, she did not believe there was any gold being held in Fort Knox. Even congressmen and foreign governments have tried to find out if the precious metals were still there, but they met with little success. Hudes, however, believes the scam will eventually come undone.

“This is like crooks trying to figure out where they can go hide. It’s a mafia,” she said. “These culprits that have grabbed all this economic power have succeeded in infiltrating both sides of the issue, so you will find people who are supposedly trying to fight corruption who are just there to spread disinformation and as a placeholder to trip up anybody who manages to get their act together.… Those thugs think that if they can keep the world ignorant, they can bleed it longer.”

Of course, the major corruption at the highest levels of government and business is not a new phenomenon. Georgetown University historian and Professor Carroll Quigley, who served as President Bill Clinton’s mentor, for example, wrote about the scheme in his 1966 book Tragedy And Hope: A History Of The World In Our Time. The heavyweight academic, who was allowed to review documents belonging to the top echelons of the global establishment, even explained how the corrupt system would work — remarkably similar to what Hudes describes.

"The powers of financial capitalism had a far-reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole,” wrote Prof. Quigley, who agreed with the goals but not the secrecy. “This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks which were themselves private corporations."

But it is not going to happen, Hudes said — at least not if she has something do to with it. While the media are dominated by the “power grabber” network, Hudes has been working with foreign governments, reporters, U.S. officials, state governments, and a broad coalition of fellow whistleblowers to blow the entire scam wide open. There has been quite a bit of interest, too, particularly among foreign governments and state officials in the United States.

Citing the wisdom of America’s Founding Fathers in creating a federal system of government with multiple layers of checks and balances, Hudes said she was confident that the network would eventually be exposed and subjected to the rule of law, stopping the secret corruption. If and when that happens — even if it may be disorderly — Hudes says precious metals will once again play a role in imposing discipline on the monetary system. The rule of law would also be restored, she said, and the public will demand a proper press to stay informed.

“We’re going to have a cleaned-up financial system, that’s where it is going, but in the meantime, people who didn’t know how the system was gamed are going to find out,” she said. “We’re going to have a different kind of international financial system.... It’ll be a new kind of world where people know what’s going on — no more backroom deals; that’s not going to keep happening. We’re going to have a different kind of media if people don’t want to be dominated and controlled, which I don’t think they do.”

While Hudes sounded upbeat, she recognizes that the world is facing serious danger right now — there are even plans in place to impose martial law in the United States, she said. The next steps will be critical for humanity. As such, Hudes argues, it is crucial that the people of the world find out about the lawlessness, corruption, and thievery that are going on at the highest levels — and put a stop to it once and for all. The consequences of inaction would be disastrous.
Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.
- Martin Luther King

Monday, May 20, 2013

Who are those guys with guns???

Subject: Who Were Those Bad Guys With Guns?
Commentary from Paul R. Beane on KFYO radio on 1/24/2013:
Good afternoon, I'm Paul R. Beane, and I'm your right-wing gun nut.

You know me and my fellow gun owners are responsible for all the carnage in our streets and our schools. Never mind that Ted Kennedy's car has killed more people than my entire collection of firearms. Most of which I have owned since childhood, when I saved my pennies and nickels in order to purchase them, and each and every one is in perfect working order. It is the responsible gun owners of today who are being blamed for all the shootings. Obama calls us the right-wing gun nuts, clinging to our guns and to our religion.

But let's take a little closer look. The Fort Hood shooter is a Muslim and a registered Democrat. The Virginia Tech shooter wrote hate mail to George Bush and his staff and was a registered Democrat. Aurora Colorado shooter was a staff worker on the Obama campaign and took part in Occupy Wall Street. He was a progressive liberal and guess what? A registered Democrat. The Newtown, Conn, shooter hated Christians and was a registered Democrat. The Columbine highschool shooters were too young to vote, but both of their families were progressive liberals and registered Democrats.

And one more thing...not a single one of these killers was a member of the National Rifle Association. So I have got it figured out how to make this country much safer; leave the guns alone and lock up all the Democrats!

I'm Paul R. Beane, and that's the way I see it!

White House ties to NEWS ORGANIZATIONS

Sunday, May 19, 2013



By Moritz Nestor, Current Concerns

ADHD HoaxFortunately, the Swiss National Advisory Commission on Biomedical Ethics (NEK, President: Otfried Höffe) critically commented on the use of the ADHD drug Ritalin in its opinion of 22 November 2011 titled Human enhancement by means of pharmacological agents: The consumption of pharmacological agents altered the child’s behavior without any contribution on his or her part.
That amounted to interference in the child’s freedom and personal rights, because pharmacological agents induced behavioral changes but failed to educate the child on how to achieve these behavioral changes independently. The child was thus deprived of an essential learning experience to act autonomously and emphatically which “considerably curtails children’s freedom and impairs their personality development”, the NEK criticized.
The alarmed critics of the Ritalin disaster are now getting support from an entirely different side. The German weekly Der Spiegel quoted in its cover story on 2 February 2012 the US American psychiatrist Leon Eisenberg, born in 1922 as the son of Russian Jewish immigrants, who was the “scientific father of ADHD” and who said at the age of 87, seven months before his death in his last interview: “ADHD is a prime example of a fictitious disease”
Since 1968, however, some 40 years, Leon Eisenberg’s “disease” haunted the diagnostic and statistical manuals, first as “hyperkinetic reaction of childhood”, now called “ADHD”. The use of ADHD medications in Germany rose in only eighteen years from 34 kg (in 1993) to a record of no less than 1760 kg (in 2011) – which is a 51-fold increase in sales! In the United States every tenth boy among ten year-olds already swallows an ADHD medication on a daily basis. With an increasing tendency.
When it comes to the proven repertoire of Edward Bernays, the father of propaganda, to sell the First World War to his people with the help of his uncle’s psychoanalysis and to distort science and the faith in science to increase profits of the industry – what about investigating on whose behalf the “scientific father of ADHD” conducted science? His career was remarkably steep, and his “fictitious disease” led to the best sales increases. And after all, he served in the “Committee for DSM V and ICD XII, American Psychiatric Association” from 2006 to 2009. After all, Leon Eisenberg received “the Ruane Prize for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Research. He has been a leader in child psychiatry for more than 40 years through his work in pharmacological trials, research, teaching, and social policy and for his theories of autism and social medicine”.
ADHD HoaxAnd after all, Eisenberg was a member of the “Organizing Committee for Women and Medicine Conference, Bahamas, November 29 – December 3, 2006, Josiah Macy Foundation (2006)”. The Josiah Macy Foundation organized conferences with intelligence agents of the OSS, later CIA, such as Gregory Bateson and Heinz von Foerster during and long after World War II. Have such groups marketed the diagnosis of ADHD in the service of the pharmaceutical market and tailor-made for him with a lot of propaganda and public relations? It is this issue that the American psychologist Lisa Cosgrove and others investigated in their study Financial Ties between DSM-IV Panel Members and the Pharmaceutical Industry7. They found that “Of the 170 DSM panel members 95 (56%) had one or more financial associations with companies in the pharmaceutical industry. One hundred percent of the members of the panels on ‘Mood Disorders’ and ‘Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders’ had financial ties to drug companies. The connections are especially strong in those diagnostic areas where drugs are the first line of treatment for mental disorders.” In the next edition of the manual, the situation is unchanged. “Of the 137 DSM-V panel members who have posted disclosure statements, 56% have reported industry ties – no improvement over the percent of DSM-IV members.” “The very vocabulary of psychiatry is now defined at all levels by the pharmaceutical industry,” said Dr Irwin Savodnik, an assistant clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of California at Los Angeles.
ADHD HoaxThis is well paid. Just one example: The Assistant Director of the Pediatric Psychopharmacology Unit at Massachusetts General Hospital and Associate Professor of Psychiatry at Harvard Medical School received “$1 million in earnings from drug companies between 2000 and 2007”. In any case, no one can easily get around the testimony of the father of ADHD: “ADHD is a prime example of a fictitious disease.”
The task of psychologists, educators and doctors is not to put children on the “chemical lead” because the entire society cannot handle the products of its misguided theories of man and raising children, and instead hands over our children to the free pharmaceutical market. Let us return to the basic matter of personal psychology and education: The child is to acquire personal responsibility and emphatic behavior under expert guidance – and that takes the family and the school: In these fields, the child should be able to lead off mentally. This constitutes the core of the human person.

Free counters!
  • There is much evidence and connections that have been made which seems to indicate that there are covert government programs being used to brainwash, or erase the memory of their subjects. A further investigation into these programs reveal much deeper secrets involving victims and suspects of shootings such as Columbine, Aurora and are likely practiced within most American communities and other parts of the modern world.
  • Find out why the eighth President of the United States must have been the luckiest man in the world. A shocking and disturbing journey into the secret history of scandalous proceedings in relation to election fraud on a massive scale. Our leaders have always been selected rather than elected.
  • A recent wave of viruses are being identified including one that recently "vanished" from a "locked" bio-hazard freezer at the University of Texas Medical Branch. Similarly, a new virus known as a "Coronavirus" is making its way through Asia and Europe.

Saturday, May 18, 2013


DMV gives EXEMPT Plate, to “not for hire” driver.

Attached are new genuine CA Exempt license plates. Issued yesterday (5-15-2013) from the California Costa Mesa DMV. Total cost $0, expires December 2099.
This man went in complaining that he keeps getting harassed as he is a “not for hire”, not a US citizen, as he traveled as a right.
Possibly this is an “exemption” only from registration, true independence from the Department of Motor Vehicles would be a complete “not included”.
Exemption means that they chose to not include you, actually when if “not for hire” then you are independent by right, not by privilege.
More info will soon be posted on this process being used by his many friends across the nation.

Exempt plates


Click on the above, you will see that the “state” requires liability insurance on the Mercedes. Travel by right requires no regulation and that means no requirement for Liability insurance, all you need to understand is that you are liable under common law.

So if one is subject to any State of Nebraska written law then one is subject to all unless having a granted exempted privilege Looks like this is only an exemption as to plating the car yearly.
I opt for full right, no state plate, no state registration, no liability insurance, no duty except that the Lord lays on me to love one another.

3 Responses to “DMV gives EXEMPT Plate, to “not for hire” driver.”

  1. JeffMay 17, 2013 at 5:57 am#
    This is fantastic. Please do post details on the process and/or how it can be verified.
  2. SueAnneMay 18, 2013 at 10:09 am#
    If you get a California Exempt Plate it means you are government owned such as a police, city employee etc. The code says you do not have to register your car. Think about it!
    • adminMay 18, 2013 at 3:37 pm#
      Yes, but it appears that they are going to leave him alone. I have stories of the same in other states, and they have “do not arrest” in the system for these people.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Gun Control Unlawful...

Absolutely Amazing & Eloquent Constitutional Law & Our History Shows Federal Gun Control Is Unlawful

Please watch the 25 minute Video by Publius Huldah:
Publius Huldah's Web Site:
March 3, 2013 - Posted by | 2nd Amendment, armed citizens, gun control, marque and reprisal, Militia, Nullification by States, Nullification of unconstitutional acts, Resistance to tyranny, Tennessee Constitution | , , , ,

Nunc Pro Tunc: The Coming Day of Burn Barrels and Blessings

This is a standing invitation to my fellow Americans: If congress ever enacts a law mandating the registration and/or a production ban of detachable magazine semiautomatic rifles then you are hereby invited to the town square of your local community. There, burn barrels will be set up and we will publicly burn Form 4473s, FFL Bound Books, state and local registration records, and the sales receipts for every firearm in the United States. On that same day, FFL holders and public officials holding electronic firearms records will simultaneously erase those records, permanently and irretrievably. (Using special file erasure software such as Blancco, X-Ways, and Stellar Wipe, or though the physical destruction of disk drives.)
Spontaneous Gatherings, Spontaneous Combustion
This burn barrel day--likely to be held the day after the President signs any new draconian legislation--will include speeches, public prayers, and the blessing of those who have gathered by ministers, rabbis, and priests.
The core of the activities on that day will be stalwart public defiance of any new unconstitutional law(s), the open and notorious destruction of records that might be used to enslave us, and vocal public affirmations of solidarity of free men and women, in the face of tyranny. This will be a defining moment for America--a line drawn in the sand. We will forthrightly declare that we will not obey any unconstitutional law and that we will treat it dismissively, as if it had never been enacted -- nunc pro tunc. We will pledge ourselves to the defense of liberty, both individually and collectively. We will vow that if ever called to jury duty, we will nullify any unconstitutional laws, vacating the charges against the accused, in accordance with our long-standing right as jurors. (See:
The Law is On Our Side
We will publicly re-affirm some long standing precepts of American jurisprudence, to wit:

§ 195 Generally
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, whether federal or state, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law(1) but is wholly void(2) and ineffective for any purpose.(3) Since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it,(4) an unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed(5) and never existed;(6) that is, it is void ab initio.(7) Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.(8)

Since an unconstitutional law is void, it follows that generally the statute imposes no duties,(9) confers no rights,(10) creates no office(11) or liabilities,(12) bestows no power or authority on anyone,(13) affords no protection,(14) is incapable of creating any rights or obligations,(15) does not allow for the granting of any relief,(16) and justifies no acts performed under it.(17)

Once a statute is determined to be unconstitutional, no private citizen or division of the state may take any further action pursuant to its provisions.(18) A contract that rests on an unconstitutional statute creates no obligation to be impaired by subsequent legislation.(19) No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law,(20) and no courts are bound to enforce it.(21) A law contrary to the United States Constitution may not be enforced.(22) Once a statute has been declared unconstitutional, courts thereafter have no jurisdiction over alleged violations.(23) Persons convicted and fined under a statute subsequently held unconstitutional may recover the fines paid.(24)

1 Commissioners of Roads and Revenues of Fulton County v. Davis, 213 Ga. 792, 102 S.E.2d 180 (1958); State v. Village of Garden City, 74 Idaho 513, 265 P.2d 328 (1953); McGuire v. C & L Restaurant Inc., 346 N.W.2d 605 (Minn. 1984); People v. Corley, 91 Misc. 2d 255, 397 N.Y.S.2d 875 (City Crim. Ct. 1977).
2 Lewis v. Uselton, 224 Ga. App. 428, 480 S.E.2d 856 (1997); State ex rel. Stenberg v. Murphy, 247 Neb. 358, 527 N.W.2d 185 (1995); State v. Clark, 367 N.W.2d 168 (N.D. 1985); St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Getty Oil Co., 1989 OK 139, 782 P.2d 915 (Okla. 1989); Weegar v. Bakeberg, 527 N.W.2d 676 (S.D. 1995); Almond v. Day, 197 Va. 419, 89 S.E.2d 851 (1955).
3State v. One Oldsmobile Two-Door Sedan, Model 1946, 227 Minn. 280, 35 N.W.2d 525 (1948); Grieb v. Department of Liquor Control of State, 153 Ohio St. 77, 41 Ohio Op. 148, 90 N.E.2d 691 (1950); Hunter v. School Dist. of Gale-Ettrick-Trempealeau, 97 Wis. 2d 435, 293 N.W.2d 515 (1980).
4 Shirley v. Getty Oil Co., 367 So. 2d 1388 (Ala. 1979); Oliver v. State, 619 So. 2d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1993); Lewis v. Uselton, 224 Ga. App. 428, 480 S.E.2d 856 (1997); Trout v. State, 231 S.W.3d 140 (Mo. 2007); State ex rel. Stenberg v. Murphy, 247 Neb. 358, 527 N.W.2d 185 (1995); Texas Dept. of Family and Protective Services v. Dickensheets, 274 S.W.3d 150 (Tex. App. Houston 1st Dist. 2008).
5 Huffman v. Dawkins, 273 Ark. 520, 622 S.W.2d 159 (1981); Commissioners of Roads and Revenues of Fulton County v. Davis, 213 Ga. 792, 102 S.E.2d 180 (1958); Briggs v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co., Division Textron Am. Inc., 2 Mich. App. 204, 139 N.W.2d 336 (1966), judgment aff'd, 379 Mich. 160, 150 N.W.2d 752 (1967); McGuire v. C & L Restaurant Inc., 346 N.W.2d 605 (Minn. 1984); State ex rel. Stenberg v. Murphy, 247 Neb. 358, 527 N.W.2d 185 (1995); State v. Clark, 367 N.W.2d 168 (N.D. 1985); St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Getty Oil Co., 1989 OK 139, 782 P.2d 915 (Okla. 1989); Glen-Gery Corp. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Dover Tp., 589 Pa. 135, 907 A.2d 1033 (2006); Franks v. State, 772 S.W.2d 428 (Tenn. 1989); School Districts' Alliance for Adequate Funding of Special Educ. v. State, 149 Wash. App. 241, 202 P.3d 990, 242 Ed. Law Rep. 383 (Div. 2 2009); City of Fairmont v. Pitrolo Pontiac-Cadillac Co., 172 W. Va. 505, 308 S.E.2d 527 (1983).
6 Thomas v. North Carolina Dept. of Human Resources, 124 N.C. App. 698, 478 S.E.2d 816 (1996), aff'd, 346 N.C. 268, 485 S.E.2d 295 (1997); Weegar v. Bakeberg, 527 N.W.2d 676 (S.D. 1995).
7 People v. Manuel, 94 Ill. 2d 242, 68 Ill. Dec. 506, 446 N.E.2d 240 (1983); Lovgren v. Peoples Elec. Co., Inc., 380 N.W.2d 791 (Minn. 1986); Nevada Power Co. v. Metropolitan Development Co., 104 Nev. 684, 765 P.2d 1162 (1988); Town of Islip v. Paliotti, 196 A.D.2d 648, 601 N.Y.S.2d 926 (2d Dep't 1993); American Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ingram, 301 N.C. 138, 271 S.E.2d 46 (1980).
8 Commissioners of Roads and Revenues of Fulton County v. Davis, 213 Ga. 792, 102 S.E.2d 180 (1958).
9 Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So. 2d 244 (1941); State ex rel. Stenberg v. Murphy, 247 Neb. 358, 527 N.W.2d 185 (1995); Franks v. State, 772 S.W.2d 428 (Tenn. 1989).
10 People v. Harvey, 379 Ill. App. 3d 518, 318 Ill. Dec. 756, 884 N.E.2d 724 (1st Dist. 2008); State ex rel. Stenberg v. Murphy, 247 Neb. 358, 527 N.W.2d 185 (1995); Nevada Power Co. v. Metropolitan Development Co., 104 Nev. 684, 765 P.2d 1162 (1988); Ethics Com'n of State of Okl. v. Cullison, 1993 OK 37, 850 P.2d 1069 (Okla. 1993); General Motors Corp. v. Oklahoma County Bd. of Equalization, 1983 OK 59, 678 P.2d 233 (Okla. 1983); Franks v. State, 772 S.W.2d 428 (Tenn. 1989); Geeslin v. State Farm Lloyds, 255 S.W.3d 786 (Tex. App. Austin 2008).

As to the effect of and rights under a judgment based upon an unconstitutional law, see Am. Jur. 2d, Judgments § 17.

As to the res judicata effect of a judgment based upon an unconstitutional law, see Am. Jur. 2d, Judgments § 752.

11 Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So. 2d 244 (1941); Franks v. State, 772 S.W.2d 428 (Tenn. 1989).
12 Liddell v. Heavner, 2008 OK 6, 180 P.3d 1191 (Okla. 2008).
13 Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So. 2d 244 (1941).
14 Nevada Power Co. v. Metropolitan Development Co., 104 Nev. 684, 765 P.2d 1162 (1988); Ethics Com'n of State of Okl. v. Cullison, 1993 OK 37, 850 P.2d 1069 (Okla. 1993); Franks v. State, 772 S.W.2d 428 (Tenn. 1989).

As to the limitations to which this rule is subject, see § 196.

15 State ex rel. Stenberg v. Murphy, 247 Neb. 358, 527 N.W.2d 185 (1995).
16 Helvey v. Dawson County Bd. of Equalization, 242 Neb. 379, 495 N.W.2d 261 (1993) (a court may not grant any relief based upon a statute which is nonexistent or a statute which has become nonexistent by reason of a judicial declaration of unconstitutionality).
17 Millet v. Rizzo, 2 So. 2d 244 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941); Board of Managers of James Walker Memorial Hospital of Wilmington v. City of Wilmington, 237 N.C. 179, 74 S.E.2d 749 (1953); State ex rel. Tharel v. Board of Com'rs of Creek County, 1940 OK 468, 188 Okla. 184, 107 P.2d 542 (1940).

As to the effect of a declaration of unconstitutionality on acts performed under it, generally, see § 196.

18 Thomas v. North Carolina Dept. of Human Resources, 124 N.C. App. 698, 478 S.E.2d 816 (1996), aff'd, 346 N.C. 268, 485 S.E.2d 295 (1997).
19 Jones v. Columbian Carbon Co., 132 W. Va. 219, 51 S.E.2d 790 (1948).
20 Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So. 2d 244 (1941); Amyot v. Caron, 88 N.H. 394, 190 A. 134 (1937).
21 Chicago, I. & L.R. Co. v. Hackett, 228 U.S. 559, 33 S. Ct. 581, 57 L. Ed. 966 (1913); Payne v. Griffin, 51 F. Supp. 588 (M.D. Ga. 1943); Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So. 2d 244 (1941).
22 Painter v. Shalala, 97 F.3d 1351 (10th Cir. 1996); Bartlett v. Bowen, 816 F.2d 695 (D.C. Cir. 1987), opinion reinstated on reconsideration, 824 F.2d 1240 (D.C. Cir. 1987).
23 U.S. v. Baucum, 80 F.3d 539 (D.C. Cir. 1996).
24 Neely v. U.S., 546 F.2d 1059, 41 A.L.R. Fed. 331 (3d Cir. 1976).

From: § 195, American Jurisprudence 2d, Volume 16 (Conflict of Laws to Constitutional Law 1-359).
Never Again!
Recognizing the many sad lessons of civilian disarmament and subsequent genocides in the 20th Century, we will make bold and forthright statement: Never Again! We will not submit to the unlawful decrees of tyrants. We will not meekly go their jails and internment camps. We will fight for our liberty, to our dying breath.
Come Armed, Come Masked
I recommend that all adults who publicly assemble at these burn barrel events do so armed, as is our right. And those who come armed should also wear masks, to protect themselves from malicious prosecution. I plan to wear a Guy Fawkes mask, but you can wear a bandana, face muffler, or the face mask of your choice. Joining you, also wearing masks, will be many mayors, sheriffs and their deputies, chiefs of police and their officers, town council members, clergy, and people of all walks of life. We vastly outnumber the tyrants. The tyrants deserve nothing but our scorn and derision. Their fate is already sealed.
Plausible Denial
After this fateful day has come and gone, FFL holders and public officials will be able to recount: "I had no choice. My records were taken by men with guns who were wearing masks!" (So they'll have no excuse if they don't cooperate with this nationwide display of civil disobedience.)
God Bless The Republic. Down with Tyrants. We Will Prevail!
- James Wesley, Rawles - January 28, 2013
Note: Permission to reprint or re-post this piece in full by any method (printed or electronically) is granted by the author (James Wesley, Rawles), as a long as it is not altered in any way and it is reproduced in full.
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
The Mother of All Stats
The Human Cost of "Gun Control" Ideas

The Genocide Chart © 2002
GovernmentDatesTargetsCivilians Killed "Gun Control" Laws Features of Over-all "Gun Control" scheme
Ottoman Turkey1915-1917Armenians
(mostly Christians)
1-1.5 millionArt. 166, Pen. Code, 1866
& 1911 Proclamation, 1915
• Permits required •Government list of owners
•Ban on possession
Soviet Union1929-1945Political opponents;
farming communities
20 millionResolutions, 1918
Decree, July 12, 1920
Art. 59 & 182, Pen. code, 1926
•Licensing of owners
•Ban on possession
•Severe penalties
Nazi Germany
& Occupied Europe
1933-1945Political opponents;
Jews; Gypsies;
critics; "examples"
20 millionLaw on Firearms & Ammun., 1928
Weapon Law, March 18, 1938
Regulations against Jews, 1938
•Registration & Licensing
•Stricter handgun laws
•Ban on possession
China, Nationalist1927-1949Political opponents;
army conscripts; others
10 millionArt. 205, Crim. Code, 1914
Art. 186-87, Crim. Code, 1935
•Government permit system
•Ban on private ownership
China, Red1949-1952
Political opponents;
Rural populations
Enemies of the state
20-35 millionAct of Feb. 20, 1951
Act of Oct. 22, 1957
•Prison or death to "counter-revolutionary criminals" and anyone resisting any government program
•Death penalty for supply guns to such "criminals"
Guatemala1960-1981Mayans & other Indians;
political enemies
Decree 36, Nov 25 •Act of 1932
Decree 386, 1947
Decree 283, 1964
•Register guns & owners •Licensing with high fees
•Prohibit carrying guns
•Bans on guns, sharp tools
•Confiscation powers
Political enemies
300,000Firearms Ordinance, 1955
Firearms Act, 1970
•Register all guns & owners •Licenses for transactions
•Warrantless searches •Confiscation powers
(Khmer Rouge)
1975-1979Educated Persons;
Political enemies
2 millionArt. 322-328, Penal Code
Royal Ordinance 55, 1938
•Licenses for guns, owners, ammunition & transactions
•Photo ID with fingerprints
•License inspected quarterly
Rwanda1994Tutsi people800,000Decree-Law No. 12, 1979•Register guns, owners, ammunition •Owners must justify need •Concealable guns illegal •Confiscating powers

Innocents Betrayed - The History of Gun Control

Watch the 57 minute 53 second Video:

18 USC § 4 - Misprision of Felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

18 USC § 2382 - Misprision of Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

18 USC § 2381 - Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

18 USC § 2383 - Rebellion or Insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

18 USC § 2384 - Seditious Conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.