Showing posts with label 14th amendment. AARP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 14th amendment. AARP. Show all posts

Saturday, January 9, 2016

WHO IS DONALD TRUMP?

Donald Trump—Who He REALLY Is by Chuck Yeager

  • The criticisms of Trump are amazingly missing something.
  • They are lacking in negative stories from those who work for him or have had business dealings with him.
  • After all the employees he’s had and all the business deals he’s made there is a void of criticism.
  • In fact, long term employees call him a strong and merciful leader and say he is far more righteous and of high integrity than people may think.
  • And while it may surprise many, he’s actually humble when it comes to his generosity and kindness.
  • A good example is a story that tells of his limo breaking down on a deserted highway outside of New York City.  A middle-aged couple stopped to help him and as a thank you he paid off their mortgage, but he didn’t brag about that.
  • Generous and good people rarely talk of charity they bestow on others.
  • But as much as all this is interesting, the real thing that people want to know is what Donald Trump’s plan is for America.
  • It’s funny how so many people say they don’t know what it is, or they act like Trump is hiding it. The information is readily available if people would just do a little homework.
  • But, since most Americans won’t do their own research, here, in no particular order, is an overview of many of Trumps positions and plans:
1.) Trump believes that America should not intervene militarily in other country’s problems without being compensated for doing so. If America is going to risk the lives of our soldiers and incur the expense of going to war, then the nations we help must be willing to pay for our help. Using the Iraq War as an example, he cites the huge monetary expense to American taxpayers (over $1.5 trillion, and possibly much more depending on what sources are used to determine the cost) in addition to the cost in human life. He suggests that Iraq should have been required to give us enough of their oil to pay for the expenses we incurred. He includes in those expenses the medical costs for our military and $5 million for each family that lost a loved one in the war and $2 million for each family of soldiers who received severe injuries.

2.) Speaking of the military, Trump wants America to have a strong military again. He believes the single most important function of the federal government is national defense. He has said he wants to find the General Patton or General MacArthur that could lead our military buildup back to the strength it needs to be. While he hasn’t said it directly that I know of, Trump’s attitude about America and about winning tells me he’d most likely be quick to eliminate rules of engagement that handicap our military in battle. Clearly Trump is a “win at all costs” kind of guy, and I’m sure that would apply to our national defense and security, too.

3.) Trump wants a strong foreign policy and believes that it must include 8 core principles (which seem to support my comment in the last point): American interests come first. Always. No apologies. Maximum firepower and military preparedness. Only go to war to win. Stay loyal to your friends and suspicious of your enemies. Keep the technological sword razor sharp. See the unseen. Prepare for threats before they materialize. Respect and support our present and past warriors.

4.) Trump believes that terrorists who are captured should be treated as military combatants, not as criminals like the Obama administration treats them. 

5.) Trump makes the point that China’s manipulation of their currency has given them unfair advantage in our trade dealings with them. He says we must tax their imports to offset their currency manipulation, which will cause American companies to be competitive again and drive manufacturing back to America and create jobs here. Although he sees China as the biggest offender, he believes that America should protect itself from all foreign efforts to take our jobs and manufacturing. For example, Ford is building a plant in Mexico and Trump suggests that every part or vehicle Ford makes in Mexico be taxed 35% if they want to bring it into the U. S., which would cause companies like Ford to no longer be competitive using their Mexican operations and move manufacturing back to the U. S., once again creating jobs here.

6.) Trump wants passage of NOPEC legislation (No Oil Producing and Exporting Cartels Act – NOPEC – S.394), which would allow the government to sue OPEC for violating antitrust laws. According to Trump, that would break up the cartel. He also wants to unleash our energy companies to drill domestically (sound like Sarah Palin’s drill baby, drill?) thereby increasing domestic production creating jobs and driving domestic costs of oil and gas down while reducing dependence on foreign oil.

7.) Trump believes a secure border is critical for both security and prosperity in America. He wants to build a wall to stop illegals from entering put controls on immigration. (And he says he’ll get Mexico to pay for the wall, which many have scoffed at, but given his business successes I wouldn’t put it past him.) He also wants to enforce our immigration laws and provide no path to citizenship for illegals.
8.) Trump wants a radical change to the tax system to not only make it better for average Americans, but also to encourage businesses to stay here and foreign businesses to move here. The resulting influx of money to our nation would do wonders for our economy. He wants to make America the place to do business. He also wants to lower the death tax and the taxes on capital gains and dividends. This would put more than $1.6 trillion back into the economy and help rebuild the 1.5 million jobs we’ve lost to the current tax system. He also wants to charge companies who outsource jobs overseas a 20% tax, but for those willing to move jobs back to America they would not be taxed. And for citizens he has a tax plan that would allow Americans to keep more of what they earn and spark economic growth. He wants to change the personal income tax to: Up to $30,000 taxed at 1%From $30,000 to $100,000 taxed at 5%From $100,000 to $1,000,000 taxed at 10%$1,000,000 and above taxed at 15%.

9.) Trump wants Obamacare repealed. He says it’s a “job-killing, health care-destroying monstrosity” that “can’t be reformed, salvaged, or fixed.” He believes in allowing real competition in the health insurance marketplace to allow competition to drive prices down. He also believes in tort reform to get rid of defensive medicine and lower costs.

10.) Trump wants spending reforms in Washington, acknowledging that America spends far more than it receives in revenue. He has said he believes that if we don’t stop increasing the national debt once it hits $24 trillion it will be impossible to save this country. Even though he says we need to cut spending, he does not want to harm those on Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security. He believes that the citizens have faithfully paid in to the system to have these services available and that the American government has an obligation to fulfill its end of the bargain and provide those benefits. Therefore, he wants to build the economy up so that we have the revenue to pay those costs without cutting the benefits to the recipients. He disagrees with Democrats who think raising taxes is the answer and says that when you do that you stifle the economy. On the other hand, when you lower taxes and create an environment to help businesses they will grow, hire more workers, and those new workers will be paying taxes that become more tax revenue for the government.

11.) Trump also wants reform of the welfare state saying that America needs “a safety net, not a hammock.” He believes in a welfare to work program that would help reduce the welfare roles and encourage people to get back to work. And he wants a crackdown on entitlement fraud.

12.) Trump believes climate change is a hoax.

13.) Trump opposes Common Core.

14.) Trump is pro-life, although he allows for an exception due to rape, incest, or the life of the mother.

15.) Trump is pro 2nd Amendment rights.

16.) Trump’s view on same-sex marriage is that marriage is between a man and a woman, but he also believes that this is a states’ rights issue, not a federal issue. 

17.) Trump supports the death penalty. Trump believes that there is a lack of common sense, innovative thinking in Washington (Hmmm. looks like he believes in horse sense!). He says it’s about seeing the unseen and that’s the kind of thinking we need to turn this country around. He tells a personal story to illustrate the point: “When I opened Trump National Golf Club at Rancho Palos Verdes in Los Angeles, I was immediately told that I would need to build a new and costly ballroom. The current ballroom was gorgeous, but it only sat 200 people and we were losing business because people needed a larger space for their events. Building a new ballroom would take years to get approval and permits (since it’s on the Pacific Ocean), and cost about $5 million. I took one look at the ballroom and saw immediately what needed to be done. The problem wasn’t the size of the room, it was the size of the chairs. They were huge, heavy, and unwieldy. We didn’t need a bigger ballroom, we needed smaller chairs!  So I had them replaced with high-end, smaller chairs. I then had our people sell the old chairs and got more money for them than the cost of the new chairs. In the end, the ballroom went from seating 200 people to seating 320 people. Our visitors got the space they desired, and I spared everyone the hassle of years of construction and $5 million of expense. It’s amazing what you can accomplish with a little common sense.” On top of his saving years of construction and $5 million in expenses, he also was able to keep the ballroom open for business during the time it would have been under remodeling, which allowed him to continue to make money on the space instead of losing that revenue during construction time. Donald Trump’s entire life has been made up of success and winning. He’s been accused of bankruptcies, but that’s not true. He’s never filed personal bankruptcy. He’s bought companies and legally used bankruptcy laws to restructure their debt, just as businesses do all the time. But he’s never been bankrupt personally. He’s a fighter that clearly loves America and would fight for our nation.

Earlier I quoted Trump saying, “I love America. And when you love something, you protect it passionately – fiercely, even.” We never hear that from Democrats or even from most Republicans. Donald Trump is saying things that desperately need to be said but no other candidate has shown the fortitude to stand up and say them. 

Before we criticize someone because of what the media is saying, maybe we should consider what they have to offer. What are they bringing to the table. Researching their background independently of what the news says. What’s their bio?? What is Obama’s bio? If you researched him prior to becoming President, would you have hired him to work for you or run your business?

Sunday, December 27, 2015

HIGH CRIMES

> High Crimes and Misdemeanors at the Obama IRS
>
> Just so we are clear about what's gone down, the same crooked
> administration and the same corrupt federal agencies responsible for
> the IRS-Tea Party scandal now say no crimes were committed. In a
> letter<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/ba6/-k1r/click.emaildirect>
> addressed to the House Ways and Means Committee, Assistant Attorney
> General Peter J. Kadzik, explains why Department of Justice (DOJ)
> declined to press ahead.
>
> "Ineffective management is not a crime," he wrote. And so the Obama
> Justice Department dismissed reams evidence, mostly uncovered by
> Judicial Watch, of obstruction of justice, obstruction of Congress,
> civil rights violations, the illegal release of taxpayer information,
> the illegal use of taxpayer information, unlawful audits, and perjury.
>
> We responded immediately with a statement:
>
> President Obama's IRS was used against his opponents to help him win
> reelection. So the Obama Justice Department's decision to shut down its
> IRS abuse investigation with no prosecutions is as unsurprising as it
> is corrupt. Judicial Watch's independent litigation proved the Obama
> IRS obstructed justice and destroyed evidence. And we uncovered that
> the IRS and Lois Lerner conspired with the Justice Department and FBI
> on a plan to jail the very Americans the IRS was illegally suppressing.
> In fact, Justice Department lawyers recently admitted in federal court
> that the IRS watchdog is still digging through IRS backup tapes and has
> no idea when the search will be complete. This same Justice Department
> decides it can shut down an investigation before it has all the
> evidence? That might pass muster in Chicago, but America deserves
> better - the IRS is not above the law.
>
> Congress needs to get its act together and consider the impeachment and
> removal from office the officials, including Barack Obama, responsible
> for the worst abuse of the IRS in American history. Judicial Watch will
> continue its independent investigation and litigation that has made it
> the best source for the truth about the continuing IRS scandal. In the
> meantime, the Justice Department and FBI, which illegally obtained IRS
> files on Americans with the help of Lois Lerner and the Obama IRS,
> should finally be investigated for their role in Obama's misuse of
> federal law and tax agencies against innocent Americans.
>
> Many thousands of JW supporters have echoed the calls for impeachment
> over the last few months. George Will, one of most influential
> political columnists writing today, recently penned a column entitled
> "Time to impeach the IRS
> director<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/sa6/bk1r/click.emaildirect>":
>
> After [IRS Commissioner John] Koskinen complained about the high cost
> in time and money involved in the search, employees at a West Virginia
> data center told a Treasury Department official that no one asked for
> backup tapes of Lerner's emails. Subpoenaed documents, including 422
> tapes potentially containing 24,000 Lerner emails, were destroyed.
>
> For four months, Koskinen kept from Congress information about Lerner's
> elusive emails. He testified under oath that he had "confirmed" that
> none of the tapes could be recovered.
>
> Lerner conducted government business using private email, and when she
> was told that the IRS's instant messaging system was not archived, she
> replied: "Perfect."
>
> Koskinen's obfuscating testimonies have impeded investigation of
> unsavory practices, including the IRS' sharing, potentially in
> violation of tax privacy laws, up to 1.25 million pages of confidential
> tax documents. Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch, which has forced the IRS
> to disgorge documents, says some "prove that the agency used donor
> lists to audit supporters of organizations engaged in First
> Amendment-protected lawful political speech."
>
> Mr. Will evidently had some good sources on the Hill, as House
> Government Reform Committee Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) introduced a
> resolution<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/ca6/sk1r/click.emaildirect>
> this week to impeach the IRS commissioner for "high crimes and
> misdemeanors." The resolution focuses on the lies and obstruction of
> Obama's IRS henchman in lying to Congress about the Lois Lerner emails.
> According to Chaffetz, Koskinen violated the public trust in the
> following ways:
>
> • Failed to comply with a subpoena resulting in destruction of key
> evidence. Commissioner Koskinen failed to locate and preserve IRS
> records in accordance with a congressional subpoena and an internal
> preservation order. The IRS erased 422 backup tapes containing as many
> as 24,000 of Lois Lerner's emails - key pieces of evidence that were
> destroyed on Koskinen's watch.
>
> • Failed to testify truthfully and provided false and misleading
> information. Commissioner Koskinen testified the IRS turned over all
> emails relevant to the congressional investigation, including all of
> Ms. Lerner's emails. When the agency determined Ms. Lerner's emails
> were missing, Commissioner Koskinen testified the emails were
> unrecoverable. These statements were false.
>
> • Failed to notify Congress that key evidence was missing. The IRS knew
> Lois Lerner's emails were missing in February 2014. In fact, they were
> not missing; the IRS destroyed the emails on March 4, 2014. The IRS did
> not notify Congress the emails were missing until June 2014 - four
> months later, and well after the White House and the Treasury
> Department were notified.
>
> Kudos on this impeachment push on the Lerner email obstruction. It is
> imperfect justice, but a move needed toward accountability. Once again,
> it was Judicial Watch's hard work that resulted in this accountability.
>
> Our historic Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
> lawsuit<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/2a6/ck1r/click.emaildirect>
> seeks documents about the Obama IRS' targeting and harassment of Tea
> Party and conservative opponents of President Obama. Judicial Watch's
> litigation forced the IRS first to admit that Lerner's emails were
> supposedly missing, and then that the emails were on IRS' back-up
> systems<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/8a6/2k1r/click.emaildirect>.
>
> What next? The House Judiciary Committee will have to move to consider
> and approve the proposed articles of impeachment in order to move them
> to consideration by the full House. If a majority of the House
> approves, the issue would move to the Senate for trial. Two-thirds of
> Senators present must then vote to convict and remove Obama's IRS
> commissioner from office.
>
> Interested citizens should focus on sharing their views with members of
> the House Judiciary
> Committee<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/9a6/8k1r/click.emaildirect>,
> chaired Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-VA). Also, in the meantime, individual
> House members can choose to co-sponsor the impeachment resolution. You
> may also want to check in with your individual members to see if
> they're on board.
>
>
> Judicial Watch Uncovers Corrupt Obama CIA-Hollywood Connection
>
> Did you see the link on the Drudge Report and hear the news?!!
>
> We are now in possession of a previously classified December 2012
> Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
> report<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/va6/9k1r/click.emaildirect>
> from the Office of Inspector General (OIG) strongly condemning the
> agency's handling of "briefings, interviews, visits, and other support"
> given to the entertainment industry. The report specifically criticizes
> the CIA's granting of "Secret level" access to the makers of the movie
> Zero Dark Thirty. The OIG report was
> declassified<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/na6/vk1r/click.emaildirect>
> in response to a Judicial Watch
> request<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/ua6/nk1r/click.emaildirect>
> for a Mandatory Declassification review.
>
> The OIG "Report of Audit - CIA Processes for Engaging With the
> Entertainment Industry" is critical of both the agency's procedures and
> its recordkeeping:
>
> We found that the records maintained by the OPA [Office of Public
> Affairs] are not sufficient to document that entertainment industry
> requests to CIA for briefings, interviews, visits, and other support
> are handled in a consistent and fair manner and that engagement with
> the entertainment industry is effective in furthering CIA's goal for
> engagement ... OPA and other CIA employees have not always complied
> with Agency regulations intended to prevent the release of classified
> information during their interactions with entertainment industry
> representatives.
>
> The Washington Times took
> note<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/ga6/uk1r/click.emaildirect>
> of what your JW has uncovered shortly after the information was
> released. Here is how it was reported:
>
> The CIA may have mishandled "briefings, interviews, visits and other
> support" given to the entertainment industry, says a previously
> classified report, now declassified and provided to Judicial Watch
> under a Freedom of Information Act request.
>
> The report specifically criticizes the CIA's granting of "secret level"
> access to the makers of the 2012 movie "Zero Dark Thirty," which
> dramatized the hunt for Osama bin Laden and the raid on his hideout in
> Pakistan.
>
> Our astute readers know how hard it is pry information loose from the
> agencies that are not tasked with espionage, intelligence gathering and
> covert operations. So just imagine how hard it is to shake information
> loose from the CIA.
>
> While the heavily redacted document carefully avoids the disclosure of
> the eight projects it reviewed dating back to January 6, 2006, it
> specifically cites problems involving the CIA's interactions with the
> Zero Dark Thirty filmmakers. According to the OIG report, "There was an
> instance in which CIA allowed an entertainment industry representative
> to attend a CIA event in which information classified at the SECRET
> level was discussed." The report then adds in a footnote:
>
> CIA officials told us that the filmmaker involved with Zero Dark Thirty
> was invited to the event so that he could absorb the emotion of the
> event and that he was told he could not use anything he heard at the
> event for his project. During our audit fieldwork, the then Director,
> CIA called for an internal examination of the decision to allow the
> entertainment industry representative to attend the event.
>
> The CIA Inspector General cites one project in particular that was
> given "significantly more support" than any of the others reviewed.
> Though the project is not identified, it is an apparent reference to
> Zero Dark Thirty:
>
> [W]e noted that the CIA provided significantly more support to one of
> the eight entertainment industry projects that we reviewed: [REDACTED].
> Entertainment industry representatives for this project met with
> [REDACTED] CIA officers (the majority of whom were under cover) ... on
> multiple occasions, including meeting with one officer 12 times.
>
> The newly-released OIG report also questioned the CIA's granting of
> access to foreign nationals who may not have received proper screening
> before their briefings, warning of possible "negative consequences" for
> the CIA:
>
> We also noted three entertainment projects [REDACTED] in which foreign
> nationals may have participated in briefings, interviews, and visits
> provided by the CIA. However, because of the lack of adequate records,
> we were unable to determine the extent of CIA's support to the eight
> projects, the extent to which foreign nationals participated in
> CIA-sponsored activities, and whether the Director, OPA approved of the
> activities and participation of foreign nationals.
>
> Failure on the part of CIA officers to adhere to regulatory
> requirements could result in unauthorized disclosures, inappropriate
> actions and negative consequences for CIA. [Emphasis added]
>
> The CIA IG also concluded that taxpayers were not compensated for the
> assistance CIA provided to Hollywood film projects:
>
> CIA Has Not Been Reimbursed for Costs Incurred in Supporting
> Entertainment Industry Projects ...
>
> The CIA needs to establish a written policy concerning under what
> conditions reimbursement of costs incurred in providing support to
> entertainment industry projects should be sought. In the absence of a
> formal policy, there is increased risk that costs incurred by CIA will
> not be handled in a consistent manner and that CIA funds may be used
> for questionable expenditures.
>
> On May 1, 2011, President Obama announced that American personnel had
> killed al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in Abbottabad, Pakistan, and
> buried his body at sea. President Obama ordered the withholding of
> photos and video of the deceased bin Laden and his burial at sea,
> claiming it would be unwise to "spike the football" over bin Laden's
> killing, as it might be offensive to al Qaeda and other terrorists.
>
> Judicial Watch immediately requested these photos from the Defense
> Department and CIA and then, when denied them, sued for their release
> in federal court. An appellate court
> upheld<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/xk6/gk1r/click.emaildirect>
> President Obama's decision to withhold the records from American
> citizens because the records might offend terrorists.
>
> Other Judicial Watch
> litigation<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/ik6/xj1r/click.emaildirect>
> forced the release of records showing a cover-up and the dangerous
> disclosure of classified information, as the Obama administration
> sought to promote the raid to aid Obama's reelection, while at the same
> time withholding basic information about the raid from the American
> people.
>
> In
> response<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/lk6/ij1r/click.emaildirect>
> to the Judicial Watch January 2012 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
> lawsuit concerning the unusual access given to Zero Dark Thirty
> filmmakers, CIA Information Review Officer Martha Lutz conceded:
>
> It is my understanding that when the meetings with the filmmakers took
> place at the CIA Headquarters, the guidance provided to the officers
> who were undercover or were otherwise in sensitive positions was that
> they should provide the filmmakers with their true first names only.
>
> Disclosures by Vice
> News<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/ak6/lj1r/click.emaildirect>
> last month highlighted even more corruption at the Obama CIA as the
> agency tried to promote the pro-Obama film for the White House. Vice
> News reported that the CIA OIG found several potential violations of
> criminal law by then-CIA Director Leon Panetta, CIA officials, and the
> filmmakers.
>
> Has anyone been held accountable for these illegal leaks? Especially
> since the leaks put the heroes who killed Osama bin Laden at risk in
> order to help make this film.
>
> Given the IRS cover-up described above, you won't be surprised to learn
> that Vice News reported the Obama Justice Department refused to
> prosecute any of the alleged violations.
>
> The CIA responded to Judicial Watch's disclosure in a statement to
> Reuters<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/kk6/aj1r/click.emaildirect>:
>
> CIA spokesman Ryan Trapani said the agency had "completely overhauled
> its procedures for interaction with the entertainment industry" since
> 2012. The agency set up new training procedures for officials who deal
> with Hollywood and strengthened protocols for guarding agency secrets
> and classified information, he said.
>
> Believe you me, we're following up on this.
>
> In the meantime, we know now the Obama administration put Hollywood
> before national security in order to help Barack Obama win reelection.
>
>
> Judicial Watch Sues Obama HHS for Records on Planned Parenthood Connection
>
> You may have seen undercover videos by investigators with the Center
> with Medical Progress (CMP)
> featuring<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/3a6/wk1r/click.emaildirect>
> Planned Parenthood's Dr. Deborah Nucatola discussing the sale of tissue
> from aborted human beings and how abortion techniques can be altered to
> preserve intact human organs and limbs for sale.
>
> Over a glass of wine and casual lunch conversation caught in the
> undercover video, Nucatola, senior director of medical services at
> Planned Parenthood, let slip how inhuman, cruel and soulless her
> organization is when it comes to human life. It was back on July 25,
> 2014, that Nucatola made comments to undercover investigators posing as
> representatives from a human biologics company looking to purchase
> human body parts. Nucatola also describes the gruesome process through
> which abortionists operate to preserve specific fetal body parts. An
> undercover video entitled: "Planned Parenthood Uses Partial-Birth
> Abortions to Sell Baby
> Parts<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/ta6/3k1r/click.emaildirect>"
> has gone viral thanks to the Center for Medical Progress' good work.
>
> Following up on public interest in this truly disturbing scandal,
> Judicial Watch just filed a federal lawsuit here in DC for contracts
> between the Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Population
> Affairs and Nucatola for her paid
> work<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/4a6/tk1r/click.emaildirect>
> on the 2014 government
> report<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/ya6/4k1r/click.emaildirect>
> "Providing Quality Family Planning Services" (Judicial Watch v. U.S.
> Department of Health & Human
> Services<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/0a6/yk1r/click.emaildirect>
> (No. 1:15-cv-01697)).
>
> The Left does not want you or other Americans to know the truth about
> the abortion industry's trafficking in the body parts of human beings
> killed by abortion. I encourage you to view
> all<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/ea6/0k1r/click.emaildirect>
> the Planned Parenthood videos, but warn you that they are difficult to
> view and may upset you.
>
> Judicial Watch filed our lawsuit after HHS failed to comply with two
> simple August 10, 2015, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests
> seeking a set of records about the Planned Parenthood doctor:
>
> • Records related to contracts and/or consultancy agreement between the
> CDC and Dr. Deborah Nucatola regarding her work on the report
> "Providing Quality Family Planning Services," released April 25, 2014;
>
> • Records concerning contracts and/or consultancy agreement between the
> CDC and Dr. Deborah Nucatola regarding her work on the report "Sexually
> Transmitted Diseases Treatment Guidelines," released June 5, 2015;
>
> • Records regarding contracts and/or consultancy agreement between the
> CDC and Dr. Deborah Nucatola regarding her work on the "U.S. Selected
> Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use," released in 2013.
>
> You'll see
> here<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/ya6/4k1r/click.emaildirect>
> that the controversial 2014 so-called "Family Planning" report for the
> Center for Disease Control (CDC) and the Office of Population Affairs
> recommends that counselors provide abortion options and referrals to
> pregnant women and teenagers (without parental consent). The report
> also promotes providing "adolescents," without parental consent,
> contraception (which includes potentially abortion-inducing drugs).
> Planned Parenthood's fingerprints are all over the "abortions for
> teenaged girls without telling their parents" Obama administration
> advocacy document.
>
> That Nucatola is helping set government policy on sensitive
> life-and-death issues is concerning.
>
> According to
> CMP<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/3a6/wk1r/click.emaildirect>,
> its undercover investigators, posing as buyers for a company seeking
> fetal tissue, ask Nucatola:
>
> "How much of a difference can that actually make, if you know kind of
> what's expected, or what we need?"
>
> "It makes a huge difference," Nucatola replies. "I'd say a lot of
> people want liver. And for that reason, most providers will do this
> case under ultrasound guidance, so they'll know where they're putting
> their forceps. The kind of rate-limiting step of the procedure is
> calvarium. Calvarium-the head-is basically the biggest part."
>
> Nucatola explains, "We've been very good at getting heart, lung, liver,
> because we know that, so I'm not gonna crush that part, I'm gonna
> basically crush below, I'm gonna crush above, and I'm gonna see if I
> can get it all intact."
>
> "And with the calvarium, in general, some people will actually try to
> change the presentation so that it's not vertex," she continues. "So if
> you do it starting from the breech presentation, there's dilation that
> happens as the case goes on, and often, the last step, you can evacuate
> an intact calvarium at the end."
>
> The undercover videos raised questions about whether Planned Parenthood
> was illegally profiting from the sale of the fetal tissue and violating
> other laws, such as the federal ban on partial birth abortions.
>
> For the record, there is no doubt about the authenticity of the
> undercover videos. As the Daily
> Signal<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/-a6/ek1r/click.emaildirect>
> has reported, a forensic analysis of the videos has already been done
> that shows they are the real deal:
>
> The analysis was completed by Coalfire, a digital security and
> forensics firm that has worked on civil and criminal investigations.
> The firm had access to all audio and video investigative footage
> recorded by the Center for Medical Progress.
>
> "The Coalfire forensic analysis removes any doubt that the full length
> undercover videos released by Center for Medical Progress are authentic
> and have not been manipulated," said Casey Mattox, senior counsel at
> Alliance Defending Freedom. "Analysts scrutinized every second of video
> recorded during the investigation and released by CMP to date and found
> only bathroom breaks and other non-pertinent footage had been removed."
>
> The Obama administration is in cover-up mode on how it uses tax dollars
> to fund and promote Planned Parenthood's anti-human ideology.
>
> You should be outraged that the Obama HHS won't even respond to our
> simple Freedom of Information Act request for taxpayer-funded contracts
> with one of the nation's leading abortionists caught red-handed
> discussing how to preserve the body parts of human beings killed by
> abortions so that those parts can be sold for higher prices. The Obama
> gang would rather violate the federal transparency law in order to
> protect taxpayer funding for activists and groups that traffic in body
> parts. Does it get any worse in terms of government corruption?
>
>
> Until next week...
>
> [https://col131.mail.live.com/Handlers/ImageProxy.mvc?bicild=&canary=t5%2bQfhF8mTXmBhhC5IwCrD9dAE4fUA4Hd5iojRFeZFA%3d0&url=http%3a%2f%2fimages2.judicialwatch.org%2fclients%2fJudicialWatch2195%2fImages%2fsig.png]
> Tom Fitton
> President
>
>
> [Make a
> Contribution]<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/wa6/1k1r/click.emaildirect>
>
>
>
> [Visit
> JudicialWatch.org]<http://go2.judicialwatch.org/l/a/74i/l7/mahr/cl6/sa1r/click.emaildirect>
> 425 3rd St, SW Suite 800
> Washington, D.C. 20024