Congress wants to bring President into court...

Congressmen Want to Bring Obama to Court for Not Faithfully Executing Laws

30 members support the House Resolution calling for civil action.

1:49 PM, Dec 12, 2013• By DANIEL HALPER

President Obama’s Administrative provided a waiver initiative for the welfare work requirement under TANF without involving Congress.

So far, 29 members of Congress are co-sponsoring Rice's Resolution: Bachmann (MN-06), Bridenstine (OK-01), Chaffetz (UT-03), J. Duncan (SC-03), DeSantis (FL-06), Franks (AZ-08), Gowdy (SC-04), Harris (MD-01), Lamborn (CO-05), LaMalfa (CA-01), Marino (PA-10), McClintock (CA-04), Meadows (NC-11), Nunnelee (MS-01), Pittenger (NC-09), Posey (FL-08), Tom Price (GA-06), Ribble (WI-08), Salmon (AZ-05), Sanford (SC-01), Schweikert (AZ-06), Stewart (UT-02), Stockman (TX-36), Walberg (MI-07), Weber (TX-14), Wenstrup (OH-02), Williams (TX-25), Joe Wilson (SC-02), and Yoho FL-03.

Here's full resolution, which is expected to be filed with the House clerk's office very soon:

RESOLUTION

Directing the House of Representatives to bring a civil action for declaratory or injunctive relief to challenge certain policies and actions taken by the executive branch.

Whereas President Obama and officials in his administration have frequently overstepped the limits placed on executive branch power by the Constitution;

Whereas because of President Obama’s continuing failure to faithfully execute the laws, his administration’s actions cannot be addressed by the enactment of new laws, be- cause Congress cannot assume that the President will execute the new laws any more faithfully than the laws he has already ignored, leaving Congress with no legislative remedy to prevent the establishment of what is in effect an imperial presidency; and

Whereas it is therefore necessary and appropriate for Congress to turn to the courts to ensure the faithful execution of the laws as required by the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved,

Earth has lost 98% of its atmosphere...

My book research for COSMOLOGICAL ICE AGES shows that after our sun was born in Orion and drifted out into the cold of space Earth froze up for a billion years known as the Huronian Glaciation. A billion years is a long time for nothing to happen. One mile deep ice covered the single ocean and a five-mile deep sheet of ice covered the single continent. 

Eventually our solar system drifted between the two-solar mass stars Procyon and Sirius. There was no way to get out of the billion years ice age because Earth had a 750 PSI atmosphere that was over 3,000 miles deep. You would never see the sun with such an atmosphere. There are times when you can't see the sun today with only a 14.5 psi atmosphere that is only 60-miles deep.

FYI: Venus is much closer to the sun than Earth and it still has a high pressure atmosphere of 117 pounds per square inch which is more than 100 times what we have on Earth right now.

Eventually our got captured by Sirius. Little Sirius B, the size of Earth but with 1.5 solar mass putting out more than 100 times the UV light of our sun conducive to plant growth. Little Sirius B with 1.5 solar mass grabbed hold of our sun putting us in orbit around Sirius A and we had multiple suns in the sky but you could only see Sirius A and B not the sun because the atmosphere was still at around 700 PSI.

Eventually a hundred million years of photosynthesis took the atmosphere down to around 300 PSI during the Carboniferous 380-million years ago. Photosynthesis removed the carbon CO2 atmosphere down releasing free oxygen with photosynthesis as coal 100 feet thick and limestone in the shallow seas was created 12,500 feet thick in some places. You got to understand that to make one foot of hard coal (anthracite) takes 40 feet of trees and grass compressed down. A hundred foot layer of coal took 4000 feet of plant growth. We are not seeing such plant growth today because Earth has lost 98% of its atmospher! 

Diatoms, with the unique ability to multiply 5 times in 24 hours given 24 hours of light from multiple suns completely filled up ocean basins. Incoming meteors instantly united the hydrogen and oxygen in the water with the calcium carbonate to make hydrocarbons crude oil. Most oil basins are ancient meteor impact zones...check it out.

I could have not written this book twenty years ago because the data wasn't available. I used every available field of science including Antarctic Ice Core graphs of methane, CO2, temperature and snow fall. Campbell and Moore tallied up the red shift of 2149 near by bright stars to determine that our solar system is traveling toward Hercules at 19.5 kilometers per second. I drew a line from Hercules through the middle of a star constellation chart extending beyond the middle and it winds up in Orion. Orion is a birthplace for stars and it is the nearest birthplace so we (our sun) must have been born in Orion. We were in a tight orbit around Sirius for 750-million years. The light from these objects created our carbon resources not the sun. 

Right now we are traveling toward Sirius A and B at 7.5 kilometer per second. Our solar system's mass is 2.0 e 30. Sirius A and B has a mass of 6.8 e 30. Procyon has a mass of about 6 e 30. The galaxy gravity is in that direction transmitted in a Fibonacci spiral through billions of stars. To calculate gravity you have to multiply mass difference times four due to the galaxy gravity behind these objects.  
Our orbit period id 105,000 years which matches Ice Ages.


Eight years ago Scientists measured the lung cavities of dinosaurs to determine that Earth's atmosphere 65-+ million years ago had to be around 30 to 60 PSI to keep the animals alive because their lungs were too small. 

Scientists in Washington State measured the fossil remains of rain to discover the drops were much smaller theorizing that the air pressure had to be double what it is today. 
  

Higher Oxygen & Air Pressure: The Necessities

Both evolutionists and many creationists believe the earth, at one time, had higher oxygen levels then it does today. Many evolutionists, in fact, propose that low levels of oxygen led to the extinction of the dinosaurs (coupled with other factors). The reasons for this belief are abundant, and some of them we will touch upon.

The timetables for which these environmental altering events occurred, however, are vastly different between the evolutionist and creationist. The former places such changes during the periods of the Triassic, Jurassic, etc., millions of years ago. The latter places the changes during one cataclysmic event, with that event having occurred only some thousands of years ago. The two perspectives are polar opposites, and yet, share a bit of common ground.

For one, both see that higher oxygen levels and great air pressure are necessities. Realize that when we use the word both, we are not speaking of both camps entirely. There are obviously differing views.

Why are such conditions necessities? Here are some reasons.


Higher Oxygen: Evidence & Reasons

Big Bugs & Research At ASU[17]

Evolutionary scientists know full-well that dragonflies as large as hawks and cockroaches big enough to take on house cats thrived during the Paleozoic era (245-570 million years ago, according to their timescale). One physiologist, John Harrison, has been particularly fascinated with such creatures. Harrison is a professor of biology at Arizona State University, and wanted to know why insects of long ago grew to be so large. He and his colleagues believed the answer to be in how insects breathe, and they are busy studying how the respiratory physiology of modern insects affects their body size.

Air breathing animals breathe with lungs. Insects, rather than lungs, breathe with a network of tiny tubes called tracheae. Air enters the tubes through a row of holes along an insect’s abdomen, and then diffuses down the blind-ended tracheae. In terms of the subject at hand, it is here where the rubber meets the road, because the distance oxygen can travel down the tracheae is dependant upon its concentration in the air. Theoretically, then, if atmospheric oxygen is doubled, it will make it twice as far. If an insect has a longer trachea, therefore, one should expect that the insect will need higher oxygen to breathe.

The question is, can all this be tested? In an attempt to do just that, Harrison studied and continues to study some of the larger insects of our day in his ASU laboratory; namely grasshoppers and dragonflies. What he has found is revealing. The insects’ activity is affected by the amount of oxygen in the atmosphere, and just as the theory predicts, the effect is more pronounced in the largest specimens. The biggest bugs have the longest trachea, and therefore need the most oxygen.

For the remaining skeptics, there is one last test that should be made ... and has been made. If the theory be true, then smaller insects with shorter trachea should be able to deliver adequate oxygen to the tissues even in a low-oxygen atmosphere, and this difference should be most obvious when the smaller and larger insects are forced to engage in oxygen consuming activity, such as flying or jumping.

Simply put, this is exactly what Harrison has seen in his laboratory, and not with different kinds of insects, but with different sizes of the same kind of insect.

Harrison and graduate student Scott Kirkton tested the aerobic performance of grasshoppers given varying amounts of oxygen, and found that smaller grasshoppers can hop nonstop in atmospheric oxygen levels lower then that of our own (21%). In fact, the smallest grasshoppers didn't even have problems in oxygen as low as 5%.

As for the larger grasshoppers? They were quite the contrast from their smaller brothers and sisters, as they tired out faster and their hopping rates rapidly dropped to zero. When extra doses of oxygen were given, however, they began jumping more, strongly suggesting an oxygen-stimulated boost which increased their performance.

The same was seen with dragonflies. As has been shared, fossil dragonflies the size of hawks have been discovered. A dragonfly of such size calls for a dragonfly with a long trachea, and in experiments where oxygen levels were greatly reduced, the dragonflies, not even half as large as their fossil ancestors, went from effortless flight to desperate exertion. The specimens couldn't even get off the ground at the lowest oxygen levels!

This is because the flight muscle of an insect burns more oxygen than any other animal tissue, and scientists know this well. It is a powerful, beautifully designed machine, depending on oxygen to run akin to a car depending on gas. The fact is this: the amount of oxygen supplied to an insect’s muscles, such as those of a dragonfly, directly depends on the amount of oxygen in the air. Therefore, the results of Harrison's experiments make perfect sense, and shed light on the type of atmosphere insects of such large size, such as dragonflies, grasshoppers, etc., would need in order to survive.

Arguments & Objections

As stated before, many evolutionists believe the earth had higher oxygen levels in the past (millions of years ago), as do many creationists (before the flood, thousands of years ago). Some creationists, however, are reluctant to believe such, citing that the Bible isn't clear on the subject and that other factors could contribute to gigantism in the insect world. True, but the Bible isn't clear on a number of scientific subjects, so it is an empty argument. Also, such creationists who cite the contrary do not provide plausible explanations.

Some espouse that gigantism was a result of purer genes, which consequently mutated after the flood (as a result of bottleneck). This argument, however, holds little weight, as flood-believers know full well that insects were not taken on the ark, and therefore would not have had a bottleneck problem (where a small number of individuals were left to breed. Insects can survive flood scenarios better than animals can).

The second argument is that some insects can increase oxygen delivery by a mechanical pumping action of their bodies, and therefore aren't as dependant on oxygen levels. While this is true of some insects, it doesn't explain all of them. Furthermore, and more importantly, Harrison's experiments strongly refute such an argument. The larger grasshoppers and dragonflies were not able to cope with lower oxygen levels, while the smaller specimens were able to. It is clear, then, that the larger grasshoppers and dragonflies were not able to utilize any type of pumping action to accommodate their altered environment.

The third and final objection is that not all fossil insects are of large proportions. Notice that this argument fails to deal with the ones that are large. Consequently, it is irrelevant.

In short, both evolutionists and creationists who take umbrage against the theory need to provide convincing counter-arguments. The evidence can't be ignored.


Greater Air Pressure: Evidence & Reasons

Quetzalcoatlus & The Problem Of Overheating[18]

Even if we could bring dinosaurs back to life, it wouldn't be enough, says Octave Levenspiel, an emeritus professor of chemical engineering at Abiqua State University. According to him, one thing stands in the way, and that's the earth's present atmosphere, which may be only one-eighth as dense as it was many years ago.

"Today's South American condors - with their 12-foot wingspans and 25-pound weight - are the largest creatures that can support and propel themselves through the air according to basic aerodynamic principles," said Levenspiel. "The pterosaur quetzalcoatlus had a wingspan of more than 45 feet - half that of a Boeing 737 - and weighed more than 150 pounds. Either it couldn't fly - but it did or the atmosphere had to be much denser at the time."

Levenspiel postulates the earth's atmosphere was at least eight times denser "100 million years ago." Much less power is needed to fly at greater atmospheric pressures, so such conditions would have given the largest pterosaurs a much easier time flying.

Not only that, but according to Levenspiel, the giant land-dwelling dinosaurs would overheat today for the same reason. "When creatures become very large, they have more trouble removing heat," he said. "A denser atmosphere removes heat faster. An atmosphere eight times denser would have allowed the giant dinosaurs to survive."

In other words, sticking a large dinosaur in a modern-day theme park wouldn't just be a walk in the park. Your dinosaurs would, sadly again, go extinct.

Arguments & Objections

Some simply think the Quetzalcoatlus could fly in an atmosphere like ours today. Like a hand glider, it would have just needed to pick a suitable spot with enough distance to run and height enough to jump from. Obviously, such a situation would be awkward, and just plain silly. As for large dinosaurs and overheating, it is possible that they possessed some type of internal mechanism for keeping them cool, but evidence of such has not been found.

Greater Air Pressure: Evidence & Reasons

Ancient Amber & Ancient Air[18]

As displayed above, many articles have appeared in recent years discussing the topic of ancient amber and oxygen levels. In short, the evidence seems clear. Earth's atmosphere once contained more oxygen, specifically around 35% (as opposed to today's 21%). Tiny bubbles of ancient air trapped by successive flows of tree resin have been discovered in ancient amber, and analyses of the gases in these bubbles reveal these startling numbers. Lest the skeptic argue insufficient testing, the results were based on more than 300 analyses by USGS scientists. Interestingly, the amber samples were also from different evolutionary periods ... the Cretaceous, Tertiary, etc., and even came from 16 world sites. The oldest sample tested was said to be about 130 million years old.

Arguments & Objections

The only argument given (and a very poor one) is the idea that some amber bubbles don't contain such high levels of oxygen. Notice that this argument is identical to the one in reference to large insects ... that is, "that not all fossil insects are of large proportions." As stated earlier, so we'll state again. This argument fails to deal with the samples that do contain higher oxygen levels. Furthermore, it is easier to make sense of amber bubbles that contain lower oxygen levels, as leakage could have taken place. However, endeavoring to make sense of amber bubbles that contain more oxygen is indeed rather a more difficult task.

Solutions for gun control

GOVERNMENT CENSORS PROTESTS on YOUTUBE

Consciousness TV | Government Orders YouTube To Censor Protest Videos

• 4 Comments

i

1 Vote

In a frightening example of how the state is tightening its grip around the free Internet, it has emerged that You Tube is complying with thousands of requests from governments to censor and remove videos that show protests and other examples of citizens simply asserting their rights, while also deleting search terms by government mandate.

The latest example is You Tube’s compliance with a request from the British government to censor footage of the British Constitution Group Lawful Rebellion protest, during which they attempted to civilly arrest Judge Michael Peake at Birkenhead county court.

Peake was ruling on a case involving Roger Hayes, former member of UKIP, who has refused to pay council tax, both as a protest against the government’s treasonous activities in sacrificing Britain to globalist interests and as a result of Hayes clearly proving that council tax is illegal.

Hayes has embarked on an effort to legally prove that the enforced collection of council tax by government is unlawful because no contract has been agreed between the individual and the state. His argument is based on the sound legal principle that just like the council, Hayes can represent himself as a third party in court and that “Roger Hayes” is a corporation and must be treated as one in the eyes of the law.

The British government doesn’t want this kind of information going viral in the public domain because it is scared stiff of a repeat of the infamous poll tax riots of 1990, a massive tax revolt in the UK that forced the Thatcher government to scrap the poll tax altogether because of mass civil disobedience and refusal to pay.

When viewers in the UK attempt to watch videos of the protest, they are met with the message, “This content is not available in your country due to a government removal request.”

We then click through to learn that, “YouTube occasionally receives requests from governments around the world to remove content from our site, and as a result, YouTube may block specific content in order to comply with local laws in certain countries.”

You can also search by country to discover that Google, the owner of You Tube, has complied with the majority of requests from governments, particularly in the United States and the UK, not only to remove You Tube videos, but also specific web search terms and thousands of “data requests,” meaning demands for information that would reveal the true identity of a You Tube user. Google claims that the information sent to governments is “needed for legitimate criminal investigations,” but whether these “data requests” have been backed up by warrants is not divulged by the company.

“Between July 1 and Dec. 31 (2009), Google received 3,580 requests for user data from U.S. government agencies, slightly less than the 3,663 originating from Brazil,” reports PC World. “The United Kingdom and India sent more than 1,000 requests each, and smaller numbers originated from various other countries.”

With regard to search terms, one struggles to understand how a specific combination of words in a Google search can be considered a violation of any law. This is about government and Google working hand in hand to manipulate search results in order to censor inconvenient information, something which Google now freely admits to doing.

You Tube’s behavior is more despicable than the Communist Chinese, who are at least open about their censorship policies, whereas You Tube hides behind a blanket excuse and doesn’t even say what law has been broken.

Anyone who swallows the explanation that the videos were censored in this case because the government was justifiably enforcing a law that says scenes from inside a court room cannot be filmed is beyond naive. Court was not even in session in the protest footage that was removed, and the judge had already left the courtroom.

The real reason for the removal is the fact that the British government is obviously petrified of seeing a group of focused and educated citizens, black, white, old and young, male and female, go head to head with the corrupt system on its own stomping ground.

In their efforts to keep a lid on the growing populist fury that has arrived in response to rampant and growing financial and political tyranny in every sector of society, governments in the west are now mimicking Communist Chinese-style Internet censorship policies in a bid to neutralize protest movements, while hypocritically lecturing the rest of the world on maintaining web freedom.

Via a combination of cybersecurity legislation and policy that is hastily introduced with no real oversight, governments and large Internet corporations are crafting an environment where the state can simply demand information be removed on a whim with total disregard for freedom of speech protections.

This was underscored last year at the height of the Wikileaks issue, when Amazon axed Wikileaks from its servers following a phone call made by Senator Joe Lieberman’s Senate Homeland Security Committee demanding the website be deleted.

Lieberman has been at the forefront of a push to purge the Internet of all dissent by empowering Obama with a figurative Internet kill switch that he would use to shut down parts of the Internet or terminate websites under the guise of national security. Lieberman spilled the beans on the true reason for the move during a CNN interview when he stated “Right now China, the government, can disconnect parts of its Internet in case of war and we need to have that here too.”

Except that China doesn’t disconnect the Internet “in case of war,” it only ever does so to censor and intimidate people who express dissent against government atrocities or corruption, as we have documented. This is precisely the kind of online environment the British and American governments are trying to replicate as they attempt to put a stranglehold on the last bastion of true free speech – the world wide web.

WHY PEOPLE ARE POOR...

I  don't know but do you think there might be a nexus here somewhere?


VERY INTERESTING ALL THE WAY TO THE END....


10 Poorest Cities in America and how did it happen?


City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level 




1. Detroit , MI 32.5%


2. Buffalo , NY 29.9%


3. Cincinnati, OH 27.8%


4. Cleveland , OH 27.0%


5. Miami , FL 26.9%


6. St. Louis , MO 26.8%


7. El Paso , TX 26.4%


8. Milwaukee , WI 26.2%


9. Philadelphia, PA 25.1%


10. Newark , NJ 24.2%




U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August              2007


What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common?


Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961


Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954


Cincinnati, OH - (3rd)..since 1984


Cleveland, OH - (4th).. since 1989


Miami, FL - (5th) has never had a Republican mayor


St. Louis, MO - (6th)..since 1949


El Paso, TX - (7th) has never had a Republican mayor


Milwaukee , WI - (8th)..since 1908


Philadelphia, PA - (9th).. since 1952


Newark, NJ - (10th)...since 1907. 


Einstein once said, 
'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.' 


It is the poor who habitually elect Democrats ... yet they are still POOR.


"You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. 


You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.       


You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.       


You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. 


You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. 


You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence.       


You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves." --Abraham Lincoln


Then you have the fractional reserve banking system siphoning money out of the economy... There is no money available for them to start a business.

ALL BLOGS & SOCIAL NETWORKS BANNED --INTERNET CENSORING BILL

Internet Takeover Bill

United States Justice Foundation

932 "D" Street, Suite 2

Ramona, California 92065

760-788-6624   USJF.NET

01/10/2012

Dear Kenneth,

The final U. S. Senate vote on the internet takeover bill is set for January 24th.  As of right now, that bill, which gives U. S. Attorney General Eric Holder the power of an "Internet Czar,” WILL PASS.

Please send faxes to every Member of the U.S. Senate, and demand that they filibuster S. 968, the Senate version of the internet takeover bill.

Unfortunately, the American people are not paying attention to this catastrophe that is unfolding in the U. S. Senate.  We only have a few days to stop this unconstitutional power grab.  We must bombard the Senate with faxes, RIGHT NOW!

This bill will give corrupt U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder the power to blacklist or shut down any website or forum that is merely accused of being linked to "online piracy”.

He will even have the authority to "sanitize” the results of internet searches on Google or Yahoo, so that only government-approved websites and information can be found online.

If this bill passes, Barack Hussein Obama will have to the ability to ban the campaign websites of his opponents, shut down the online activities of anti-Obama groups like USJF, and harass tea party forums and any other website that don't support him.

Please fax the U. S. Senate now.  This bill WILL PASS unless the American people overwhelm the Senate with faxes!

And, while you are at it, please forward this email to everyone in your lists.

The FINAL U. S. Senate vote is scheduled for January 24th.  We don't have much time!

If this bill passes, the Obama Administration won't need a court order.  There will be no hearings or trials.

Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., will seize incredible control over the internet, and we will be nearly powerless to stop him.

Although supporters of the bill say that it is designed to prevent online piracy, this is an internet takeover bill, pure and simple.

Just one "complaint” from a liberal activist, or a government agent, that you are indirectly violating an obscure copyright rule, and your website could be fined huge sums, and it could be blacklisted from the internet.

Just imagine if Google was prohibited from displaying websites that were critical of Barack Obama, that discussed the controversy over where he was born, or that mentioned the damage that his policies are doing to the economy.

Well, that is exactly what will ultimately happen if S.968 passes, and it is signed into law.

Many of this bill's provisions are modeled on Communist China's censorship law, called the "Great Firewall of China.”

Even the socialists in the European Parliament oppose this new American law.

That is how extreme S.968 is!

S.968 already has 40 co-sponsors in the U.S. Senate.   Eleven more votes and it passes!

Please fax every U. S. Senator NOW.

Extreme liberals like Chuck Schumer and Al Franken have teamed up with Republicans like John McCain and Lindsey Graham to ram this bill into law.

They are being helped by millions of dollars in campaign contributions from  left-wing mainstream media companies.

They want the government to shut down all the blogs and political forums, and all of the independent news sites, so that they, once again, will have a monopoly on the news that you and I are allowed to see.

This threat against free speech is so grave and so imminent that websites like Google and Yahoo are seriously considering staging a last-ditch online protest to try to stop Mr. Obama and his Congressional allies!

Please, fax every Member of the U. S. Senate NOW, and please forward this email to all of your friends, urging them to do the same.

This bill WILL PASS unless you take action TODAY.

And, while you are at it, please add to the effectiveness of your faxes by personally calling your U.S. Senators' offices at 202-224-3121.  Tell him, or her, to STOP S. 968, the internet takeover bill.

The final vote is January 24th.  We only have days remaining to save free speech on the internet!

Sincerely,

Gary G. Kreep, Esq.

Executive Director

United States Justice Foundation