Who Is
Running America?
The Bankruptcy of America, the Corporate United States, and
the New World Order
From Archive Source
Who is running America? Have you ever asked that
question?
Under the doctrine of Parens Patriae,
"Government As Parent", as a result of the manipulated bankruptcy
of the United States of America in 1930, ALL the assets of the American
people, their person, and of our country itself are held by the
Depository Trust Corporation at 55 Water Street, NY, NY, secured by UCC
Commercial Liens, which are then monetized as "debt
money" by the Federal Reserve. It may interest you to know that under
the umbrella of the Depository Trust Corporation lies the CEDE Corporation, the
Federal Reserve Corporation, the American Bar Association, the legal arm of the
banking interests, and the Internal Revenue Service, the system's collection
agency.
Now you know who is running America!
You might want to take exception to the name on
the marquee at the entrance to 55 Water Street. “Tower of Power.”
Another thing to think about -- who owns the media and the
news you are fed???
Guess Who??? An Independent Press??? Ha!!!
Guess Who??? An Independent Press??? Ha!!!
The Independent Treasury Act of 1920 suspended the de jure
(meaning "by right of legal establishment") Treasury
Department of the United States government. Our Congress turned the treasury
department over to a private corporation, which when seen in its true
light, is a fascist monopolistic cartel, the Federal Reserve and their
agents. The bulk of the ownership of the Federal Reserve System, a very well
kept secret from the American Citizen, is held by these banking interests, and
NONE is held by the United States Treasury:
Rothschild Bank of London
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Lehman Brothers of New York
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Lehman Brothers of New York
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
The Federal Reserve is at the root of most of our present
statutory regulations, "laws", in the control and regulation of
virtually all aspects of human activity in the United States, through successively
socialistic constructions laid upon the Commerce clause of the Constitution.
Basically, the Federal Reserve is the "STATE" of the United States.
See "Our Enemy, The
STATE" by Albert J. Nock - 1935, his Classic Critique
Distinguishing "Government" from the "STATE."
See Also Charts in Text Format of
Interlocking Directorships and Family Linkages taken from "Federal
Reserve Directors: A Study of Corporate and Banking Influence. Staff
Report, Committee on Banking, Currency and Housing, House of Representatives,
94th Congress, 2nd Session, August 1976."
See Also Secrets of the Federal
Reserve by Eustace Mullins.
Thomas Jefferson once said:
"I believe that banking institutions are more
dangerous to our liberties than standing armies . . . If the American people
ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by
inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up
around [the banks] . . . will deprive the people of all property until their
children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered . . . The
issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to
whom it properly belongs." -- Thomas Jefferson -- The Debate Over
The Recharter Of The Bank Bill, (1809)
Jefferson's
prophesy has come true.
How did this happen? ......Hmmmmm..... Well, that is
going to take a while to explain.
All our law is private law, written by The National Law
Institute, Law Professors, and the Bar Association, the Agents of Foreign
Banking interests. They have come to this position of writing the law by
fraudulently deleting the "Titles
of Nobility and Honour" Thirteenth Amendment from the
Constitution for the United States, creating an oligarchy of Lawyers and
Bankers controlling all three branches of our government. Most of our law comes
directly through the Hague or the U.N. Almost all U.N. treaties have been
codified into the U.S. codes. That's where all our educational programs
originate. The U.N. controls our education system.
The Federal Register Act was created by Pres. Roosevelt in
1935. Title 3 sec. 301 et seq. by Executive Order. He gave himself the power to
create federal agencies and appoint a head of the agency. He then re-delegated
his authority to make law (statutory regulations) to those agency heads. One
big problem there, the president has no constitutional authority to make
law. Under the Constitution re-delegation of delegated authority is a
felony breach.
The president then gave the agencies the authority to tax.
We now have government by appointment running this country. This is the
shadow government sometimes spoken about, but never referred to
as government by appointment. This type of government represents
taxation without representation.
Perhaps this is why some people believe the Constitution was
suspended. It wasn't suspended, it was buried in bureaucratic red tape.
Now, it is an historical fact that with the Declaration of Independence,
to provide a united effort during and after the War for Independence, the
Colonies as independent nations joined together under the Articles of Confederation,
and as Independent Sovereign States drew up constitutions which formed
governments to serve the people of each former colony. The Articles of
Confederation, after a period of 8 years, were determined to have several
flaws. The Congress of delegates called a Convention in 1787 to correct the
flaws. The Convention, instead of modifying the Articles of Confederation as
directed, in secret sessions took it upon themselves to write an entirely new
Constitution, which when ratified by the State Conventions of the Freemen of
the Individual States, created the Federal government to serve them in those
areas where the States operating individually could not effectively serve. In
this new Constitution the people and the States delegated to the Federal
government certain responsibilities, reserving all rights not so enumerated to
the States and to the People in the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution. As a
consequence, the responsibility of the State became one of protecting the
people from the tyranny of federal government, to insure that the federal
government did not reach beyond the bounds of the Constitution. This worked
fairly effectively, until 1933 when Roosevelt assumed office.
The Conference of Chief Justices, Conference of State Court
Administrators, the National Associations of Attorney Generals, Secretaries of
State and State Auditors, State Purchasing Offices, Lieutenant Governors, and
State Legislators, and the Governors of the 50 states comprise the membership
of the Council of State Governments. The Council of State Governments is located
at 676 N. ST. Clair, Chicago, Illinois 60611.
The Council of State Governments has now been absorbed into
the National Conference on Uniform State Laws run by the Bar Association.
The movement for uniform state laws dates back more than a
century. The Alabama State Bar called for uniformity as early as 1881, but it
was nearly a decade later, at the 12th annual meeting of the ABA in 1889, that
the legal community made its formal motion to work for uniformity in the then
44 state union. New York was the first state to move, appointing three
commissioners in 1890. Other states soon heeded the call: Delaware, Georgia,
Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania attended the
first Conference in Saratoga Springs, New York, in 1892. The commissioners
wasted no time. They urged adoption of three acts and proposed raising the
marrying age to 18 for males and 16 for females. They also adopted a table of
weights and measures, noting that with the exception of wheat, legal weights of
a bushel varied in all the states.
By the turn of the century, 33 states and two territories
had appointed commissioners on uniform laws. In 1910, only Nevada and the
Territory of Alaska still had not; they came aboard in 1912.
100 YEARS OF UNIFORM LAWS
An Abridged Chronology
An Abridged Chronology
1890 - New York state legislature passes first
state act authorizing governor to appoint three commissioners. The American Bar
Association (ABA)recommends that other states follow New York's lead.
1891 - Connecticut's Lyman D. Brewster named to
chair newly-created ABA committee on uniform law. Pennsylvania, Michigan,
Massachusetts, New Jersey and Delaware appoint commissioners.
1892 - First conference held in Saratoga Springs
New York. Above states plus Georgia attend formal meeting.
1893 - Committees appointed on such subjects as
wills, marriage and divorce, commercial law, descent and distribution.
1895 - Conference requests committee on
commercial law be formed. Drafts, Negotiable Instrument Law, precursor to
Article 3 of Uniform Commercial Code.
1896 - Negotiable Instrument Law approved by
Conference. First time that a uniform act is adopted in every state and the
District of Columbia.
1897 - For the first time, Commissioners urged
to work toward enactment of uniform legislation in their states.
1898/1899 - Sessions devoted to the
consideration of proposed divorce legislation.
1899 - At the end of the 1890s, 33 of the
existing 45 states and two territories had appointed uniform law commissioners
and eight uniform acts had been drafted, each enacted in at least one state.
All these acts were subsequently superseded or declared obsolete.
1900 - Uniform Divorce Procedure Act adopted.
Louis B. Brandeis begins five years of service as member of Massachusetts
commission.
1901 - Woodrow Wilson begins tenure (until 1908)
as commissioner from New Jersey.
1903 - ABA makes first appropriation in support
of work of Conference. James Barr Ames of Harvard Law School commissioned to
draft the Uniform Partnership Act.
1905 - Samuel W. Pennypacker, Pennsylvania
Governor, invites other governors to send delegation to a national divorce
conference--meets twice in 1906; three acts endorsed.
1906 - First roll call by states as Uniform
Warehouse Receipts Act is approved. Legal scholar Roscoe Pound serves for one
year as a commissioner from Nebraska.
1907 - Uniform Desertion Act and Non-Support Act
and Uniform Marriage Act authorized. Act Regulating Annulment of Marriage of
Divorce adopted. Also, Act Providing for the Return of Marriage Statistics, Act
Providing for the Return of Divorce Statistics.
1908 - Work begins on Uniform Corporation Act.
1910 - Twenty uniform acts approved in decade of
the teens. The Uniform Partnership Act, begun in 1906, was completed by William
Draper Lewis, Dean of the University of Pennsylvania Law School.
1911 - Uniform Marriage and Marriage License Act
and Uniform Child Labor Act approved.
1912 - Uniform Marriage Evasion Act adopted.
Woodrow Wilson, commissioner from New Jersey from 1901 to 1908 elected U.S.
President in a landslide.
1914 - Uniform Partnership Act completed. Will
be adopted by all the states. Also Foreign Acknowledgement Act, Cold Storage
Act, Workmens's Compensation Act.
1915 - Name changed to National Conference of
Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. Constitution and by-laws completely
revised. Each act now must be considered section by section during at least two
annual meetings.
1916 - Uniform Limited Partnership Act as well
as Extradition of Persons of Unsound Minds Act approved, also Land Registration
Act.
1917 - Uniform Flag Act approved.
1918 - Uniform Fraudulent Conveyance Act
approved.
1920 - Certain Acts withdrawn; others declared
obsolete. After pruning, 26 acts remain as recommended for passage in state
legislatures.
1930 - During the 30s, Conference adopts 31
acts.
1935 - Conference entered into agreement with
American Law Institute for cooperative drafting of acts in area of common
interest.
1936 - After revisions, withdrawals and acts declared
obsolete, 53 uniform acts remained as recommended for approval.
On April 25, 1938, the Supreme Court overturned the standing
precedents of the prior 150 years concerning "COMMON
LAW" in the federal government.
"THERE IS NO FEDERAL COMMON LAW, AND CONGRESS HAS NO
POWER TO DECLARE SUBSTANTIVE RULES OF COMMON LAWapplicable IN A
STATE, WHETHER they be LOCAL or GENERAL in
their nature, be they COMMERCIAL LAW or a part of LAW OF
TORTS." (See:ERIE RAILROAD CO. vs. THOMPKINS, 304 U.S. 64, 82
L. Ed. 1188)
The Common Law is the fountain source of Substantive and
Remedial Rights, if not our very Liberties. The members and associates
of the Bar thereafter formed committees,granted themselves special
privileges, immunities and franchises, and held meetings concerning
the Judicial procedures, and further, to amend laws "to conform
to a trend of judicial decisions or to accomplish similar objectives",
including hodgepodging the jurisdictions of Law and Equity together, which is
known today as "One Form of Action."[See: Constitution
and By Laws, Article 3, Section 3.3(c), 1990-91 Reference Book, see
also Colorado Methods of Practice, West Publishing, Vol. 4, pages
2-3, Authors Comments.]
1939 - ABA gets more involved in approval of
uniform law products. Thirty-nine acts are presented to the Board of Governors
of the ABA for consideration and approval. During the same year, all acts on
aeronautics and motor vehicles are eliminated as well as the Land Registration
Act, Child Labor Act of 1930, Uniform Divorce Jurisdiction Act, Firearms Act,
Marriage Act and more. Six acts are reclassified as Model acts.
1940 - At start of decade, after deletions,
etc., 53 acts out of 93 which had been approved since the group's founding
remain on the books. Drafting committee for the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC)
approved.
1941 - Speaking of the Commercial Code project,
the Conference president states: "....this is the most important and
the most far reaching project on which the conference has ever
embarked." It would take the major part of the next 10 tear period to
complete.
1942 - UCC effort begins in earnest with
completion of work on the revised Uniform Sales Act.
1943 - Members of the conference participate in
drafting committee in Washington, D.C. to work on legislation which the government
might desire in connection with the war effort. No new acts.
1944 - Conference receives $150,000 grant from
the Falk Foundation of Pittsburgh to support work on the UCC.
1945 - No annual meeting for the first time due
to difficulties of civilian transport during the war.
1946 - Falk Foundation increases its support of
the UCC with an additional $100,000.
1947 - Uniform Law Conference (ULC) and American
Law Institute join in partnership to put all the components together for the
UCC. Uniform Divorce Recognition Act approved.
1950 - Approval of the Uniform Marriage License
Application Act, Uniform Adoption Act and the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of
Support Act (URESA). The latter has been one of the most successful ULC
products.
1951 - On May 18, during a joint meeting with
the American Law Institute in Washington, D.C., the UCC was approved. Later
that year the ABA formally approved the code as well. Considered the
outstanding accomplishment of the Conference, the Code remains the ULC's
signature product.
One of the Uniform Laws drafted by the National Conference
of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and the American Law Institute governing
commercial transactions (including sales and leasing of goods, transfer of
funds, commercial paper, bank deposits and collections, letters of credit, bulk
transfers, warehouse receipts, bills of lading, investment securities, and
secured transactions), The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), has been adopted in
whole or substantially by all states. (See: Blacks Law, 6th Ed. pg.
1531)In essence, all court decisions are based on commercial law or business
law and has criminal penalties associated with it. Rather than openly
calling this new lawAdmiralty/Maritime
Jurisdiction, it is called Statutory Jurisdiction.
America as a bankrupt nation is owned completely by its
creditors.
The creditors own the Congress, they own the Executive,
they own the Judiciary and they own all the State governments. Do you have a Birth
Certificate? They own you too.
1952 - Uniform Rules of Criminal Procedure
approved---first venture of the Conference into this area of the law.
1953 - Pennsylvania the first state to enact the
UCC. Uniform Rules of Evidence adopted.
1954 - Disposition of Unclaimed Property Act
approved.
1956 - Gift to Minors Act approved. Will be
adopted in every state. For the first time, ULC enters the field of
international law.
1957 - Massachusetts becomes second state to
enact the UCC, after revisions by the Editorial Board.
1958 - Uniform Securities Act approved.
1960 - Uniform Paternity Act passed. by 1960,
UCC enacted in Kentucky, Connecticut, New Hampshire and Rhode Island.
1961 - Permanent Editorial Board on the UCC
formed---8 more states pass UCC. Constitution amended to provide that all
members of Conference must be members of the bar.
1962 - Four more states adopt UCC, including New
York. Probate Code project approved.
1963 - Third comprehensive law project approved,
on retail installment sales, consumer credit, small loans and usury. Eleven
more UCC states. William H. Renquist begins term as commissioner from Arizona;
serves until 1968.
1964 - Special Committee of Uniform Divorce and
Marriage laws recommends that a study of divorce law be authorized and that
funds be sought. One more UCC state.
1965 - Divorce and Marriage Law committee
instructed to commence drafting if funds can be obtained for the project.
Thirteen more UCC states.
1966 - Five more UCC states.
1968 - Much of annual meeting devoted to the
Uniform Consumer Credit Code and the Uniform Probate Code ---two projects
nearing completion. By 1968, 49 states, the District of Columbia and U.S.
Virgin Islands have enacted the UCC---only exception being Louisiana. A big
year. Other developments in 1968: the Consumer Credit Code is approved as well
as revisions to the Anatomical Gift Act, Child Custody Jurisdiction Act and
revisions to URESA.
1969 - Probate Code approved. Preliminary
analysis of the uniform marriage and divorce legislation distributed.
1970 - Controlled Substances Act and Uniform
Marriage and Divorce Act approved.
1971 - Uniform Alcoholism and Intoxication Act
approved.
1972 - Uniform Residential Landlord and Tenant
Act, Disposition of Community Property Rights At Death Act and UMVARA, the
Uniform Motor Vehicle Accident Reparations Act approved.
1973 - Uniform Parentage Act supersedes
Paternity Act. Uniform Crime Victims Reparations Act approved.
1974 - Conference approves Rules of Criminal
Procedure and Eminent Domain Code. Louisiana, the only state not to adopt the
Uniform Commercial Code due to difficulties in reconciling its provisions with
those of the Civil Code, adopts Articles 1,3,4,5,7, and 8.
1975 - Uniform Land Transactions Act approved.
1976 - Major revision of the Uniform Partnership
Act approved; also Uniform Simplification of Land Transfers and Uniform Class
Action Acts.
1978 - Uniform Brain Death and Uniform Federal
Lien Registration Act approved.
1979 - Uniform Trade Secrets and Durable Power
of Attorney acts among those approved.
1980 - Determination of Death Act supersedes
1978 Brain Death Act. Uniform Planned Community Act, Model Real Estate
Time-Share Act and Model Periodic Payment of Judgments Act also adopted.
1981 - Two important updated acts approved: new
Model State Administration Procedure and Unclaimed Property Acts. Also two new
acts: the Model Real Estate Cooperative Act and the Uniform Conservation
Easement Act.
1982 - Uniform Condominium and Planned Community
Acts and Model Real Estate Cooperative Act combined into the Uniform Common
Interest Ownership act.
The enumerated, specified, and distinct Jurisdictions
established by the ordained Constitution (1789), Article III, Section 2, and
under the Bill of Rights (1791), Amendment VII, were further hodgepodged and
fundamentally changed in 1982 to include Admiralty Jurisdiction,
which was once again brought inland. This was the FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE necessary
to effect unification of CIVIL and ADMIRALTY PROCEDURE. Just
as 1938 Rules ABOLISHED THE DISTINCTION between Actions At Law and Suits in
Equity, this CHANGE WOULD ABOLISH THE DISTINCTION between CIVIL ACTIONS and
SUITS IN ADMIRALTY." (See: Federal Rules of Procedure, 1982
Ed., pg. 17. Also seeFederalist Papers, No. 83, Declaration Of
Resolves Of The First Continental Congress, Oct. 14th, 1774, Declaration
Of Cause And Necessity Of Taking Up Arms, July 16, 1775,Declaration Of
Independence, July 4, 1776, Bennet vs. Butterworth, 52 U.S.
669)
1983 - Uniform Marital Property Act and Uniform
Premarital agreement Act approved. Uniform Transfers to Minors Act replaces the
uniformly enacted Uniform Gifts to Minors Act.
1984 - Uniform Statutory Will Act approved; new
Uniform fraudulent Transfer Act supersedes Fraudulent Conveyance Act of 1918.
1985 - Uniform Health-Care Information Act,
Uniform Land Security Interest act, Uniform Personal Property Leasing Act and
Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act approved.
1986 - New drafting effort to revise Articles 3
and 4 of the UCC and draft new provisions begins.
1987 - Approval of the revised Uniform
Anatomical Gift Act approved as well as new Uniform Custodial Trust Act,
Uniform Construction Lien Act and Uniform Franchise and Business Opportunities
Act. Also revision of Rules of Criminal Procedure.
1988 - Final approval of amendments to the
Uniform Securities Act and amendments to Article 6 of the UCC dealing with bulk
sales. Conference also approves Uniform Statutory Form Power of Attorney Act
and Uniform Punitive and Unknown Fathers Act and takes on the controversial
issue of surrogate mother contracts with Uniform Status of Children of Assisted
Conception Act.
1989 - Article 4A of the UCC, dealing with
electronic funds transfers, approved. Also approved: amendments to the Rights
of the Terminally Ill Act, authorizing withdrawal of life support by a
surrogate decision maker; the Uniform Pretrial Detention Act, confining violent
criminals before trial; the Uniform Non-probate Transfers on Death Act and
amendments to Article VI of the Uniform Probate Code.
1990 - Major revision of 1970 Uniform Controlled
Substances Act-- the law in 46 jurisdictions-- approved. Substantial revision
of UCC Article 3 also approved, as well as an updated Article II of the Uniform
Probate Code, to keep pace with current thinking on marital property.
This private corruption of the law has occurred despite the
Constitutional responsibility conferred on Congress by Article I, Section 8 of
the Federal Constitution which states that it is Congress that "makes
all Laws."
What does that have to do with anything? Uniform Laws
seem to be a good Idea.
Well now, that is a good question. Let us continue.....
An Expose On The Legal Fraud Perpetrated On All Americans
THE COURTS RECOGNIZE ONLY TWO CLASSES OF PEOPLE IN THE
UNITED STATES TODAY: DEBTORS AND CREDITORS
The concept of DEBTORS and CREDITORS is very important to
understand.
Every legal action where you are brought before the court:
e.g. traffic ticket, property dispute or permits, income tax, credit cards,
bank loans or anything else government might dream up to charge you where you
find yourself in front of a court. It is an equity court, administrating
commercial law having a debtor-creditor law as the controlling law. Today, we
have an equity court but not an equity court as defined by the Constitution of
the United States or any other legal documents before 1938.
All the courts of this once great land have been changed
starting with the Supreme Court decision of 1938 in ERIE V. THOMPKINS. I'll
give you background which led to this decision. There is a terrible
FRAUD being perpetrated on all Americans. Please understand that this fraud is
a 24 hour, 7 days a week, year after year continuous fraud. This fraud is
constantly upon you all your life. It doesn't just happen once in a while. This
fraud is perpetually and incessantly upon you and your family.
U.S. INC. GOES TO GENEVA 1930's
In order for you to understand just how this fraud works,
you need to know the history of its inception.
It goes like this: From 1928 -1932 there were five years of
Geneva conventions. The nations of the world met in Geneva Switzerland for 5
continuous years in order to set up what would be the policy of all the
participating countries. During the year of 1930 the U.S., Great Britain,
France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Portugal etc. all declared bankruptcy. If you
try to look up the 1930 minutes, you will not find them because they don't
publish this particular volume. If you try to find the 1930 volume which
contains the minutes of what happened, you will probably not find it. This
volume has been pulled out of circulation or is hidden in the library and is
very hard to find. This volume contains the evidence of the bankruptcy.
Going into 1932, they stopped meeting in Geneva. In 1932
Franklin Roosevelt came into power as President of the United States.
Roosevelt's job was to put into place and administer the bankruptcy that had
been declared two years earlier. The corporate government needed a key Supreme
Court decision. The corporate United States government had to have a legal case
on the books to set the stage for recognizing, implementing and supporting the
bankruptcy. Now. this doesn't mean the bankruptcy wasn't implemented before
1938 with the Erie vs. Thompkins decision. The bankruptcy started in 1930-1931.
The bankruptcy definitely started when Roosevelt came into office. He was sworn
in during the month of January 1933. He started right away in the bankruptcy
with what is known as 'The Banking Holiday," and proceeded in pulling the
gold coin out of circulation. That was the beginning of the corporate United
States Public Policy for bankruptcy.. Executive Orders 6073, 6102, 6111 &
Executive Order 6260 "Trading With The Enemy Act."
ROOSEVELT STACKS SUPREME COURT
It is a known historical fact that during 1933 and 1937 -
1938, there was a big fight between Roosevelt and the Supreme Court Justices.
Roosevelt tried to stack the Supreme court with a bunch of his pals. Roosevelt
tried to enlarge the number of justices and he tried to change the slant of the
justices. The corporate United States had to have one Supreme Court case which
would support their bankruptcy problem.
There was resistance to Roosevelt's court stacking efforts.
Some of the justices tried to warn us that Roosevelt was tampering with the law
and with the courts. Roosevelt was trying to see to it that prior decisions of
the court were overturned. He was trying to bring in a new order, a new
procedure for the law of the land. See also The UCC
Connection
THE CORPORATE UNITED STATES GOES BANKRUPT
A bankruptcy case was needed on the books to legitimize the
fact that the corporate U.S. had already declared bankruptcy! This bankruptcy
was effectuated by compact that the corporate several states had with the
corporate government (Corporate Capitol of the several corporate states). This
compact tied the corporate several states to corporate Washington D.C, (the
headquarters of the corporation called "The United States").
Since the United States Corporation, having established its
headquarters within the District of Columbia, declared itself to be in the
state of bankruptcy, it automatically declared bankruptcy for all its
subsidiaries who were effectively connected corporate members (who happened to
be the corporate state governments of the Union). The corporate state governments
didn't have to vote on the bankruptcy. The bankruptcy automatically became
effective by reason of the Compact/Agreement between each of the corporate
state governments and THE MOTHER CORPORATION. (Note: the liberty of
using the term "Mother Corporation" to communicate the
interconnected power of the corporate Federal government relative to her
associated corporate States has been taken.
It is Historical knowledge that the original Union States
created the Federal Government, however, for all practical purposes, the
Federal government has taken control of her"Creators", the
States.) She has become a beast out of control for power. She has for her trade
names the following: "United
States", "U.S.", "U.S.A.", "United
States of America",Washington D.C., District of Columbia, Feds. and
Federal Government. She has her own U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, Parks,
Post Office etc. etc. etc. Because she is claiming to be bankrupt, she freely
gives her land, her personnel, and the money she steals from the Americans via
the IRS. and her state corporations, to the United Nations and the
International Bankers as payment for her debt. The UN and the International
Bankers use this money and services for various world wide projects, including
war.
War is an extremely lucrative business for the bankers of
the New World Order. Loans for destruction. Loans for re-construction. Loans
for controlling people in her new world order.
THE U.S. INC. DECLARES BANKRUPTCY
The corporate U.S. then, is the head corporate member, who
met at Geneva to decide for all its corporate body members. The corporate
representatives of the corporate several states were in attendance. If the
states had their own power to declare bankruptcy regardless of whether
Washington D.C. declared bankruptcy or not, then the several states would have
been represented at Geneva. The several states of America were not represented.
Consequently, whatever Washington D.C. agreed to at Geneva was passed on
automatically, via compact to the several corporate states as a group,
association, corporation or as a club member; they all agreed and declared
bankruptcy as one government corporate group in 1930. The several states only
needed a representative at Geneva by way of the U.S. in Washington D.C. The
delegates of the corporate United States attended the meetings and spoke for
the several corporate states as well as for the Federal Corporate Government.
And, presto, BANKRUPTCY was declared for all!
From 1930 to 1938 the states could not enact any law or
decide any case that would go against the Federal Government. The case had to
come down from the Federal level so that the states could then rely on the
Federal decision and use this decision within the states as justification for
the bankruptcy process within the states.
UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE EMERGES AS LAW OF THE LAND
Ah, Ha, are you beginning to get the picture?
Ah, Ha, are you beginning to get the picture?
By 1938 the corporate Federal Government had the true
bankruptcy case they had been looking for. Now, the bankruptcy that had been
declared back in 1930 could be upheld and administered. That's why the Supreme
Court had to be stacked and made corrupt from within. The new players on the
Supreme Court fully understood that they had to destroy all other case law that
had been established prior to 1938. The Federal Government had to have a case
to destroy all precedent, all appearance, and even the statute of law itself.
That is, the Statutes at large had to be perverted. They finally got their case
in Erie vs. Thompkins. It was right after that case that the American Law
Institute and the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws
listed right in the front of the Uniform Commercial Code, began creating the
Uniform Commercial Code that is on our backs today. Let us quote directly from
the preface of the Official Text of the Uniform Commercial Code 12th Edition:
"The Code was originally approved by its sponsors and
the American Bar Association in 1952, and was revised in 1958 to incorporate a
number of changes that had been recommended by the New York Law Revision
Commission and other agencies. Subsequent amendments that were deemed desirable
in light of experience under the Code were approved by the Permanent Editorial
Board in 1962 and 1966"
The above named groups and associations of private lawyers
got together and started working on the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). It was
somewhere between 1938 and 1940, I don't recall, but by the early 40's and
during the war, this committee was working to form the UCC and getting it ready
to go on the market. The UCC is the Law Merchant's code for the administration
of the bankruptcy. The UCC is now the law of the land as far as the courts are
concerned. This Legal Committee of lawyers put everything: Negotiable
Instruments, Security, Sales, Contracts, and the whole mess under the UCC.
That's where the "Uniform" word comes from. It means it was
uniform from state to state as well as being uniform with the District of
Columbia.
It doesn't mean you didn't have the uniform instrument laws
on the books before this time. It means the laws were not uniform from state to
state. By the middle 1960's, every state had passed the UCC into law. The
states had no choice but to adopt newly formed Uniform Commercial Code as the
Law of the Land. The states fully understood they had to administrate
Bankruptcy. Washington D.C. adopted the Uniform Commercial Code in
1963, just six weeks after President John F. Kennedy was killed.
YOUR LAWYER'S SECRET OATH???
What was the effect and the significance of Erie vs.
Thompkins case decision of 1938? The significance is that since the Erie
Decision, no cases are allowed to be cited that are prior to 1938. There can be
no mixing of the old law with the new law. The lawyers, who are members of the
American Bar Association, were and are currently under and controlled by the
Lawyer's guild of Great Britain, created, formed, and implemented the new
bankruptcy law. The American Bar Association is a franchise of the Lawyer's
Guild of Great Britain.
Since the Erie vs. Thompkins case was decided, the practice
of law in this country was never again to be the same. It has been reported,
that every lawyer in existence, and every lawyer coming up has to take
a "secret" oath to support bankruptcy. As Officers of the
Court they have sworn to uphold the law as it exists, and as they have been
taught. In so doing, not only do the lawyers promise to support the bankruptcy,
but the lawyers and judges promise never to reveal who the true creditor/party
is in the bankruptcy proceedings (if, indeed, many of them are even aware or
know). In court, there is never identification and appearance of the true
character and principle of the proceedings. If there is no appearance of the
true party to the action, then there is no way the defendant is able to know
the TRUE NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE ACTION. You are never told the
true NATURE AND CAUSE OF WHY YOU ARE IN FRONT OF THEIR COURT. The
court is forbidden to tell you that information.
That's why, if you question the true nature and cause, the
judge will tell you "It's not my job to tell you. You are not
retaining me as an attorney and I can't give you legal advice from the bench. I
suggest you hire a lawyer."
HIRE A LAWYER?
The problem here is, if you hire a lawyer who is pledged not
to reveal the true nature and the cause, how will you ever find out the nature
and the cause? YOU WON'T! If the true nature and the cause of the action
against you is revealed, it will expose the real creditor from whom this action
and cause came. In other words, they will have to name the TRUE creditor. The
true creditor will have to state the nature and the cause. The true creditor
will have to say "It's a bankruptcy proceeding." The true
creditor will have to say, "I'm the creditor and he's the
debtor."
That declaration would open the door for you to
question "Who the hell are you? How did you get attached to my back
and by what vehicle did I promise to become a debtor to you?"In this
country, the courts on every level, from the justice of the peace level all the
way up...... even into the International law arena, (called the World Court),
are administrating the bankruptcy and are pledged not to reveal who the true
creditors really are and how you personally became pledged as a party or
participant to the corporate United States debt. What would really kill these
people off, would be to compel the International Bankers to send a lawyer into
the courtroom and present himself as the attorney for THE TRUE CREDITOR, THE
INTERNATIONAL BANKERS. THEN, HAVE THE ATTORNEY PUT INTO THE RECORD THE TRUE
NATURE AND CAUSE OF THE PROCEEDING AGAINST YOU ON THAT PARTICULAR DAY.
The International Bankers told these various countries that
they were now in a state of bankruptcy. The countries had been taken over by
the creditor/bankers. And there was no choice, but for all these participating
countries to declare bankruptcy. If they didn't agree to declare bankruptcy,
the bankers threatened to collapse the economies and thereby put the countries
back into the depression like the one from which they were just emerging. The
bankers made an offer they couldn't refuse. To review and elaborate: In 1930
there was a world wide depression.
The Bankers said, "Look. You can do it either of
two ways. The easy way or the hard way." "You just accept the
bankruptcy and we'll let you out of the depression. If you don't, you're on
your own." So all the countries involved agreed, because they
realized that the International bankers had them by the throat. The countries
therefore agreed that over a period of several years that they would pass
statutes and legislation for the implementation of the bankruptcy in favor of
the international bankers.
Now, it would probably be correct to say that the key
bankers were the Rothschild's and their agents by way of Rockefeller, by way of
the Federal Reserve Bank. Who the bankers were is immaterial. The fact remains
that there was an International bankruptcy, and an International conspiracy to
cover it up. There was a banking creditor who made the offer; the countries
accepted the offer in order to enable the representative countries to continue
without revolution and to allow the politicians to remain comfortably in place.
Under a delusion of solvency the countries were allowed to continue to operate
as though they were solvent; while in fact, the representative countries were
bankrupt.
THE SNARE
The bankruptcy scheme was/is an extremely clever and
diabolical plan. How did they possibly pull this scheme off in the area of real
estate? The bankers did it with real estate, the same way they did it in the
area of Federal Income Taxes. These Foreign bankers simply and deceptively
devised ways and means to con you into declaring yourself as
a "CITIZEN"or a "RESIDENT" of the corporate
U.S. Remember the corporate United States is Bankrupt per agreement and public
policy. After you have been tricked into claiming you are one of their
corporate United States Citizens, you are given a social security number which
ties you to certain meager "benefits" and "privileges."Then,
the bankers con your employer to function as an unpaid tax collector to con you
into filling out their W-4 intangible property gift forms and 1040 voluntary
agreements.
These slick paper agreements establish
your "voluntary" indebtedness to the banker creditor. If at
any time you decide to balk at this scheme because you don't like it, the real
creditor never has to make an appearance in court to list the true nature and
cause of the action which is being brought against you. You end up dealing with
an agency. The agency can conveniently grant itself immunity from prosecution
because all it is doing (without your knowledge, of course) is administrating
the bankruptcy to which the government agreed to per the Geneva meetings.
The court system never lets you put the original creditor on
the courtroom stand, so you can ask him how he got attached to your back. The
system is set up in such a way that the true creditor is protected and never
has to make an appearance and never has to answer any of your questions or
produce documents. Therefore, the true creditor never has to produce the law
that gives him the right to pledge you (your body and labor) into indebtedness
(bondage/servitude).
Why? Because the Geneva agreement in 1930 was done by
treaty. The bankruptcy was not done by legislation. The agreement came first;
signed in secrecy, THEN Congress began to pass legislation to fulfill the
bankruptcy obligation required by the treaty. Legislation being passed by
Congress was henceforth and is thereby bankruptcy legislation. When cases came
before the courts, the courts could make decisions based on the new controlling
law of bankruptcy. It had nothing to do with Constitutional rights. Now, any
case brought in is under the new bankruptcy law and is not considered as a true
constitutional case. It is now a bankrupty case as distinct from, but cleverly
disguised as a constitutional case.
THE FRAUD
The members of the Supreme Court, of course, realized what
was happening to them and the system of law. The court was being asked to
perform in a creditor, debtor bankrupt proceeding to the benefit of the banker
creditors. The members of the Supreme Court said, "NO. We will not
give you a bankrupt proceeding decision that you can then enforce against
everybody; a decision not only effecting corporate Washington D.C. but also
having effect within the corporate state governments."
This, by the way, is fraud. It wouldn't be fraud if the
government of corporate Washington D.C. and the government of the several
corporate states declared bankruptcy then let the people know about the
bankruptcy. (Notice: when I say corporate "government" I
don't mean you and me. You and I are not the corporate government. The
corporate government is the corporate capital of the corporate state. The
government is a neutral government zone known as the corporate capital of the
corporate state. The government is where the corporate state is. It is
corporate headquarters. Just like corporate Washington D.C. is the seat of the
corporate Federal Government. The capital of the corporate state is the seat of
the corporate state government. If the corporate Federal Government and her
subsidiary corporate state governments want to join forces and declare
bankruptcy that's not fraud. This is their corporate business.
However, it is fraud when those two corporate entities
declare bankruptcy but do not disclose to you, me, and every other American,
that they have so declared bankruptcy.
Further they have not and do not disclose that their
intention is to get you and every other American in this country to pledge to
pay off their corporate debt to their corporate creditors. The corporate
bankruptcy is the corporate state and federal responsibility, not the
responsibility of Americans, The People.
U.S. INC. IS DISTINCT AND SEPARATE FROM PRIVATE AMERICANS
"We the People" who created and signed the
contract/compact/agreement/charter of, by, and for the Constitutional
Corporation (U.S.) using the trade name of the "United States of
America," is a corporate entity (legal fiction) which is DISTINCT AND
SEPARATE from Americans or the unenfranchised people of America. The private
natural American people did not create the corporation of the United States.
The United States Inc. did not create the private natural American people.
America and Americans were in existence prior to the creation of the United
States Corporation. The United States Corporation has located its U.S.
headquarters in Washington D.C.
Virginia State (state territory) gave land to the newly
formed United States Corporation. Notice here, we have a state giving something
of value (land) to the United States. The United Stales Corporation agreed in
the Constitutional contract, to protect the States. Instead, because of their
bankruptcy (Corporate U.S. Bankruptcy) this particular U.S. corporation has
enslaved the States and the people by deception and at the will of their
foreign bankers with whom they have been doing business. Our forefathers gave
their lives and property to prevent enslavement.
Today, we are again enslaved. Private natural American
people have been tricked, deceived, and set-up to carry the U.S. Inc. perpetual
corporate debt under bankruptcy laws. Every time Americans appear in court, the
corporate U.S. bankruptcy is being administrated against them without their
knowledge and lawful consent. That is FRAUD.
All corporate bankruptcy administration is done
by "Public Policy" of by and for the Mother Corporation
(U.S. Inc.).
THE MOTHER CORPORATION'S "PUBLIC POLICY"
The corporate bankruptcy is carried out under the corporate
public policy of the corporate Federal Government in corporate Washington D.C.
The states use state public policy to carry out Federal public policy of
Washington D.C. Public policy and only public policy is being administered
against you in the corporate courts today. The public policy that is dictated
by all the courts, from the smallest to the most powerful courts in the world,
is public policy. This is why I said, in another tape that the Russian people
would be enslaved into indebtedness. What will happen is that it will become
public policy in Russia to have the people go into joint corporate debt. The
Russians will be forced to promise to pay those debts. They will be forced to
pay off on those corporate debts. Corporate public policy is the crux of the
whole bankruptcy implementation. Corporate public policy is forever a Corporate
public policy and the laws that have passed since 1938 are all corporate public
policy laws dealing only with corporate public policy. Understand that U.S.
corporate public policy is not an American public policy. The public policy is
OF, ( belonging to) the United States corporation. This U.S. corporate
bankruptcy public policy is not OF (belonging to) America, the Republic.
The Erie vs. Thompkins 1938 case was a decision based upon
public policy. All decisions at any level since 1938, have been public policy
decisions. All statutes, rules, regulations, and procedures that have been
passed, whether civil or criminal, whether it is Federal or State, have all
been passed to implement the public policy of bankruptcy. Since 1933, when FDR
came into office, he brought in public policy. He established that it was the
public policy of the overnment to call in all the gold. It was the public
policy of the government to declare a banking holiday. It was the public policy
of the Government in Washington D.C., (the Federal Government) to give out
government assistance. Public policy operates the same within the states. All
Federal court decisions can only be handed down if the states support Federal
public policy. The state legal system must be compatible with the Federal legal
system.
THE MONKEY-WRENCH
This is why, when people like us go to court without being
represented by a lawyer, we throw a monkey-wrench into their corporate
administrative proceedings. Why? Because all public policy corporate lawyers
are pledged to up-hold public policy, which is the corporate U.S.
administration of their corporate bankruptcy. That's why you'll find stamped on
many if not all our briefs, "THIS CASE IS NOT TO BE CITED IN ANY
OTHER CASE AND IS NOT TO BE REPORTED IN ANY COURTS." The reason for
this notation is that when we go in to defend ourselves or file a claim we are
not supporting the corporate bankruptcy administration and procedure. The
arguments we put forth predate 1938.
We come in with Constitutional law etc. All these early
cases support our rights not to be in bankruptcy. However, the corporate court,
lawyers, and judges have promised to give no judicial recognition of any case
before 1938.
THE INTERNATIONAL BANKERS'
CORPORATE PLANTATION
U.S.A. STYLE
CORPORATE PLANTATION
U.S.A. STYLE
Before 1938, the law was not a public policy law. All these
old cases were not public law deciding cases. Today, the cases are all decided under
corporate public policy. The public policy exists in order to administer the
bankruptcy for the benefit of the banker creditors and to protect the banker
creditor.
Corporate public policy can allow the creditor to say to the
corporate legislatures, "I want a law passed requiring my debtors to
wear seat belts. Why? Because I want to be able to milk my debtors for the
longest period possible."
It doesn't behoove the creditor to allow all of his labor
producing debtors die at an average age 30 years. What would happen to the
bankers' lending, interest, penalties, increase, repayment etc., on the entire
funding and lending process if the average American life span was only 30
years? Why, the bankers would have to have 2 1/2 times the current consumer population
to equal their current take. The bankers would need (instead of 250 million
Americans) 600 million or even more. Maybe the bankers would need 2 Billion
Americans because the individual can't contract for debt until he/she is 18 or
21 years of age. Therefore, if the average life span is only a 30 year period,
the creditor could collect on the debt for only 12 years.
Now, if the bankers can just get people to live an average
of 70 years) you are talking a whopping 50 years of indebtedness for which they
contract and for which they are forced to pay back with usury/interest. With
this situation, the banker creditor can now float loans worth 50 years of
potential indebtedness and its payoff with interest in the name of the people,
as opposed to 9 to 12 years.
The creditors and their property and their people are well
taken care of. The creditor doesn't want the population to decrease per se,
unless, it is convenient for the debtor to run up debts in another's name and
then liquidate that debtor or that group of debtor people. For example let's
consider the AIDS problem today among the black people. What better group to
inject AIDS into than the black people?
Read the Strecker Memorandum on AIDS and the World Health
Organization connection. This documents their tainted vaccination program in
Africa and elsewhere. Why not kill them off? Don't you understand that the
blacks as a whole have absorbed all the debt that they can? The blacks have
reached the maximum of the debt that they can carry. In fact, they have gone
over their limit to pay back. They are now heavily into welfare, public
housing, medicaid, medicare, food stamps etc.. Now, the situation is that
instead of paying off the creditor, they have become a drain on the creditor.
The creditor must now pay them to live and take care of them. What creditor in
his right mind wants to spend money on a bunch of people from whom he can't
collect any revenue?
The corporate public policy of the corporate United States
and the states and the county and of the cities are that YOU must take care of
these people. You must provide them with welfare etc. Why? Because when you, as
a member of the corporate body politic allow laws to be passed which says the
minorities must be taken care of, then the corporate legislature can say the
public policy is that the people want these people taken care of. Therefore,
when given the chance, the legislature can say the public policy is that the
people want these blacks and poor whites to be taken care of and given a
chance, therefore, we must raise taxes to fund all these benefits, privileges
and opportunities.
This is what these people need to make them socially,
politically, and economically equal with everyone else. The legislatures have
passed all kinds of statutes providing for huge indebtedness and they float the
indebtedness off your backs because you have never gone into court to challenge
them by telling them it is not your public policy to assume the debts of other
people. On the contrary, all the court decisions coming put, indicate it is the
corporate public policy and it is your willingness to support the corporate
public policy to pay off these debts.
Remember, "public" means of and for the
corporate Government. It does not mean of and for private
people. "Public" means corporate government. It is
corporate government policy. When they talk about public debt, they
are talking about corporate government debt and your presumed pledge
against this corporate created debt.
THE REAL ESTATE SNARE
How do they work this scheme in the area of real estate?
These banker creeps have made an agreement that it is corporate public policy,
that all land (property) be pledged to the creditor to satisfy the debt of the
bankruptcy, which the creditor claims under bankruptcy. They get away with this
the same way they get away with any other case that is brought before the
court, whether it is a traffic ticket, IRS, or whatever.
Here is how it works. You have signed instruments giving
information and jurisdiction to the bankers through their agents. The
instruments (forms) you signed include, but are not limited to the following:
social security registration, use of the social security number, IRS forms,
driver license, traffic citation, jury duty, voter registration, using their
address, zip code, U.S. postal service, a deed, a mortgage application, etc.
etc. The bankers then use that instrument (document) under the Uniform
Commercial Code (UCC) as a contract/agreement. These documents are considered
promissory contract where you promise to perform. This scheme involves you,
without you ever becoming directly in contact or in contract with the true
creditor. What's more, you are never informed as to whom that true creditor is
and it is never divulged to you the true nature and the true cause of the paperwork
that you are filling out.
If you will examine your real estate deed, you will find
that you promised to pay taxes to the corporate government. On property you
originally acquired through a mortgage, you will notice that the bank never
promised to pay taxes. You did. The corporate government at all levels never
promised to pay taxes to the creditor. You did.
In tax and collection problems relating to real estate being
enforced against you, you will notice that there is no mention in the mortgage
or the deed stating the true nature and cause of the action. Since you have
made the promise to perform, you get a bill every year for property taxes. You
don't realize that the only way they can bill you for taxes is through your own
stupidity of agreeing to pay the tax. You volunteered. They took advantage of
you, conning you to promise to pay properly taxes. When they send you their
bill, they are coming against you for the collection of the promise you made to
the creditor.
Now the creditor on the paperwork appears that it is the
local bank. The bank has loaned you credit. The bank hasn't loaned you
anything. It is not their credit to loan. This is why the bank can't loan
credit. There is a credit involved, but not the bank's credit. It is the credit
of the International Bankers. The International bankers are making you the loan
based upon their operation of bankruptcy claim which they presume to have
against you personally as well as your property. Now, let's say you get a tax
bill and you decide "I'm not going to pay it." You will
find that the courts and the lawyers and the county agencies are set up to
protect the true creditor simply by not identifying the creditor. By not being
identified as the true creditor, the international banker can make you a credit
loan that has no value in reality.
In the case of real property, he claims to loan you the use
of your own property for which you pay a tax as rent. He is allowed to do this
because you are presumed by statutory law and the banker to be in bankruptcy. This
fraud is not revealed because he does not have to make an appearance in court
to present and defend his claim. His name is not mentioned in the case.
Let's say you are not aware of your remedies provided for
you within the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC provides or allows you to
dishonor the county's presentment of the tax bill. You don't pay your tax bill.
You, therefore, just sit on it and don't do or say anything. A couple of years
go by and all of a sudden you are being sent letters to pay up what is owed or
else in a certain period of time, your property will be taken from you and put
up for tax sale.
Now here is what is interesting........ If you don't pay
your tax bill and they contact you asking you to pay it and you don't do it,
they will declare that you are in default. It is based on that default, as
provided for in the UCC, that they sell your property for the tax (rent).
However, the county never goes into court to put into the
record the identification of the real creditor. And the county does not state
the true nature and cause of the action against you (bankruptcy action
disguised as a tax action). Why? Because, under bankruptcy implementation, they
have developed a legal procedure which is based upon your promise to pay. This
procedure provides that they don't have to come to the court to get a court
order authorizing the sale of your property. Therefore, the real creditor never
makes an appearance in court.
The reality is, you are denied any possibility of appearing
in court to exercise your right to challenge the creditor. To ask if he became
the creditor under "public policy." To ask if it is
under "public policy", just what is the "public
policy?" And how did you (as an international banker)
become "creditor" to me and everyone else in this country
(American people). They don't want you to ask the real creditor (the
International Bankers), to produce the documents upon which your personal debt
is established. If they were forced to go into court, they would have to
produce the deed or mortgage showing you knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily
promised to pay the corporate public debt. You did not knowingly, willingly,
and voluntarily promise to pay any U.S. Corporate Bankruptcy obligation made in
the 1930's.
This would, of course, expose their racket. The fact is,
that, there was absolutely no debt connected to you until you agreed to it
through their deception and fraud. The deception in a broader sense, permeates
the education system and the news media, etc., to sell you on the idea that you
are a statutory "U.S. citizen" and "resident of
the United States."(INCORPORATED).
YOUR SIGNATURE IS YOUR MOST VALUABLE PROPERTY
Your property is pledged for the rest of your life upon your
signature and your promise to perform is pledged into perpetual debt. The
bankers don't even bother to go to court They leave it up to the agencies to
administer the agency corporate public policy. It is the public policy of that
agency to bill you on your promise to perform. If you don't pay, they follow up
on the public policy on notice of default and give you one more chance to pay.
Then they proceed to sell the property at a tax auction. They never go to court
or appear in court to back up their claim against you. Did any of your
government licensed and controlled teachers ever stress that your signature is
your most valuable personal property? Did your government teachers ever tell
you that any time you sign any document, you should sign it "without
prejudice," or with "All Rights Reserved" above
your signature. This means you are reserving your God given unalienable rights
which cannot be transferred and all other rights for which your forefathers
died.
The Corporate U.S.. Government provides, or at best pretends
to provide for this reservation of rights under the Uniform Commercial Code
(UCC) 1-207 and 1-103. You need more information in this area. It is not in the
best interest of the United States
Corporate "PUBLIC" schools to teach you about their
bankruptcy proceedings and how they have set the snare to Compel you into
paying their debt. The Corporate "PUBLIC" schools are
strictly designed for their Corporate citizen/subjects. That is. the Corporate
U.S.. Public School citizens.
Notice all the emphases on being
a "good" Citizen. Basically all their teachers and their
students are trained to produce labor and material in exchange for valueless
green paper called "money." It is not money, it
functions "AS" money. Lawful money must be backed by
something of value. Bankers take your labor, services, and material (homes,
cars, farms, etc.) in exchange for their valueless corporate paper. This paper
is backed only by the "full faith and Confidence of the United States
Government" THE MOTHER CORPORATION.
I do not have faith or confidence in the U.S. BANKRUPT CORPORATE
GOVERNMENT ADMINISTRATORS WHO HAVE PERVERTED THEIR Constitutional CHARTER,
enslaving the sovereign American people into their bankruptcy obligations.
Their fraudulent money laundering process promotes your payment on the
corporate government's bankruptcy debt. This debt is mathematically impossible
to pay Off. You and your family are in continual financial bondage to the
international bankers. They love it so!
Black's Law Dictionary 1990, defines "Money
Changers" as: .....business of a banker... today handled by the
international departments of banks." Let me think for a moment, what did
Christ do to the Money Changers." Oh, Yes, he severely interfered with
their activity. Three days later he was crucified. Lincoln was killed for
interfering with the money changers. Kennedy was slaughtered for interfering
with the money changers.
Let's return to the subject of your property, and the tax
sale for not paying property taxes. In this situation under a standard deed
(not common law deed) you are actually in default. Not because you understand
the default or you like being in default, you just are in default of the tax
payment. So they put your property up for sale. At the tax sale, Joe Doe,
average American, bids on your property and gets it. Now, there is a procedure
he must go through step by step to establish. He is required to give you
another chance. You have six months and a day to pay off the default. If, at
this time, you pay off the amount the county says you owe, plus penalties,
interest, fines, etc., then your property is taken off default status and it is
yours to continue to pay taxes on the next year.
THE COVER-UP
There was a deal struck that, if any person who doesn't have
a lawyer to bring a case before the courts, and this person proves the fraud,
and speaks the truth about the fraud, the courts are compelled to not allow the
case to be cited or published anywhere. The courts cannot afford to have the
case freely available in the public archives. This would be evidence of the
fraud. That is why you can't hire an attorney. An attorney is compelled to
uphold the fraud.
"TRUST ME"
"I'm Here To Help You."
"I Have The Governments Permission To Practice Law."
"I'm A Member of the Bar."
"I'm Here To Help You."
"I Have The Governments Permission To Practice Law."
"I'm A Member of the Bar."
The attorney is there for one reason. That reason is to make
sure the bankruptcy scam (established by the corporate public policy of the
corporate Federal Government) is upheld. The lawyer's will cite no cases for
you that will go against the bankruptcy in corporate public policy. Whatever
the lawyers do for you is a bunch of Bull Shit. The lawyers have to support the
bankruptcy and public policy even at your expense. The lawyers can't go against
the corporate Federal Government statutes implementing, protecting and
administrating the bankruptcy.
For all cases cited, those in the US Code or the state
annotated code or any other source, you may be sure that they are only those
selected cases that support the public policy of bankruptcy. The legal system
has to work that way. After the last 30-40-50-60 years of cases after cases
having been decided based upon upholding the bankruptcy, how could the legal
system possibly allow someone to come into court and put in the record
substantial information and argument to prove the fraud?
BLOOD IN THE STREETS?
Can you imagine how damaging it would be, if they allowed
your case to be cited in another case, or if they allowed the public to examine
a copy of your brief that exposes evidence of the fraud? This exposure would
render null and void everything for which they have worked so hard. Wouldn't
this exposure make the people mad? Wouldn't this exposure mean there would be
blood running in the streets? Especially the cities where the poor people have
been really taken by this diabolical system. What they are concerned about is
that the case never be cited. That goes against the bankruptcy for fear of
exposing the bankruptcy and the people will then pick up their guns and shoot
the SOB's.
ATTENTION: LAW STUDENT!
You said you wanted to be a lawyer. Well, I hope you've read
this carefully, because here is the legal system you're headed to serve, and
serve you will. You say you wanted to be a lawyer so you can find out what oath
they're taking, in "secret", behind closed doors in solemn
preparation for the "business of the court" as judges and
lawyers.
Now you know the oath. The oath is simply to uphold the
bankruptcy. If you want to be a lawyer and want to make a living as a lawyer,
be careful. They will weed you out at the beginning if you don't bring in your
paperwork under the bankruptcy procedures. If you try to defend your clients
and try to help your clients they will get rid of you. They will pull your
license. So you spent all that money and time going to school under the guise
of helping people and you're wasting your time. Without a license you can't go
into a courtroom. I would think about this if I were you.
THE LAWYERS GUILD CONNECTION
Here is what happens. The American Bar Association is a
franchise of the Lawyers Guild of Great Britain. The American Bar Association
is not connected primarily with what happens in any case on the local level.
However, when a case leaves the local level, by that is meant, the state court,
city court or the justice of the peace, or even the federal court; and goes to
the appeal's court, it would appear that the American Bar Association takes
notice of the case. It would seem that the American Bar Association must have
an agreement that any action brought on appeal, must be reviewed by the
American Bar Association. If this is true, it would make sense. How else would
the American Bar Association, a branch of the Lawyers Guild of Great Britain,
which is the legal arm of the Rothschild's Dynasty, be able to monitor and
administer the corporate bankruptcy. It would appear that the American Bar
Association would be compelled to review all appeal cases and to make certain
any case brought under common law or the constitutional law that would expose
the bankruptcy, would be immediately stamped on the back that "this
case is not to be cited or published." I believe that this is the
stamp origin and purpose of the stamp message in such cases. The justice
department may be able to do that in Washington D.C.. I can't see where any
judge or lawyer could have the authority to stamp or label the case as one not
to be cited for future cases. I think that is an official stamp from the
American Bar Association.
THE BANKRUPTCY ACCOUNTING SYSTEM
Now, Mr/Ms. Law Student, if you're still attending classes
and you have a good professor, ask him/her about just where the stamp comes
from that you've seen on many cases. Just who put it on the paperwork and just
who authorized the citation restriction. Just who is tampering with the law.
There is one thing certain the creditor and or his agents are watching these
cases very carefully. The creditor and his agents must balance their books.
When you think of the IRS, be aware that the IRS is an agent of the creditor,
the corporate International Bankers. This is just one of the Bankers' state
side agencies. The General Accounting Office (GAO) is another agency they use
for this country.
This is where all the accounting goes on to keep track of
the debt. All the states have to send reports to Washington D.C. Washington
D.C. has to send reports to the (GAO). Take a look at your state Comptroller's
Annual Report to the Governor of your state. I found it in the library located
in the city of the corporate state capital. Look under "Trust
Fund" for each state sub-corporation like the state courts, IRS,
Banks, Education, etc. you will be amazed at the amount of money being pumped
into the Trust Fund from the various Corporate State Departmental Revenues (all
revenue is referred to as taxes: fines, fees, licenses, etc.). There are
millions and billions of your hard earned worthless federal reserve
notes,"dollars", being held in "trust."This money
is being siphoned off into the coffers of the International Bankers while the
corporate government officials are hounding you for more and more tax dollars.
All this accounting system is NOT so the people will know
what is going on. The accounting reports are for the bankers and creditors to
keep tabs on just where their collections are coming from. The bankers want to
know if the bankruptcy debt payments are coming in and just how much and from
what sources. This accounting is the purpose behind M1, M2, M3, M4. and M5. All
this accounting is closely monitored. Maybe every day, but at least once a
week. These M's are the reports of the amounts of money in circulation. The
amount of debt out there, and the amount of credit out there. The floating of
debt in the form of bonds. There are five different categories. This system had
to come into existence in order for the creditors to be on top of the
bankruptcy at all times. This system allows the creditors to figure out and
know exactly what is going on in their domain.
It all makes sense. Don't the bankers hire bill collectors?
Creditors hire bill collectors to snoop around do see why you're not paying.
They want do know how much you are going to pay so they can figure out how much
will be coming in. How much they will collect. They want to know who will pay
and who won't.
THE WHOLE SYSTEM IS NOTHING BUT CREDIT AND DEBT.
THE WORLD CREDIT UNION
Here is what is going to very quickly happen
internationally. All of the governments around the world are going to unite.
They will create one big giant credit union for collecting the debt for the
International Bankers. We have allowed ourselves do get into this very sad
situation, but THAT IS THE WAY IT IS.
The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of
folly is to fill the world with fools. -- "State Tamperings with
Money Banks" -- Herbert Spencer (1820-1903)
WELCOME TO YOUR NEW WORLD ORDER
This Page on the Web started Dec 7, 1996,
The 55th Anniversary of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor,
which precipitated the entry of the United States into World War 2.
The 55th Anniversary of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor,
which precipitated the entry of the United States into World War 2.
IN
MEMORIAM
Of the many Sovereign Citizens in all wars
Who believed they gave their Oath and their Lives to Defend
The Constitution for the United States against all Enemies,
Both Foreign and Domestic,
In the Preservation of Liberty and Freedom and Justice for All.
Of the many Sovereign Citizens in all wars
Who believed they gave their Oath and their Lives to Defend
The Constitution for the United States against all Enemies,
Both Foreign and Domestic,
In the Preservation of Liberty and Freedom and Justice for All.
No comments:
Post a Comment