Monday, November 11, 2013

TRUTH ABOUT OBAMACARE...

FYI-"HERE IS THE TRUTH OF THE SUPREME COURT ABOUT OBAMACARE...PASS IT ALONG AND KEEP A COPY OF THIS FOR YOURSELF

Charlie Blake - People of The USA .We are being played for fools. Chief Justice Roberts did not say Obamacare was constitutional...read his RULING ..He said that the mandate was NOT Constitutional and that the ONLY WAY THAT the federal government could enforce Obamacare is to enforce it as a tax....WELL here is where the Obamacare mandate is unconstitutional. Right when Justice Roberts made that ruling, THE ACA should have gone BACK to congress and should have been VOTED ON BY EACH MEMBER OF CONGRESS AS A TAX .. IT WAS NOT .. The House did not pass Obamacare as a tax...they said that it was NOT a tax..DO NOT BE FOOLS, PEOPLE .. OBAMACARE IS ILLEGAL ..ALSO, THE ACA Originated in the SENATE and a Tax cannot originate in the Senate (Article I, Section 7, Clause 1)...PLUS...OBAMA has unlawfully changed the law by giving exemptions ..HE CANNOT DO THIS ..He is an Alinski Disciple, Radical revolutionary and his lap dog Main Stream media Knows the Alinski rules and is REPEATING THE LIE over and over and over again so it becomes the new reality.. JUST BECAUSE YOU HEAR SOMETHING ON THE NEWS DOES NOT MAKE IT ACCURATE .. They are trying so hard to make us all believe that Obamacare is legal and IT IS NOT LEGAL...Take the IRS to court if THEY try to garnish your bank account when you OPT-OUT ..go to (generation opportunity.org) AND (cchfreedom.org). There will be a chance for class action law suits against the Federal Government, but we cannot take them to court until they try to tax us for not having health insurance .
PLEASE SHARE THIS."

DA DOES 10 DAYS IN JAIL for sending innocent man to jail for 25 years...

WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TX — A corrupt former prosecutor will face a rare penalty for intentionally withholding evidence in a trial that sent an man to prison 25 years ago. For robbing an innocent man of decades of his life, the ex-D.A. will spend now have to spend 10 days in jail.
The case takes us back more than two decades. On the morning of August 13, 1986, the body of Christine Morton was found beaten to death with a wooden object in her bed. Her sheets were stained with blood and semen, and her credit card was missing. Her husband, Texas grocery store manager Michael Morton had not been home since 5:30 a.m., but was seized as the prime suspect. He had no arrests, convictions, or history of violence against anyone at that time. He was charged and put on trial for his wife’s murder.
The prosecution, led by district attorney Ken Anderson, presented no physical evidence or witnesses that tied Michael Morton to the crime. They hypothesized that Morton had beaten his wife to death before going to work because she refused to have sex with him on his birthday. The prosecution claimed that Morton arranged the scene to look like a burglary, and that he masturbated on his wife’s corpse.
Michael & Christine Morton with baby Eric, 1986.  (Source: KVUE)
Michael & Christine Morton with baby Eric, 1986. (Source: KVUE)
These charges came while Anderson was sitting on evidence that could have redeemed Michael Morton. The Mortons’ 3-year-old son, Eric, had been present during the murder. According to Eric, the murderer was not his daddy, but a “monster.” Young Eric had described the crime scene and murder in great detail, and specifically told investigators that his “Daddy” was “not home” when it happened.
Additionally withheld was the fact that Mortons’ neighbors told investigators that a man had repeatedly parked a green van on the street behind the crime scene and walked off into a nearby wooded area, days before the murder. Then there was the inconvenient fact (for the prosecution) that the victim’s missing credit card had been used at a San Antonio jewelry store.
None of this evidence was released during the trial. On February 17, 1987, Michael Morton was convicted of murder and given a life sentence.
Ken Anderson coldly and knowingly ruined an innocent man’s life to advance his career. The conviction made Anderson look like a hero, and he went on to enjoy a fruitful 25 year career, which eventually propelled him to the position of Williamson County State District Judge.
Morton immediately appealed his conviction, but this appeal was denied. A 1990 DNA test of the bedsheet semen stain failed to clear Morton of the crime because the semen was his own. In 2005, more DNA tests were performed at the request of the Innocence Project and the law firm of Raley & Bowick in Houston. Only some of the evidence was allowed to be tested. Again, the results could not clear Morton, as the DNA samples allowed to be tested matched Morton. After all the crime scene was where he slept, so of course his DNA would be found everywhere. Only the discovery of foreign DNA would redeem Morton.
Finally in 2010, Morton’s attorneys successfully appealed the denial of testing on the bloody blue bandana covered in hair that was found 100 yards from the crime scene. In 2011, the samples were determined to be the victim’s blood and hair, found alongside the DNA from another unknown male. The DNA was ultimately linked to a convicted felon from California, Mark Alan Norwood.
Michael Morton after being exonerated following nearly 25 years in prison. (Source: Callie Richmond for The Texas Tribune)
Michael Morton after being exonerated following nearly 25 years in prison. (Source: Callie Richmond for The Texas Tribune)
Michael Morton was released on October 4, 2011, after spending nearly 25 years in prison. He was officially exonerated on December 19, 2011. The real killer, Norwood, was convicted in March 2013.
Now that the cold case had been thrust back into public view, publicity was drawn to the corruption that had taken place more than 2 decades earlier. All of the evidence that had been withheld was suddenly seeing the light of day, and making a certain respected judge look like a criminal.
A month after Norwood’s conviction, a warrant was issued for the arrest of Judge Ken Anderson. He was charged with 3 felonies related to evidence tampering.
“Mr. Anderson consciously chose to impair the availability of the exculpatory evidence so he could obtain the conviction of Mr. Morton for murder,” Judge Sturns said.
After initially fighting the charges for several months, Anderson finally struck a bargain with prosecutors. The criminal charges of tampering with evidence were dropped, and on November 8th Anderson entered a plead guilty to being in contempt of court in 1987, when he told Morton’s trial judge that he had no favorable evidence to give to Morton’s lawyers.
Contempt of court. Like when someone speaks out of turn in front of a judge.
Anderson will face a penalty of ten (10) days in jail, and serve 500 hours of community service. He will also have to retire early, since he will lose his law license.
Some are celebrating the rare occasion that a corrupt prosecutor is facing any punishment at all. Others are cringing at the incredibly light sentence. Is this really justice? How many others were victims of this man’s criminal conscience?
“When you have individuals like Ken Anderson who engage in misconduct, such people tend to be serial offenders,” said Innocence Project co-founder Barry Scheck, describing Anderson as a “disgrace.”
Morton graciously said that he “never wanted Anderson’s head on a stick,” but instead exhibited some of the optimism that helped him survive 25 years in prison, saying that he hopes to see some laws get reformed. He said that it was a “good day.”
Some will embrace that optimism and celebrate this as a step in the right direction. Others are waiting for word of Anderson’s early release due to good behavior, and the reading on to the next injustice of the day.

Sunday, November 10, 2013

OBAMACARE IS ILLEGAL!!!

FYI-"HERE IS THE TRUTH OF THE SUPREME COURT ABOUT OBAMACARE...PASS IT ALONG AND KEEP A COPY OF THIS FOR YOURSELF

Charlie Blake - People of The USA .We are being played for fools. Chief Justice Roberts did not say Obamacare was constitutional...read his RULING ..He said that the mandate was NOT Constitutional and that the ONLY WAY THAT the federal government could enforce Obamacare is to enforce it as a tax....WELL here is where the Obamacare mandate is unconstitutional. Right when Justice Roberts made that ruling, THE ACA should have gone BACK to congress and should have been VOTED ON BY EACH MEMBER OF CONGRESS AS A TAX .. IT WAS NOT .. The House did not pass Obamacare as a tax...they said that it was NOT a tax..DO NOT BE FOOLS, PEOPLE .. OBAMACARE IS ILLEGAL ..ALSO, THE ACA Originated in the SENATE and a Tax cannot originate in the Senate (Article I, Section 7, Clause 1)...PLUS...OBAMA has unlawfully changed the law by giving exemptions ..HE CANNOT DO THIS ..He is an Alinski Disciple, Radical revolutionary and his lap dog Main Stream media Knows the Alinski rules and is REPEATING THE LIE over and over and over again so it becomes the new reality.. JUST BECAUSE YOU HEAR SOMETHING ON THE NEWS DOES NOT MAKE IT ACCURATE .. They are trying so hard to make us all believe that Obamacare is legal and IT IS NOT LEGAL...Take the IRS to court if THEY try to garnish your bank account when you OPT-OUT ..go to (generation opportunity.org) AND (cchfreedom.org). There will be a chance for class action law suits against the Federal Government, but we cannot take them to court until they try to tax us for not having health insurance .
PLEASE SHARE THIS."

Friday, November 8, 2013

SOCIAL SECURITY CHECKS!!!

SOCIAL SECURITY CHECKS!
Here we go!!!
JUST REALIZED THAT WITH REQUIRED AUTO DEPOSIT, I NEVER GET TO SEE THE CHECK ....
ALERT EVERYONE YOU KNOW.
THIS AFFECTS ALL OF US.*
*Subject:*
SOCIAL SECURITY becomes FEDERAL BENEFIT CHECK
Have you noticed, the Social Security check is now referred to as a
"Federal Benefit Payment"?
I'll be part of the one percent to forward this. I am forwarding it because it Touches a nerve in me, and I hope it will in you.
Please keep passing it on until everyone in our country has read it.
The government is now referring to our Social Security checks as a Federal Benefit Payment.
This isn't a benefit. It is earned income! Not only did we all contribute to Social Security but our employers did too.
It totaled 15% of our income before taxes .
If you averaged $30K per year over your working life, that's close to $180,000 Invested in Social Security .
If you calculate the future value of your monthly investment in social security( $375/month, including both your and your employers contributions) at a meager 1% Interest rate compounded monthly, after 40 years of working you'd have more than $1.3+ million dollars saved!
This is your personal investment
.
Upon retirement, if you took out only 3% per year , you'd receive $39,318 per year, or $3,277 per month .
That's almost three times more than today's average Social Security benefit of $1,230 per month,according to the Social Security Administration
(Google it - its a fact).
And your retirement fund would last more than 33 years (until you're 98 if you retire at age 65)! I can only imagine how much better most average-income people could live in retirement if our government had just invested our money in low-risk interest-earning accounts .
Instead, the folks in Washington pulled off a bigger Ponzi scheme than Bernie Madoff ever did.
They took our money and used it elsewhere.
They forgot (Knew) that it was OUR money they were taking.
They didn't have a referendum to ask us if we wanted to lend the money to them .
And they didn't pay interest on the debt they assumed .
And recently,they've told us that the money won't support us for very much longer .
But is it our fault they misused our investments?
And now, to add insult to injury, they're calling it a benefit , as if we never worked to earn every penny of it.
Just because they borrowed the money, doesn't mean that our investments were a charity !
Let's take a stand .
We have earned our right to Social Security and Medicare.
Demand that our legislators bring some sense into our government .
Find a way to keep Social Security and Medicare going, for the sake of that 92% of our population who need it.
*Then call it what it is: Our Earned Retirement Income. *
99% of people won't forward this.
Will you?

Thursday, November 7, 2013

This very Graphic!!!

Subject: Wow! This is Graphic!


cid:3E5FD4963B814FACA02AEE8A07A70932@D1P27BC1

cid:21C53EC3EE894BB0A46EDBFF125B4341@D1P27BC1
cid:E60C0D5C8580405F9E68F1D575EBF3A7@D1P27BC1
cid:CA4639F2B716403B9A40078FDBFF02A5@D1P27BC1
A proud moment if you’re a socialist. Why work when its free.
cid:33A44C353C0444189D083027875675CD@D1P27BC1

Socialism on the rise, and yet government expanded. Of course, it takes more idiots to do the work of one.
cid:7E330124CF70448C9C7D2007E5C38999@D1P27BC1
cid:97AF2E7E92F94315BDC0596478ACFDBA@D1P27BC1
Who is going to pay for the food stamps, health care, illegal immigrants, and the rest of the free stuff when more people are taking than working?
cid:971C4AA8CE8C4AFEB2502048D2F080AF@D1P27BC1

cid:5702426DC2904FFF895E8F107AFB0E6D@D1P27BC1
Outrageous, don't they take enough money from us already?cid:E8B6984F3D8D4F96B8FFC805D0A427B5@D1P27BC1
HOW CAN YOU HELP? Send copies of this letter to at least two other people. 100 would be even better.

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Important Pass it on!

TOO IMPORTANT A POSSSIBILITY NOT TO PASS ON!!!!

OIC- this explains why Obama cancelled his “Asian Tour”? Is our U.S. Constitution now “trash”? Most states don’t think so! MEH Pentagon Warns To Expect “Radical” Change In US Government Soon Posted by EU Times on Oct 5th, 2013 // 13 Comments

A highly troubling “urgent bulletin” issued earlier today by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MoFA) states that it has received information from the Main Intelligence Directorate (GRU) warning to expect a “radical change” in the government of the United States, possibly within the next fortnight, based on information they have received from “highly placed” sources within the Pentagon.

According to this MoFA bulletin, GRU intelligence assets were notified by their Pentagon counterparts this past week that President Barack Obama is preparing to invoke the powers given to him under 50 USC Chapter 13to hold that various American States are now in a “state of insurrection” thus allowing him to
invoke the National Emergencies Act under 50 USC § 1621and invoke the highly controversial “continuity of government” plan for the United States allowing him, in essence, to rule with supreme powers.

Specifically, this bulletin says, Obama will invoke 50 USC § 212that states: “the President shall have declared by proclamation that the laws of the United States are opposed, and the execution thereof obstructed, by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings”

The specific laws being opposed by these “combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings,” that Obama will outline in his reasoning’s for declaring a state of emergency, this bulletin continues, are the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act(PPACA), otherwise known as Obamacare.

The NDAA is opposed by many US States, this bulletin says, with California joining Alaska and Virginia this past week in passing a law making it illegal to be enforced in their territory, and with many other States, also, preparing to do the same.

The specific portions of the NDAA law being opposed by these US States allows for the indefinite detention without charges or trial of all American citizens and allows for their assassination should Obama order it.

The PPACA (Obamacare) law is, likewise, opposed by over half of the US States and has led to an American “shutdown” this past week that has closed 15% of their government, but has left fully 85% of it still open.

To the specific “combinations too powerful” Obama will cite in his declaration of National Emergency as being needed to be defeated by extraordinary measures, the MoFA says, is a faction of the US House of Representatives popularly known as the Republican Tea Party whom the President and his allies have likened to “hostage takers” and “political terrorists.”


Obama’s greatest fear, and reason(s) for declaring a National State of Emergency, this bulletin continues, was outlined yesterday by his US Treasury Department who released a report yesterday warning of potentially “catastrophic” damage should Congress fail to raise the debt ceiling and
prevent the government from defaulting on its debt.

As the current US government shutdown crisis and debt ceiling fight have now merged, the MoFA warns in this bulletin, Obama further warned yesterday that an impasse on the debt ceiling beyond 17 October, when the US government will be essentially out of cash to pay its bills, could start a downward economic plunge worse than the recession of five years ago – with credit markets seizing up, the dollar’s value plummeting and US interest rates soaring and even coming close to the brink of such an unprecedented default that could roil both domestic and foreign financial markets.

Preparing to oppose Obama, should he, in fact, declare a National State of Emergency, the GRU grimly warns, is the US military who themselves are preparing to invoke 50 USC § 842which allows them to protect America from “The Communist Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to overthrow the Government of the United
States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof…”

Not known to many Americans is that the Progressive movement Obama belongs to, and whose media acolyte “presstitutes” swept into office, have long been associated with the Communist Party. And, as the World Net Daily News Service reported this past August, John C. Drew, Ph.D., the award-winning political scientist, met Obama in 1980 and wrote in 2011: “[Obama] believed that the economic stresses of the Carter years meant revolution was still imminent. The election of Reagan was simply a minor set-back
in terms of the coming revolution. … Obama was blindly sticking to the simple Marxist theory … ‘there’s going to be a revolution.’ Obama said, ‘we need to be organized and grow the movement.’ In Obama’s view, our role must be to educate others so that we might usher in more quickly this inevitable revolution.”

With Obama’s “revolution” now at hand, the GRU warns in this bulletin, it is critical to note that that United States, unlike other nations, have all of their elected officials and military personal swear allegiance to the US Constitution, and not to their government or its leaders. The most recent example of this conflict between Obama and the US military, the GRU further states, was in Egypt when the Obama regime supported Muslim Brotherhood was overthrown by the Pentagon backed Egyptian military, and who, like
the United States, makes its political and military leaders swear allegiance to their constitution, not to any of its leaders.

As many in America now know that these present times are not the normal activities of a government seeking peace and prosperity, and as dozens of undisclosed Obama Presidential directives that define US national security policy and task government agencies are still unknown either to the public or, as a rule, to the US Congress, this bulletin warns in its summation that with each passing day American
can be more likened to a communist dictatorship than a functioning democracy. So bad, in fact, has the United States become that one of its legendary reporters, Pulitzer Prize winner Seymour Hersh wrote this past week that the Obama administration lies systematically yet none of the leviathans of American media, the TV networks or big print titles, challenge him.

Even worse, and in a further Sovietization of American Life by the Obama regime, the US this past week refused to grant entry visas to internationally renowned authors Ilija Trojanov and Ernst Titovets who were invited to speak at conferences, and which Justin Raimondo of the highly respected Antiwar.com blog calls “part of a disturbing pattern of repression that all points to one ineluctable conclusion:
the United States is the Soviet Union of the new millennium – an ideological state with global ambitions that holds itself up as the epitome of “freedom” and yet is the single most powerful enemy of liberty worldwide.
”

This how the government workd...



If nothing else has pissed you off about this administration this might get to you. The US has entered into a contract with a real estate firm to sell 56 buildings that currently house U.S. Post Offices. The government has decided it no longer needs these buildings, most of which are located on prime land in towns and cities across the country. The sale of these properties will fetch about $19 billion. A regular real estate commission will be paid to the company that was given the exclusive listing for handling the sales. That company is CRI and it belongs to a man named Richard Blum. Richard Blum is the husband of Senator Dianne Feinstein. (Most voters and many of the government people who approved the deal have not made the connection between the two because they have different last names). Senator Feinstein and her husband stand to make a fortune (est. at between $950 million and $1.1 billion!!) from these transactions. His company is the sole real estate on the sale. CRI will be making a minimum of 3% and as much as 6% commission on each and every sale. All of the properties that are being sold are all fully paid for. They were purchased with U.S. taxpayers’ dollars. The U.S.P.S. is allowed free and c lea r, tax exempt use. The only cost to keep them open is the cost to actually keep the doors open and the heat and lights on. The United States Postal Service doesn't even have to pay county property taxes on these subject properties. Would you put your house in foreclosure just because you couldn't afford to pay the electric bill? Well, the folks in Washington have given the Post Office the OK to do it! Worse yet, most of the net proceeds of the sales will go back to the U.S.P.S, an organization that is so poorly managed that they have lost $117 billion dollars in the past 10 years! No one in the mainstream media is even raising an eyebrow over the conflict of interest and on the possibility of corruption on the sale of billions of dollars’ worth of public assets. How does a U.S. Senator from San Francisco manage to get away with organizing and lobbying such a sweet deal? Has our government become so elitist that they have no fear of oversight? And it's no mere coincidence that these two public service crooks have different last names; a feeble attempt at avoiding transparency in these type of transactions. Pass this info on before it's pulled from the internet. Verified on Snopes: http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/blum.asp