CLIMATE CHANGE REJECTED BY SUPREME COURT

Obama was put into office for one reason and one reason only. He was put into office to end capitalism, private property ownership and the individual’s right to self-determination. This is all accomplished through Agenda 21 and ultimately what Patrick Wood calls technocracy. Technocracy is the take over of all energy use, thus, ultimately, all finance, through programs such as capping CO2 emission, Cap and Trade, etc.  Carbon credits, under this system is destined to become the new currency.

     When Obama was first elected, he attempted to introduce legislation into the Senate which would have reduced energy output for the United States by 80%. Even the then liberal Senate promptly rejected his proposal. That defeat set Obama into another strategy of implementation, it would have to happen piecemeal and some of the change would have to be implemented at the local level (eg California’s Cap and Trade program). However, the change for this President’s ego did not come fast enough because we are in the final year of Obama’s presidency and he has not completed his main task and HIS ENTIRE CLIMATE CHANGE INITIATIVE WAS REJECTED BY THE CONSERVATIVE MEMBERS OF THE SUPREME COURT BY A 5-4 DEFEAT!!! Scalia was the main opponent.

     This defeat of Obama’s entire climate change initiative should not be overlooked as it puts the United States in direct collision course with the United Nations’ recent COP 21 agreements in Paris, which was blocked in a 5-4 vote by the Supreme Court, only last week. Again, Justice Scalia was the main opponent. This fact alone should have provided the impetus to conduct an INDEPENDENT autopsy on Scalia’s body.

But as they say in the infomercials, there’s more….

Following the Gulf oil explosion in 2010, I wrote a seven part series entitled The Great Gulf Coast Holocaust. It was in that series that I discovered the unmistakable reason that Obama was made president.

Obama (when he was still a still a State Senator in Illinois), Valerie Jarrett and Al Gore headed a group known as the Joyce Foundation. The Joyce Foundation was designed to promote acceptance for carbon trading schemes which could be linked back to George Soros and Al Gore. The intent, as I have previously mentioned was to gain control over the entire economy. The Joyce Foundation eventually set up the Chicago Climate Exchange which was nation’s first bona fide carbon trading company. When Obama’s original carbon trading scheme was rejected in the Senate in 2009, the organization collapsed financially. But Obama’s dream of technocracy did not die with it.

The Joyce Foundation was also instrumental in bringing together NALCO, Goldman Sachs and the EPA in allowing the oil dispersant, Corexit, to be used in the Gulf even though, for health reasons, it had been banned by virtually the entire G20 nations. The conspiracy trail is mighty when it comes to Obama and his pre-presidential years and his complicity into the climate change issue. It was when Obama first became involved in the Joyce Foundation that George Soros, David Rockefeller and company backed this relative unknown for President. By the way, the late Bob Chapman and I both covered how Obama benefited from the use of Corexit through his Vanguard Investment funds (I and II). The link to this claim is listed above.

After I read volumes of material on the Joyce Foundation, it was easy to conclude that Obama was chosen to be President because he would virtually hand over the entire economy to a few wealthy bankers under the guise of climate change. The historical parallel matches why the banksters in 1912 backed Woodrow Wilson for President. The following year, the nation’s banking system was handed over the Rockefellers and their merry gang of banksters and the rest is history.

Conclusion

Scalia was the major impediment to Obama completing his legacy of ushering in technocracy. This, alone, is motive for murder. And when an autopsy is not conducted on a Supreme Court Justice, and then his “Catholic” body is cremated, we should all be more than suspicious.

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/02/16/the-motive-behind-the-murder-of-justice-scalia/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-motive-behind-the-murder-of-justice-scala.

This is your chance to Save America

A Ford Dealer's Report (Please don't delete this - !)

The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living. This is exactly why Mitt Romney said that 40 -something % of the people are too dependent on the government. They have learned to work the system.

A Ford Dealer's Report From Tom Selkis' (Latham Ford) Facebook - True story at the dealership.

"I'll try to make this as short and to the point as I can. One of my salesmen here had a woman in his office yesterday wanting to lease a brand new Focus. As he was reviewing her credit application with her he noticed she was on social security disability.

He said to her you don't look like you're disabled and unable to work. She said well I'm really not. I could work if I wanted to, but I make more now than I did when I was working and got hurt (non-disabling injury).

She said the gov't sends her $1500.00 a month in 1 check. And she gets $500.00 a month on an EBT card (food stamps), and $800.00a month for rent.

Oh yeah, and 250 minutes free on her phone. That is just south of $2800.00 a month. When she was working, she was taking home about $330.00 per week. Do the math and then ask yourself why should she go back to work.

If you multiply that by millions of people, you start to realize the scope of the problem we face as a country.

Once the socialists have 51% of the population in that same scenario, we are finished.

The question is when do we cross that threshold if we haven't already, and there are not enough people working to pay enough taxes to support the non-working people?

Riots?? Be prepared to protect your homes.

She didn't lease the Focus here because the dealer down the road beat our deal by $10.00/month. Glad to know she is so frugal with her hard earned money."

How passing info onto others in America is having an effect...

PASS THIS ON TO 10

10 pass it on to their 10
100 then pass it on to their 10
1,000 then pass it on to their 10
10,000 then pass it on to their 10
100,000 then pass it on to their 10
1,000,000 then pass it on to their 10
10,000,000 then pass it on to their 10
100,000,000 then pass it on to their 10
Yes, through the power of the Internet America is becoming aware.
So, we realize this doesn't seem like we're doing much when we pass these on to our 10, but we CAN help by getting the word out. Media refuses to cover such issues.

PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO YOUR 10.

CONSTITUTIONAL FREE ZONES

1. The Constitution-Free Zone of the United States – Bill of Rights ...

www.bisbee.net/wp/bisbee-today/the-constitution-free-.

2. Border search exception - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_search_exception

3. Do You Live In The Constitution-Free Zone Of The US? | Techdirt

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130212/0204532194...

100 Mile Constitution Exemption Zone = Loss of 4th Amendment Rights

July 11, 2014 Action Alerts, Agenda 21, Property Rights, Water Rights

We ran across something that greatly disturbed us as we were researching illegal immigration.  U.S. District Judge Korman has decided that the border — the area 100 miles inland from the entire U.S. border — falls under a “border exemption” and is being called a “Constitutional Exemption Zone”… all in the name of “national security”.  People that are in this area are subject to being stopped and searched at random.  So, our Constitutional Rights are being SUSPENDED in the 100-mile Constitutional Exemption Zone?  Does this affect EVERYONE?  What does this all mean, and to what can it lead?  What is being planned for all of us in this ‘exemption zone’?
The Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect us from unreasonable search and seizure, including arbitrary and random stops and searches.

U.S. CONSTITUTION – AMENDMENT IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Within 100 miles of the U.S. border, however, these rules DO NOT apply.
Constitutional Exemption Zones are being implemented by the Department of Homeland Security.  It appears that this federal agency isn’t really securing the borders but are extinguishing the Fourth Amendment Rights of over 197 million people within 100 miles of the border… and the ocean?
Secure The Republic is very concerned about this new “Constitutional Exemption Zone”.  What is REALLY going on?  Most of our metropolitan cities fall within this area.  2/3 of Americans (197.4 MILLION people) will be affected by this.  These people could find themselves WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.  If the 4th Amendment can be removed (the one which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures), so can the other amendments!   It appears that our borders are being eliminated and the sovereignty of our country is under attack.
This map from the ACLU is hard to beat because it shows the 100-mile “Constitutional Exemption Zone” visually, including cities which will be affected.  Take a look for yourself!  Pay special attention to the GREAT LAKES area.  We’ll comment more about that in the future…

https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights-constitution-free-zone-map

Border search exception law and legal definition  This is the Border Exception Law that is being implemented.  The power to conduct warrantless search is referenced under 8 USCS § 1357.  This is covered in the link.
Folks, this is not about border security.  Our borders haven’t been secure in MANY years.  This is about losing state sovereignty and our constitutional rights.  This includes dropping national borders. Remember, it’s a well-orchestrated plan that has been slowly coming together and will strip us of our constitutional rights.  You’ll find that proponents of these random searches and seizures make it sound good, but we need to know where their true motivation lies…  It appears to us that we are in a type of police state.
Also, study your state constitution.  You may find that it no longer describes the boundaries of your state, effectively abolishing your state.  At last check, the only states that still lay out their boundaries in their constitutions are:  Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Nevada, New Mexico, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Arkansas’ Constitution has been checked, and their boundary is found in Article I under “Boundaries”.  The description of the boundary for your state may be found in a different location than Article I in your particular state’s constitution.
When the State borders are no longer in the State Constitution, it is the signal that the State has lost its sovereignty.  WAKE UP AMERICA!  Is your state boundary being abolished?  Think about it another way:  would you buy a piece of property that has no legal definition?
In order to better understand this, you will need to obtain a copy of your present state constitution to see if your state legislature has removed the boundaries of your state.  The only way that these changes can be made is to change the state constitution and the U.S. Constitution.  The promoters of Regional Governance and a One-World Government know this.  It looks like STATE BOUNDARIES WILL HAVE TO BE ABOLISHED BEFORE REGIONAL GOVERNANCE and a ONE-WORLD GOVERNMENT CAN BE FULLY ENFORCED IN THE UNITED STATES.  Once this happens, there will be a centralization of power.  State boundaries have already been abolished in 33 of 50 states!
We wanted to make you aware of the dangers which we could face if we don’t abide by our U.S. Constitution, but you’ll need to do your own in-depth research on this topic.
So, we’d better beware of a Constitutional Convention (Con-Con) / Article V Amendment Convention / Convention of States that could rewrite the Constitution!
Be looking for more information in the future from us, and please forward this email to everyone you know!

Securing the blessings of liberty,

Secure the Republic

SecureTheRepublic.com
Info@SecureTheRepublic.com

TOO GOOD NOT TO PASS ON...

Railroad tracks.
 

The U.S. Standard railroad gauge (distance  between the rails) is 4 feet, 8.5 inches. That's an exceedingly odd number.

 

Why was that gauge used? Because that's the way they built them in England , and English expatriates designed the U.S. Railroads.

 

Why did the English build them like that? Because the first rail lines were built by the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways, and that's the gauge they used.

 

Why did 'they' use that gauge then? Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they had used for building wagons, which used that wheel spacing.

 

Why did the wagons have that particular Odd wheel spacing?
 

Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon wheels would break on some of the old, long distance roads in England , because that's the spacing of the wheel ruts.

 

 

So, who built those old rutted roads?
 

Imperial Rome built the first long distance roads in Europe (including England ) for their legions. Those roads have been used ever since.

 

And the ruts in the roads? Roman war chariots formed the initial ruts, which everyone else had to match for fear of destroying their wagon wheels.

 

 

Since the chariots were made for Imperial Rome , they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing. Therefore, the United States standard railroad gauge of 4 feet, 8.5 inches is derived from the original specifications for an Imperial Roman war chariot. In other words, bureaucracies live forever.

 

So the next time you are handed a specification, procedure, or process, and wonder, 'What horse's ass came up with this?' , you may be exactly right.  Imperial Roman army chariots were made just wide enough to accommodate the rear ends of two war horses .

 

Now, the twist to the story:

 

When you saw a Space Shuttle sitting on its launch pad, you will notice that there are two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters, or SRBs. The SRBs are made by Thiokol at their factory in Utah.

 

The engineers who designed the SRBs would have preferred to make them a bit larger, but the SRBs had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site. The railroad line from the factory happens to run through a tunnel in the mountains and the SRBs had to fit through that tunnel. The tunnel is slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track, as you now know, is about as wide as two horses' behinds.

 

So, a major Space Shuttle design feature of what is arguably the world's most advanced transportation system was determined over two thousand years ago by the width of a horse's ass.  And you thought being a horse's ass wasn't important!

Now you know, Horses' Asses control almost everything.

 

Explains a whole lot of stuff, doesn't it?

ASSAULT RIFLES PROTECTED UNDER 2ND AMENDMENT

Federal appeals court rules ‘assault rifles’ are protected under 2nd Amendment

Posted By: Watchman
Date: Friday, 5-Feb-2016 17:08:22

The ruling states that modern sporting rifles such as AR and AK platforms are not ‘unusual’ or especially dangerous and are, in fact, in common use in the United States as defensive weapons. The same argument applies to standard capacity magazines. These firearms are, therefore, protected under the Second Amendment for civilian use. It sent the lower court’s ruling back for reevaluation. This is a big deal. A Federal appeals court dealt a potentially serious blow to Maryland’s landmark 2013 gun control law and similar measures across the country, ruling Tuesday that a lower court was wrong when it upheld the state’s ban on assault rifles. In a 2-1 decision applauded by gun rights advocates, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit concluded that the semiautomatic weapons and high-capacity magazines banned by Maryland’s Firearm Safety Act “are in common use by law-abiding citizens.” As a result, they don’t fall under the exception to the right to bear arms that applies to “unusual” weapons such as machine guns and hand grenades, the court said. Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh said Thursday that the decision “conflicts sharply with rulings of other federal appellate courts.” Frosh said he would appeal — either to the full 15-member 4th Circuit or to the U.S. Supreme Court. The lower court must now use “strict scrutiny” to uphold the Maryland law banning the rifles and magazines. This is a very difficult, but not impossible, hurdle for the court to jump. More to come. http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/federal-appeals-court-rules-assault-rifles-protected-under-2nd-amendment/152959#more-152959