Showing posts with label gun confiscation. Show all posts

Thursday, October 16, 2014

IS THIS TRUE?

[7:42:15 AM] Neil Keenan: HAIL HAIL TO THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OR NOT????????? HAS THE CORPORATION FINALLY STEPPED DOWN? THIS IS WHAT I HAVE FOR NOW.

[2:28:08 PM] Neil Keenan: Listen I am not sure if this is true or not but I believe not and I bring it to you so you know what it is like to wait for the rightful answer.
in its entirety…..I will know for sure later but for now this is what I have received and I doubt if true but you never know. I know some of the names and some are and some are not real players and have been involved in things off color over the years. Here you are. We are on top of it.
[2:28:17 PM] Neil Keenan: BREAKING NEWS:
1. At 2 pm Obama signed with the Chinese, bankrupting the Federal Reserve and the Federal Reserve is being swallowed up by the UST under new leadership.
2. At 6 PM PST, Robert Won is going to go in and sign over the gold.
3. At Midnight EST the Organic Act of 1871 is repealed and the US Corporation is NO MORE. Long live the REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES, ONE NATION UNDER GOD WE TRUST!
4. At Midnight PST, “the Admiral” goes in.
5. At midnight PST, IRAQ goes in to include the REINSTATEMENT rate of 3.58 internationally and with a $6 – 8.00 US rate, to gather in IQD for oil credits.
6. General Ham is taking over the US Government and Commander Fairfield is taking over the Treasury.
[2:28:31 PM] Neil Keenan: I will let you know asap…..

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

BIGGEST HOLES IN THE WORLD...

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Sunday, January 26, 2014

FW Social Security

A little history never hurt anyone……
History Lesson on Your Social Security Card

Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn't know this.
It's easy to check out, if you don't believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what's what and it doesn't matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are Facts.

Social Security Cards up until the 1980s expressly stated the number and
card were not to be used for identification purposes. Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the message, NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION, was removed.

An old Social Security card with the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message.
Our Social Security

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social
Security (FICA) Program. He promised:

1.) That participation in the Program would be
Completely voluntary,

No longer Voluntary

2.) That the participants would only have to pay
1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program,

Now 7.65% on the first $90,000

3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year,

No longer tax deductible

4.) That the money the participants put into the independent 'Trust Fund' rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program, and,

Under Johnson the money was moved to The General Fund and Spent

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income.

Under Clinton & Gore
Up to 85% of your Social Security can be Taxed

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month -- and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to 'put away' -- you may be interested in the following:

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent 'Trust Fund' and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the 'tie-breaking' deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US

Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?

AND MY FAVORITE:

A: That's right!

Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments! The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

Then, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it! If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. But it's worth a try. How many people can YOU send this to?

Actions speak louder than bumper stickers

PLEASE DO KEEP THIS ONE ROLLING ACROSS THE COUNTRY. HOPEFULLY IT WILL OPEN A FEW EYES!!!!!!!

Wednesday, January 22, 2014

Teacher looses job for writing the President..?.

SHE WILL PROBABLY LOSE HER JOB..............

This teacher has more guts than our entire Congress, Supreme Court and the Obama administration. GOD bless this teacher.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/s403x403/968875_558446557546165_1882092969_n.jpg

A TEACHER FROM THE GREAT STATE OF MISSOURI WILL LOSE HER JOB FOR STANDING UP FOR ALL OF US.

Give this teacher and true American a standing ovation. This 4th grade teacher has said it all, and she was brave enough to attach her name to it.

The White House1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington , DC 20500

Mr. Obama:

I have had it with you and your administration, sir. Your conduct on your recent trip overseas has convinced me that you are not an adequate representative of the United States of America collectively or of me personally.

You are so obsessed with appeasing the Europeans and the Muslim world that you have abdicated the responsibilities of the President of the United States of America. You are responsible to the citizens of the United States . You are not responsible to the peoples of any other country on earth.

I personally resent that you go around the world apologizing for the United States , telling Europeans that we are arrogant and do not care about their status in the world. Sir, what do you think the First World War and the Second World War were all about, if not the consideration of the peoples of Europe ?

Are you brain dead? What do you think the Marshall Plan was all about? Do you not understand or know the history of the 20th century? Where do you get off telling a Muslim country that the United States does not consider itself a Christian country?

Have you not read the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution of the United States ? This country was founded on Judeo-Christian ethics and the principles governing this country, at least until you came along, come directly from this heritage. Do you not understand this?

Your bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia is an affront to all Americans. Our President does not bow down to anyone, let alone the king of Saudi Arabia You didn't show Great Britain , our best and one of our oldest allies, the respect they deserve yet you bow down to the king of Saudi Arabia.

How dare you, sir! How dare you! You can't find the time to visit the graves of our greatest generation because you don't want to offend the Germans, but make time to visit a mosque in Turkey! You offended our dead and every veteran when you give the Germans more respect than the people who saved the German people from themselves. What's the matter with you?

I am convinced that you and the members of your administration have the historical and intellectual depth of a mud puddle and should be ashamed of yourselves, all of you.

You are so self-righteously offended by the big bankers and the American automobile manufacturers, yet do nothing about the real thieves in this situation, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Frank, Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelic, the Fannie Mae bonuses, and the Freddie Mac bonuses. What do you intend to do about them? Anything? I seriously doubt it.

What about the U.S. House members passing out $9.1 million in bonuses to their staff members on top of the $2.5 million in automatic pay raises that lawmakers gave themselves? I understand the average House aide got a 17% bonus. I took a 5% cut in my pay to save jobs with my employer. You haven't said anything about that. Who authorized that? I surely didn't! Executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be receiving $210 million in bonuses over an eighteen-month period, that's $45 million more than the AIG bonuses. In fact, Fannie and Freddie executives have already been awarded $51 million not a bad take. Who authorized that and why haven't you expressed your outrage at this group who are largely responsible for the economic mess we have right now?

I resent that you take me and my fellow citizens as brain-dead and not caring about what you idiots do. We are watching what you are doing and we are getting increasingly fed up with all of you. I also want you to know that I personally find just about everything you do and say to be offensive to every one of my sensibilities.

I promise you that I will work tirelessly to see that you do not destroy my beautiful country.

Sincerely, A real American

Ms Kathleen Lyday
Fourth Grade Teacher
Grandview Elementary School
11470 Hwy . CHillsboro , MO 63050

PS: I rarely ask that emails be passed around ...but PLEASE SEND THIS TO YOUR EMAIL LIST...it's time for all Americans to wake up !

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Treason in the White House...

Subject: UN Gun "Treaty"
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:03:35 -0600

REWARDING RAPISTS (and where it leads).

If the following is true (and I have no doubt it is); ask yourself the questions that follow it. Jim

Obama-Kerry United Nations Treaty Requires US To Hand Over American Gun Registrations

21 January 2014 / 18 Comments

Did you know this? During September of 2013, John Kerry “on behalf of President Obama and the United States of America”, said (lied?) at the United Nations in New York,

“This treaty will not diminish anyone’s freedom. In fact, the treaty recognizes the freedom of both individuals and states to obtain, possess, and use arms for legitimate purposes. Make no mistake, we would never think about supporting a treaty that is inconsistent with the rights of Americans … to be able to exercise their guaranteed rights under our constitution.”

But here’s where he misled you about the UN Arms Trade Treaty…

The New American reports that the UN Arms Trade Treaty was written in secret by the Obama/Hillary Clinton State Department, along with Russia, China, France and Britain.

Not exactly a lineup of champions of liberty.

What does the treaty actually say?

Article 2 defines the conventional arms covered, which include battle tanks,  artillery systems, combat aircraft,  attack helicopters, warships, missiles — and “small arms and light weapons.”

Article 3 of the treaty places UN prohibitions on “ammunition/munitions fired, launched or delivered by the conventional arms (including small arms) covered under Article 2.”

Article 4 puts all “parts and components” of weapons (including small arms) within the scheme.

QUESTIONS:

How can ANY American elected politician or bureaucrat (government employee) THAT TAKES AN OATH TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION (this by definition and of necessity includes THE BILL OF RIGHTS, i.e. the first 10 Amendments, and all subsequent and un-repealed Amendments)…. How can such a person do ANYTHING IN ANY WAY, THAT USURPS, CHANGES OR DESTROYS ANY PART OF THE Constitution in any way under the color of “office”?

How can any action they take in such regard be found legal or justifiable or legitimate in ANY way?

When any such person or persons does such thing under nefarious circumstances such as clandestinely drafting and negotiating a “Treaty” with the intent of manufacturing federal jurisdiction to authorize the usurpation of the 2^nd Amendment to register and confiscate “Arms” and “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms” outside the specific rules laid out in the Constitution for Amendments by creating a “Treaty” with no accountability by other signatories (true of ALL UN “TREATIES”) or by attempting to disguise this destruction of the 2^nd Amendment as a “needed Treaty” that equates America and Americans with 2-Bit Dictatorships and the arming of rebels engaged with the forced change or overthrow of both just and unjust governments: WHY ARE THESE CONSTITUTIONAL-DESTROYER PERPETRATORS NOT REMOVED FROM OFFICE AND CHARGED WITH HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS?

What is next?

- A UN “Treaty” requiring government approval of all comments or speech on government and government policies?

- A UN “Treaty” requiring government approval of all written material concerning government or government policies?

- A UN “Treaty” requiring government licensing of all religious organizations and what they may or may not preach?

- A UN “Treaty” requiring government approval of any public assembly?

- A UN “Treaty” authorizing searches and seizures at government whim?

- A UN “Treaty” to authorize serial prosecutions and the forcing of persons to witness against themselves until they are found guilty or innocent as “needed” by government?

- A UN “Treaty” making all private property subject to absolute government control and policies?

- A UN “Treaty” that forbids any diffusion of National authority wherein “Lower” States, any Congress or any Court System limits or influences The National Supreme Elected Official?

HELLO! Is there anybody out there?

Jim Beers

21 January 2014

If you found this worthwhile, please share it with others.

Tuesday, January 14, 2014

URGENT MOVEMENT STARTED BY ARMED FORCES...

VET'S BACKLASH AGAINST OBAMA, URGENT!

> A movement has been started by our armed forces, to
> get out the vote in 2014.. They are organizing
> themselves, but this can be done by all of us. The
> President, the Commander in Chief, has made the Rules of
> Engagement (ROE) so difficult, that our troops are
> often killed before they can even get permission to
> fight. Nothing has been done to stop our troops from
> being murdered by Afghanis they are training, either.
> Now, the President wants the US to sign on to the UNs
> International Criminal Court (ICC), which would allow
> the UNs ICC to arrest and try US troops for War Crimes,
> without the legal protections guaranteed under US Law,
> and from which there is no appeal. The President, with
> his Democratic control of the Senate, has nearly all
> the power. If the Non-Establishment can take back the
> Senate in 2014, our troops can once again be protected
> from unnecessary danger. Please consider this, and
> send it on to your mailing lists. Thank You
> and Semper Fi,
>
> Interestingly enough, when GWB
> was president you heard about the the military
> deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan almost daily.
> With Obama in the White House, the mainstream media has
> been strangely quiet.
>
> More than 1,000
> American soldiers have lost their lives in Afghanistan in
> the last 27 months. This is more than the
> combined total of the nine years before.
> Thirty have died in August. During the last month, over
> 50 additional NATO and US servicemen have
> been murdered, inside jobs by those who
> are hired to be a force for good in Afghanistan.
>
> The commander in
> chief is AWOL. Not a peep, although he ordered the
> White House flag flown at half-staff for
> the Sikhs that were killed. There is a
> deep disgust, a fury, growing in the ranks of the military
> against the indifferent incompetence of
> this president.
>
> It has taken on a
> dangerous tone. No one knows what to do about him, but
> the anger runs deep as the deaths continue
> with no strategic end in sight to the
> idiocy of this war. Obama has had 4 years to end this futile
> insanity, during which time he has vacationed,
> golfed, campaigned, and generally ignored the plight of
> our men and women in uniform. But, there
> is now a movement afoot in the armed
> services to launch a massive get out the vote drive against
> this president.
>
> Not just current
> active duty types, but the National Guard, Reserves, the
> retired, and all other prior service
> members. This is no small special interest
> group, but many millions of veterans who can have an
> enormous impact on the outcome of the
> November election if they all respond.
>
> The million military
> retirees in Florida alone could mean an
> overwhelming victory in that state if they
> all show up at the polls. It might not
> keep another one hundred U.S. troops from
> dying between now and November, but a turn
> out to vote by the military against this heart breaking lack
> of leadership can make a powerful
> statement that hastens a change to the
> indifference of this shallow little man who just lets our
> soldiers die.
> Veterans: Please forward to your
lists. High Priority!

Tuesday, January 7, 2014

CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AGAINS OBAMA

Class action against Obama unprecedented: A. L. Webre

Sun Jan 5, 2014 4:32PM

Interview with Alfred Lambremont Webre

Share | Email | Print

Press TV has interviewed Alfred Lambremont Webre, international lawyer, Vancouver about US Republican Senator Rand Paul who plans to file a lawsuit against US President Obama over the NSA's unlawful spying activities.
What follows is an approximate transcript of the interview.

Press TV: I'd like to get your thoughts on how significant it is that a serving United States senator is planning to sue the president over the espionage activities of the NSA?
Webre: This is an unprecedented and historic law suit. No class action law suit of this sort and of this magnitude has ever been brought and it's crucial for the integrity of the US Constitution and has worldwide implications.
On the one side we have defending the Constitution US District of Columbia judge Richard Leon who found that the NSA data collection program was unlawful and almost Orwellian in nature. We also have besides Senator Rand Paul, Ken Cuccinelli who is Virginia's former attorney general who will be the lead lawyer in this, bringing on hundreds of thousands if not up to a million or more Americans in class action.
On the other side, to show you how sharply the contrast is we have the US Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the FISA court, which ruled on Friday that the NSA can continue for at least another 90 days and there was a ruling by a US District court for the district of New York that based on 9/11...
And that's the false flag operation of September 11th 2001 where it's now been shown that that was an inside job by the federal government, by the US government in which George W. Bush, Richard B. Cheney and Donald H. Rumsfeld were personally culpable on down to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
And so they're saying that because that was a US government operation, now that justifies the NSA.

So there could not be a more sharply defined lawsuit on which the future of the constitutional order in the United States of America now depends.

Myself and all legal scholars and all constitutional scholars call upon all Americans with cell phones to rise up and to join this lawsuit.
Press TV: As you mentioned you are an expert on the issue. Speak to us more about this class action suit on the grounds that this suit will proceed upon – and at the end of the day will it stick, will the charges stick if this class action suit sees its day in court?
Webre: There are two issues here: one issue is the constitutionality of the NSA's surveillance program; the second issue is whether you can bring a class action under it.
Both of these are highly contentious because you have a split between the New York district court, which found on the basis of 9/11 that the NSA was doing something lawful and you have the Washington DC district finding that it is Orwellian. And that will go to the US Supreme Court.
What the US Supreme Court will do we don't know because as in this case of Obama Care there is now evidence that even the Chief Justice of the United States may have been suborned to vote on behalf of Obama Care where he voted it as a tax. He was a swing vote.
So we don't know what the integrity of the US Supreme Court will be. So this is just an amazing fight.
With regard to the other issue – the issue of the class action, this is where the popular voice will come in, the hundreds of thousands if not millions of people coming in.
These are very arcane issues. Usually class actions come in under commercial lawsuits. Here they are coming in under a constitutional lawsuit brought by a sitting US Senator.
This is precedent-breaking law brought by the Virginia State former Virginia attorney general. This is something that's going to be followed.
SC/AB