REAL AMERICAN HISTORY

REAL AMERICAN HISTORY 101

Attila (/ˈætɨlə/ or /əˈtɪlə/; ?–453), frequently referred to as Attila the Hun, was the ruler of the Huns from 434 until his death in March 453. Attila was a leader of the Hunnic Empire, which stretched from the Ural River to the Rhine River and from the Danube River to the Baltic Sea.

During his reign, he was one of the most feared enemies of the Western and Eastern Roman Empires. He crossed the Danube twice and plundered the Balkans, but was unable to take Constantinople. His unsuccessful campaign in Persia was followed in 441 by an invasion of the Eastern Roman Empire, the success of which emboldened Attila to invade the West.  He also attempted to conquer Roman Gaul (modern France), crossing the Rhine in 451 and marching as far as Aurelianum (Orléans) before being defeated at the Battle of the Catalaunian Plains.

Subsequently he invaded Italy, devastating the Northern provinces, but was unable to take Rome. He planned for further campaigns against the Romans but died in 453. When Attila the hun took Khazaria he killed all the males taller than the axel on his chariot and took the women as slaves.

The Illuminati started in Khazaria. They were an empire of merchants and gold tenders that had only one minor export. Around 899 AD, Khazararia’s ruler adopted “Judaism”/ Within just one generation, the Kharazarians were “tracing their lineage” back to King David.

Khazaria fell from financial corruption and the inhabitants spread into Europe around 1589. There on, from Amsterdam, they began calling themselves Jews. The Society L’Orange conspired and the Rothschild’s (red shield) scheme was born. This group of usurers then took over all of Europe’s royalty.

When America, the colony revolted. It did so against the Bank of England (really, the “Crown”)  who controlled King George/ The revolution put George Washington in debt to Haym Solomon, who put the Star of David above the eagle on the Great Seal of the US as a result.  They erected the 1st National Bank.

When that bank charter ended, they demanded another. America refused and that resulted in the War of 1812, wherein Britain reinvaded on the Bank’s money. They burned don the White House. As a result, the 2^nd National Bank was erected, Andrew Jackson became a hero in that war, and in the mid 1850’s ran for President on the premise that he would “Kill the Bank”. This was something he got to proclaim successfully towards the end of his life.

Yet, in no time, the Illuminati caused the Civil War in America. When Lincoln who wanted America to have its own currency debt-free won (“greenbacks”), he was assassinated. The wealthy opposition to the reinstitution of “the Bank” were sunk with the titanic. 

The “Federal Reserve” (the 3^rd Bank) was erected in 1913. They put George Washington’s face on the $1. They put Andrew Jackson’s face on the $20. They put Abraham Lincoln’s face on the penny.

The next opposition to the 3^rd Bank came from JFK. He was shot in the face in front of the entire country. They put JFK’s face on the half $. Here we are today, the “Federal” Reserve owns all government media, corporations, $, and you.

Check your 14^th amendment status. Are you a citizen of the State? Are you a citizen of the United States or are you a citizen of the ‘corporate’ United States (the land encompassing Washington DC)?  

ARE YOU A 14TH AMENDMENT CITIZEN?

DEAR 14TH AMENDMENT CITIZEN,

A BOOK TO OPEN YOUR EYES OR TO GIVE TO SOMEONE THAT NEEDS TO PULL THEIR HEAD OUT OF THE POSTERIOR OF MAINSTREAM PROPAGANDA AND FACE REALITY.

Twenty years ago I wrote a book titled, THE FROG IS COOKED. Its about all the crimes this government committed and is committing against its citizens. Its as current today as it was when I wrote it. There are sections about plutonium being fed to pregnant mothers and US soldiers, There is a chapter on the REPORT FROM IRON MOUNTAIN and how The Rockefeller Foundation developed it further to manipulate the economy and citizens of this great country.

It can be ordered by going to my web sites and clicking on the book. www.GuardDogBooks.com
www.AlaskaPublishing.com

1) local cops today are IGNORANT about the rights of the people, and

2) That they're SCARED of losing control, and don't know how to handle people who are OUTSIDE of their corporate jurisdiction..

They wrongly believe that EVERYONE should be subject to their codes and statutes, when in reality, it's only those who are State RESIDENTS and/or who voluntarily use PRIVATE currency of District of Columbia as money, who are subject to statutory jurisdiction.

BTW, a 'sovereign citizen' that the LEO's refer to, is one who has woken up to the corporate Matrix of the United States, inc. And before someone starts arguing that citizens aren't sovereign, here's what the USSC said about that:

"In the United States, sovereignty resides in the people, who act through the organs established by the Constitution." Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 Dall. 419, 471;

BTW, that means that the source of SOVEREIGNTY is the People, and they delegate some of that sovereignty to State and federal gov't. So they OBVIOUSLY aren't subject to State legislatures and Congress, except where the gov't has an EXPRESS delegation of power to it, via the Constitution.

And OBVIOUSLY, the People of the US are American Citizens, because ONLY the People are sovereign, and that did NOT include blacks, as they couldn't, and still can't, be American (State) Citizens. And obviously, you couldn't deny a right to vote to one of the sovereign people.

This is a slightly humorous video of a woman who KNOWS who she is and what her rights in a republic are, but who gets nonetheless hunted by US policy enforcers.

State Citizenship was created when The Declaration of Independence was created. It wasn't until after the civil war and the 14th amendment that U.S. CITIZENSHIP was created. A U.S Citizen is a corporate Citizen, or fictitious person. Person is defined in the blacks law dictionary as natural or artificial. This woman was exercising her inalienable rights, whether she was intoxicated or speeding or on drugs, as there was no damage to any parties. You are yourself and yourself Sovereign. You are presumed to be yourself, your corporate identity. She was exercising her right to travel not her privilege to drive.

****************************************

Views: 858

ShareTwitter

< Previous Post

 Comment by Geoffrey Franklin yesterday

Methinks I am a private Citizen. The cops must stand under a private citizen as their jurisdiction only affords violence against the public.

 Comment by WesleyJ yesterday

Ok, well, first of all that lady caused a breach of the peace by not stopping and leading the cops on a high speed chase. Even Diplomats pull over and notice the cops of their status. Leading the cops on a high speed chase IS a threat to the public safety and the cops are well within their job description to put a stop to it. I don't like them wasting my time either. But I still stop and politely let them know I'm not interested in contracting with them. If you don't, and they cant tell that you are a peaceful inhabitant, they must presume you are a threat.

 Comment by Exzanty yesterday

They are not in thirty duty to stop you... They drive emergency vehicles... When they pull you over they're are committing felonies... Declaring a false obligation, making you think that you have to stop for them to Allah you... Declaring a false emergency by using his lights when there is none... That is straight from the gangster mafia type behavior... Stopping you and roving you... Then you're so brain washed you to where you're defending they're criminal activity...

 Comment by Exzanty yesterday

For some reason I can't see my words while I'm typing, but I hope you get the message...

 Comment by grandma sue yesterday

How do you get to the private side? I see what they have done to rod class. His cornobus (not sure of the spell) was dead on and judge Roberts of the corporate supreme court would not let his paper work out and sealed this stuff. I know I'm not the all caps name but how do I exercise my rights. Without harassment.

 Comment by Jay yesterday

Man or citizen

What Is A Citizen?

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Citizenship

Comment by ken johnson yesterday

grandma sue. i think we are always private. Either we are in our private capacity as a man or woman or we entered a private contract with the US.

Its pretty hard not to. We seem to contract at the bank, dmv, IRS, its endless. I presume we were given the NAME so we could contract with them. I always thought i was my NAME. i am wiser i suppose and now sign everything for my person w/o prejudice at arms length. i did that with the IRS last year and they audited my return. LOL. Didnt hear from them for 9 months. No fines , no harm. I suppose they are onto me now.

i dont think you can get into the public unless you are in a common law court of record.

so i dont know what the public vs private can possibly mean. Everything seems to be private. Thats why they get mad at us for trying to claim our rights in their courts. If we open our court, maybe thats public?

in anycase, i dont recommend using or citing their codes ever. you can Cf. or compare to their codes, but dont rely on them. They own them and change them.

 Comment by Geoffrey Franklin yesterday

As soon as Rod started arguing thereby creating a controversy his private status, if he ever had one, went out the window.

 Comment by WesleyJ yesterday

Remember, the US has been under "emergency" since Lincoln. There is always a dual nature to those things. Yes, they are pretending it's an emergency, but by NOT stopping and rebutting the presumptions they operate under, it now justifies the action taken to keep the peace. Read the Lieber codes, the US is an occupying force, whose first duty is to establish order. The cops, while private municipal corporations, were given authority to act as the occupying army. Hence the gold fringe on the flag on their arm patch. I suggest you study Boris at iamsomedude.com

 Comment by Sharon Croskey Smyth yesterday

Seems to me "sovereign citizen" is an oxymoron.  A citizen is a subject to all their copyrighted, privatized, corporate codes, rules, regulations, etc.  However, it is the intent that really counts 

Forced Drugging of US Troops...

Forced Mass Drugging of US Troops an Underreported Scandal

Soldiers being forced to pop pills by exempt officer class
Alex Jones & Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
August 19, 2013
The mass drugging of US troops is one of the most underreported scandals of the modern era, with soldiers not only being used as guinea pigs in a brave new world of pharmacological experimentation, but also having their rights stripped as a result.

Sgt. Joe Biggs recently joined the Alex Jones Show to describe in shocking details how he witnessed soldiers in Afghanistan displaying careless ignorance of the threat posed by IED’s because the troops were high on Percocet, a prescription painkiller based on oxycodone, a Schedule II narcotic analgesic which is derived from opium.

While US troops are supposedly guarding the poppy fields in Afghanistan (even as opium production continues to hit record highs),increasing numbers of American soldiers are becoming hooked on opiates, some of which are being prescribed to them.

There is now an epidemic of drug use in the U.S. military. Figures show that, “Since 1999, failed drug tests have increased in the U.S. Air Force by 82%, and in the U.S. Army by 37%.”

As Mike Adams documents, the Defense Department notes that “20 percent of U.S. troops are on psychiatric drugs, and that they are often handed as much as a 180-day supply of those pills before being deployed.”

The most underreported aspect of this whole scandal however is that troops are in many cases being forced to take prescription drugs against their will, while those in the officer class are often exempt from both the drugs and the increasing number of dangerous vaccines that are mandatory for new recruits.

“U.S. troops are being forced to take drugs like Prozac and Seroquel for anxiety and depression. Troops cannot refuse to take the drugs without consequences from their superiors. Resistance by U.S. troops to their orders is also running high. Some U.S. military patrols decline to carry out their “search and kill” missions and, instead, return to their bases claiming they carried out their orders,” reported Veterans for America.

Other drugs like Mefloquine are also causing soldiers to go on killing rampages, such as last year’s incident when Robert Bales shot dead 17 Afghan civilians including nine children. Drug abuse is also a core factor behind the shocking rise in soldiers committing suicide. A full third of all military suicides are attributed to side-effects from medication

However, the cycle of drug abuse does not end for US troops when they leave the military. Once hooked on prescription medications, veterans are forced to visit psychologists who diagnose them with mental disorders in order to keep a steady supply of drugs flowing and feed the dependency.

This in turn relegates veterans to become second class citizens, with their right to bear arms stripped as a result of being permanently labeled as having post traumatic stress disorder.

One of the core reasons why the Pentagon is encouraging the mass drugging of US troops is to grease the skids for the Marshal Plan, a long term agenda that will see all soldiers permanently drugged in order to produce “behavior-modifying and performance-enhancing characteristics”.

The mass drugging of US troops is another aspect of government social engineering. It is about creating yet another huge sector of society – just like children in school or foster care – whose dependence on the state is secured via the method of artificially creating a dangerous dependence on drugs.

Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71
FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

*********************

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Infowars.com and Prison Planet.com. He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a host for Infowars Nightly News.

This article was posted: Monday, August 19, 2013 at 10:07 am

Tags: gun rights, police state

Farmer acquitted for selling whole milk...

Sean Higgins

Senior Editorial Writer

The Washington Examiner

Email Author@seanghiggins

Popular in Politics

1. Marco Rubio: In immigration reform, legalization comes first — ‘It is not conditional’
2. Sales of George Orwell’s ’1984′ up 69 percent on Amazon
3. Obama scandals take toll on Ed Markey's bid for Massachusetts Senate seat
4. Tim Carney: Even law-abiding people should oppose surveillance
5. Edward Snowden: I mistakenly believed in Obama’s promises

It is a sad fact of modern life that seemingly everything is both heavily regulated by the government and politicized. This applies to, yes, even cow’s milk. Witness the case of Wisconsin farmer Vernon Hershberger, who was prosecuted for selling raw milk to willing consumers — in this case friends and neighbors:
The Wall Street Journal reports:

Jurors found Vernon Hershberger, a 41-year-old Loganville, Wis., farmer, innocent of producing milk without a license, selling milk and cheese products without a license, and operating a retail establishment without a license. He was found guilty of one count of breaking a holding order issued by the state in June 2010, which barred him from moving any of the food he produced without a license.

Sign Up for the Daily E-dition newsletter!

Please enter your email address below to begin receiving the Daily E-dition newsletter.

You must enter a valid email address in the field above!

Thank you for signing up for the Daily E-dition newsletter! You should receive your first newsletter very soon.

We're sorry, there was an error processing your newsletter signup. Please click here to visit our Newsletter Signup Center to register for this newsletter.

The verdict means Mr. Hershberger can continue to sell his farm’s products to members of the buying club he started, said one of his attorneys, Elizabeth Rich. He faces as long as a year in jail and $10,000 in fines for the one guilty count; a sentencing date has yet to be announced.
“This is a huge win for food rights,” said Liz Reitzig, a founder of Farm Food Freedom Coalition, a group advocating for greater consumer access to natural, unprocessed food. The case “should give small farmers renewed courage to continue to operate within their communities.”
Milk is commonly pasteurized to remove harmful bacteria, but advocates of raw milk say the process also wipes out many beneficial nutrients. Raw milk can be consumed on the farm but can’t be sold legally in many states, including Wisconsin.
The case followed a nearly four-year investigation of Mr. Hershberger and his farm, Grazin Acres LLC, by the state, the No. 2 dairy producer after California. During deliberations, which capped a five-day trial in Sauk County Circuit Court, dozens of farmers, food-rights activists and Hershberger family members filled the courthouse, sharing raw milk from Mr. Hershberger’s farm. (Emphasis added.)

The prosecution might have made sense if the consumers were not aware that the milk was not pasteurized but there is no evidence that was the case. In fact, it appears that people bought Hershberger’s product precisely because it was raw. The milk was apparently sold to only 200 people that Hershberger considered “part owners in the farm.”
So, why was the state eager to prosecute Hershberger? As the Journal article notes, it is being lobbied to do so by the “Wisconsin Safe Milk Coalition,” an industry lobbying group that doesn’t like competition from raw milk farms and is trying to bully them.
Meanwhile, many vegetarians and radical animal rights activists are anti-milk, arguing that drinking any form of it is both unhealthy and cruel to cows. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals once went so far as to urge college students to drink beer instead. (As if they needed any encouragement to do that.)

There still after your guns...

Dear Henry,

"Rumors of my demise may be a little exaggerated . . ."

Barack Obama’s declaration of his political vitality during a news conference on Monday should come as no surprise to gun owners.

Despite your recent defeat of his gun control bill in the U.S. Senate, Obama and the gun-grabbers are far from finished.

Late last week and over the weekend, Obama sent out an army of anti-gun surrogates -- Biden, Schumer, McCain, Manchin and McCarthy -- to make sure the American public knew that gun control is coming back before the end of 2013.

Expanded federal background checks. So-called “gun trafficking” legislation. New mental health mandates.

It’s all still VERY alive.

Vice-President Biden: “So I think we're going to get this anyway. I think this will pass before the year is out, within this Congress."

Sen. Chuck Schumer: "I think we will bring the bill back before the end of the year . . ."

Sen. John McCain: "I . . . agree with Chuck that I think the issue will come back."

Sen. Joe Manchin: "We're going to work it hard."

Rep. Carolyn McCarthy: "We do know that a number of Senators have been reaching out . . . if they can work with some of the other members [Senators] who voted 'no' . . ."

Combine the above information with John Boehner’s recent statement that he will “consider” anti-gun legislation in the House and you have a clear, concerted effort to ram gun control into law this year.

The “first principle” of being a gun rights activist is the recognition that there is always another battle around the corner.

Obama took a big political hit a couple of weeks ago when his bill went down. You should take a breath and celebrate, but only for moment.

Within hours of losing that battle, the gun-grabbers were already scheming for the next fight.

Bloomberg promised tens of millions of dollars to the effort.

Harry Reid marched to the floor of the Senate vowing to bring the bill back.

In the days leading up to the battle, my federal legislative team delivered close to four million petitions and nearly one million emergency faxes to U.S. Senate offices.

Capitol Hill insiders -- and even a number of U.S. Senators -- openly complained that the voice of gun owners “drowned out” that of the gun grabbers.

So, if you and I are to win the next show-down battle over our gun rights, we have to apply even more grassroots pressure.

That’s why it’s vital you take action again today by signing your NEW“No Gun Control, No Deals” petition to your U.S. Senators and Congressman.

And, as a reward for your grassroots activism, I’ll also be giving away THREE firearms -- but ONLY to individuals who click below and sign the petition.

Your petition signature is your entry into the firearms drawing.



Obama’s political history tells us that on left-wing “Holy Grail”issues such as gun control, he’ll come back again and again.

And, with Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill once again talking of “compromise” of your gun rights, it’s vital gun owners mobilize in opposition to their anti-gun schemes.

That’s why it’s so important you click here to sign your NEW “No Gun Control, No Deals” petition to your U.S. Senators and Congressman.

And as I mentioned above, by signing your petition, you’ll also be included in a drawing to win one of THREE firearms!

Flooding Capitol Hill with truckloads of petitions in OPPOSITION to ALL gun control schemes must be done continuously if you and I are going to protect our gun rights.

Thanks -- in advance -- for taking action.

For Freedom,

Dudley Brown
Executive Vice President

P.S. Obama deployed an army of anti-gun surrogates this weekend to warn the American people that his gun control bill will be back before the end of the year.

To stop Obama’s scheme dead in its tracks once again, gun owners must flood Capitol Hill with millions of petitions.

Please click on the image below to sign your NEW“No Gun Control, No Deals” petition RIGHT NOW!

When you sign, I’ll also enter you into a drawing for one of THREE firearms!

---

The National Association for Gun Rights is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, single-purpose citizens' organization dedicated to preserving and protecting the Constitutionally protected right-to-keep-and-bear-arms through an aggressive program designed to mobilize public opposition to anti-gun legislation. The National Association for Gun Rights' mailing address is P.O. Box 7002, Fredericksburg, VA 22404. They can be contacted toll-free at 1-877-405-4570. Its web address is www.NationalGunRights.org/

Not produced or e-mailed at taxpayer expense.

---

To help the National Association for Gun Rights grow, please forward this to a friend.

To view this email as a web page, please click this link: view online.

Help fight gun control. Donate to the National Association for Gun Rights!

US GOVERNMENT KILLED MORE CHILDREN THAN SANDY HOOK.

Government killed more unarmed children than Sany Hook