Showing posts with label wild game. Show all posts
Showing posts with label wild game. Show all posts

Thursday, September 3, 2015

CIVIL WAR

> To: Undisclosed-Recipient:;
> Sent: Thu, Sep 3, 2015 4:49 pm
> Subject: GENERAL HAM TO LEAD GRAND ARMY OF THE REPUBLIC
>
> I HAVEN’T BEEN ABLE TO CONFIRM THIS SPECIFIC STORY, BUT HERE’S A LINK
> TO STARS AND STRIPES THAT CONFIRMS HAM’S INVOLVEMENT; THIS IS PRETTY
> SERIOUS STUFF. I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS, E.G., HE’S BEEN APPOINTED BY
> THIS GROUP BUT HAS HE ACCEPTED THE APPOINTMENT? ETC. IF YOU HEAR
> ANYTHING ABOUT THIS, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. MB
http://www.stripes.com/retired-gen-carter-ham-to-head-army-force-structure-commission-1.341483
>
> This was re issued on the wires yesterday
>
> Issued to All Members of the Domestic Police Forces, US Marshals
> Service, the Provost Marshal, Members of the American Bar Association
> and the American Armed Services.
> These organic American states of the Union known as The United States
> of America (major) exercising plenary civil power upon the land hereby
> appoint General Carter F. Ham to lead and command The Grand Army of the
> Republic (GAR) and its successors under the guidance of the Joint
> Chiefs of Staff and with their full support.
>
> Should it become necessary to suppress commercial mercenary forces
> operating under the guise of being federal government agencies
> including but not limited to the Department of Homeland Security, the
> Federal Emergency Management Administration, the Internal Revenue
> Service, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, etc., General Ham
> shall assume immediate command and control of all armed forces and
> services owed to The United States of America (major) stationed in
> North America and shall join them under his Command as The Grand Army
> of the Republic. All forces of air, land, and sea are to be employed.
> Any cost or loss suffered as a result of deployment of The Grand Army
> of the Republic shall be charged as stipulated prior.
>
> All effort shall be made by The Grand Army of the Republic to spare
> life and property while undertaking any action whatsoever within the
> states of the Union without exception. The GAR is uniquely enabled by
> these Orders to operate on the land of the fifty (50) organic states
> for the purposes of securing the lives and property of the American
> States and American State Citizens. The GAR is not a foreign army and
> is composed primarily of American State Citizens.
> If required to take field position, the local commanders shall make
> every effort to communicate the basis of their authority and the
> reasons for their presence on American State soil to ensure a prompt
> cessation of hostilities and a widespread understanding of the
> usurpations and acts of fraud which have led to any conflict. All
> parties must be brought to understand the nature of the federal
> government, the limitations of its authority, and their own obligation
> to act in favor of the organic states of the Union. The Grand Army of
> the Republic shall continue to operate under General Order 100 known as
> the Lieber Code, extant from the pen of the last Republic President,
> Abraham Lincoln.
> No orders, Executive or otherwise, issued by Barack H. Obama pretending
> authority on the land of the American States while operating as
> “President” of the UNITED STATES Corporation nor as the “President” of
> the United States of America (minor) are owed any performance by the
> Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Ham, or any Ordinary. All plainly stated
> grants of contractual authority evident in The Constitution for the
> united States of America remain in place, subject to good faith
> performance of the accompanying obligations and treaties.
> Mr. Obama is the “President” of a governmental services corporation
> under contract to provide stipulated services to the organic states and
> is on their payroll. He otherwise acts as a foreign dignitary
> representing the United States of America (minor). In neither of these
> capacities is he allowed any granted authority to impose upon American
> State Citizens, endanger American State property, or command mercenary
> forces on American State soil, however veiled as federal civilian
> service agencies. We require the Joint Chiefs of Staff and General Ham
> to commence measures to disarm federal civilian agency personnel and to
> seize control of the vast stockpiles of arms which have been improperly
> amassed by “the Department of Homeland Security”, FEMA, and other
> agencies employed by the UNITED STATES.
>
> The only federal agency allowed free egress on the land of the American
> States is the U.S. Marshals Service, and then only when their personnel
> are engaged in their duty to protect the U.S. Mail and sworn to act as
> constitutional officers. All other federal agency personnel are limited
> to unarmed service until further notice.
> We direct the Joint Chiefs of Staff to communicate these first two
> General Civil Orders directly to Mr. Obama, the members of the “US
> Congress”, the administrators of all “federal” agencies, the members of
> the “Supreme Court” and those acting as “Governors” to compel their
> rapid understanding and cooperation.
>
> Any expense or damage incurred by these organic states or any American
> State Citizen as a result of actions undertaken by any federal agency
> personnel acting as armed mercenaries on American State soil will be
> understood as the result of violent crimes committed against the
> peaceful inhabitants of the land and will incur immediate judgment
> liquidating the assets of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the
> Federal Reserve (FEDERAL RESERVE) in payment of the stipulated
> reparations. Such crimes shall also be considered contract default
> increasing the public debt subject to bounty.
> Any and all corporate officers of the UNITED STATES or any successor
> organization(s) inheriting “federal” service contracts who support,
> condone, or promote such crimes against the American States or against
> American State Citizens shall be subject to arrest and prosecution for
> commercial and violent crimes. All foreign officials operating as
> elected or appointed officials of the United States of America (minor)
> who support, condone, or promote such crimes against the American
> States or against American State Citizens shall be subject to arrest,
> confiscation of their assets, and deportation to Puerto Rico, Guam, or
> such other “states” as may be willing to receive them.
> Such “foreign officials” include members of the American and British
> Bar Associations who were licensed to act as privateers against the
> interests of the American States and the American State Citizens from
> 1845 to 2013 in flagrant Breach of Trust. All such licenses are now
> extinguished. Members of the Bar Associations are required to cease and
> desist assaults against the American States and American State Citizens
> and shall be subject to arrest, confiscation, and deportation
> otherwise.
>
> Insomuch as corporate officers operating the United States of America,
> Incorporated, and the UNITED STATES have contrived under conditions of
> fraud and semantic deceit to re-venue the estates of the American
> States and living American State Citizens to the foreign jurisdiction
> of the United States of America (minor) they are found guilty of
> capital crimes, including acts of fraud and treason committed between
> 1933 and 1945, and are condemned posthumously. Insomuch as elected
> officials operating the United States of America (minor) have similarly
> committed war crimes against the American States and their peaceful
> inhabitants during the same time period, they stand condemned
> posthumously.
> No enforcement upon any American State or American State Citizen is
> owed as a result of any “Act” of any “Congress” operating as the
> sovereign government of the United States of America (minor), nor as
> the Board of Directors or Board of Trustees of any incorporated entity
> whatsoever.
>
> All those Estates and ESTATES erroneously believed to represent the
> American States and American State Citizens and which were conveyed by
> fraud and legal deceit to the United States of America (minor) and more
> recently to the City-State of the United Nations, are re-venued without
> exception to the geographically defined American States and the
> American State Citizens where they shall remain in perpetuity as assets
> belonging to the rightful and lawful beneficiaries.
> All legal fiction entities however structured and named after the
> American States and American State Citizens are returned to them and
> their control, free and clear of any debt, promise, encumbrance or
> obligation alleged against them as a result of false claims made “in
> their behalf” by officers of the United States of America, Inc. and the
> UNITED STATES, INC. or by any foreign officials operating the United
> States of America (minor), or the United Nations City State falsely
> claiming to “represent” them or have jurisdiction over them.
>
> We note that the current circumstance is in part the result of criminal
> acts engaged in 150 years ago, which resulted in the commercial
> enslavement of African Americans who were summarily claimed as chattels
> backing “US government” debt in the wake of the Civil War.
> Despite every act of abolition and declaration of prohibition against
> both peonage and slavery, it has been the policy of the “US government”
> to enslave its citizens and to operate as a rogue state among the
> nations of the world. Instead of freeing African Americans the sum
> total result of the Civil War was to vastly expand public sector
> ownership of slaves, giving rise to the outrageous and improper claims
> that have been made against the American States and the American State
> Citizens that we are dealing with today. It is uniquely fitting that
> The Grand Army of the Republic is recalled to settle this circumstance
> in favor of the people.
>

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Gun Control Unlawful...


Absolutely Amazing & Eloquent Constitutional Law & Our History Shows Federal Gun Control Is Unlawful

Please watch the 25 minute Video by Publius Huldah:
Publius Huldah's Web Site:
March 3, 2013 - Posted by | 2nd Amendment, armed citizens, gun control, marque and reprisal, Militia, Nullification by States, Nullification of unconstitutional acts, Resistance to tyranny, Tennessee Constitution | , , , ,
~~~~


Nunc Pro Tunc: The Coming Day of Burn Barrels and Blessings

This is a standing invitation to my fellow Americans: If congress ever enacts a law mandating the registration and/or a production ban of detachable magazine semiautomatic rifles then you are hereby invited to the town square of your local community. There, burn barrels will be set up and we will publicly burn Form 4473s, FFL Bound Books, state and local registration records, and the sales receipts for every firearm in the United States. On that same day, FFL holders and public officials holding electronic firearms records will simultaneously erase those records, permanently and irretrievably. (Using special file erasure software such as Blancco, X-Ways, and Stellar Wipe, or though the physical destruction of disk drives.)
Spontaneous Gatherings, Spontaneous Combustion
This burn barrel day--likely to be held the day after the President signs any new draconian legislation--will include speeches, public prayers, and the blessing of those who have gathered by ministers, rabbis, and priests.
The core of the activities on that day will be stalwart public defiance of any new unconstitutional law(s), the open and notorious destruction of records that might be used to enslave us, and vocal public affirmations of solidarity of free men and women, in the face of tyranny. This will be a defining moment for America--a line drawn in the sand. We will forthrightly declare that we will not obey any unconstitutional law and that we will treat it dismissively, as if it had never been enacted -- nunc pro tunc. We will pledge ourselves to the defense of liberty, both individually and collectively. We will vow that if ever called to jury duty, we will nullify any unconstitutional laws, vacating the charges against the accused, in accordance with our long-standing right as jurors. (See: www.FIJA.org.)
The Law is On Our Side
We will publicly re-affirm some long standing precepts of American jurisprudence, to wit:

§ 195 Generally
The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, whether federal or state, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law(1) but is wholly void(2) and ineffective for any purpose.(3) Since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it,(4) an unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed(5) and never existed;(6) that is, it is void ab initio.(7) Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.(8)

Since an unconstitutional law is void, it follows that generally the statute imposes no duties,(9) confers no rights,(10) creates no office(11) or liabilities,(12) bestows no power or authority on anyone,(13) affords no protection,(14) is incapable of creating any rights or obligations,(15) does not allow for the granting of any relief,(16) and justifies no acts performed under it.(17)

Once a statute is determined to be unconstitutional, no private citizen or division of the state may take any further action pursuant to its provisions.(18) A contract that rests on an unconstitutional statute creates no obligation to be impaired by subsequent legislation.(19) No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law,(20) and no courts are bound to enforce it.(21) A law contrary to the United States Constitution may not be enforced.(22) Once a statute has been declared unconstitutional, courts thereafter have no jurisdiction over alleged violations.(23) Persons convicted and fined under a statute subsequently held unconstitutional may recover the fines paid.(24)

FOOTNOTES:
1 Commissioners of Roads and Revenues of Fulton County v. Davis, 213 Ga. 792, 102 S.E.2d 180 (1958); State v. Village of Garden City, 74 Idaho 513, 265 P.2d 328 (1953); McGuire v. C & L Restaurant Inc., 346 N.W.2d 605 (Minn. 1984); People v. Corley, 91 Misc. 2d 255, 397 N.Y.S.2d 875 (City Crim. Ct. 1977).
2 Lewis v. Uselton, 224 Ga. App. 428, 480 S.E.2d 856 (1997); State ex rel. Stenberg v. Murphy, 247 Neb. 358, 527 N.W.2d 185 (1995); State v. Clark, 367 N.W.2d 168 (N.D. 1985); St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Getty Oil Co., 1989 OK 139, 782 P.2d 915 (Okla. 1989); Weegar v. Bakeberg, 527 N.W.2d 676 (S.D. 1995); Almond v. Day, 197 Va. 419, 89 S.E.2d 851 (1955).
3State v. One Oldsmobile Two-Door Sedan, Model 1946, 227 Minn. 280, 35 N.W.2d 525 (1948); Grieb v. Department of Liquor Control of State, 153 Ohio St. 77, 41 Ohio Op. 148, 90 N.E.2d 691 (1950); Hunter v. School Dist. of Gale-Ettrick-Trempealeau, 97 Wis. 2d 435, 293 N.W.2d 515 (1980).
4 Shirley v. Getty Oil Co., 367 So. 2d 1388 (Ala. 1979); Oliver v. State, 619 So. 2d 384 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1st Dist. 1993); Lewis v. Uselton, 224 Ga. App. 428, 480 S.E.2d 856 (1997); Trout v. State, 231 S.W.3d 140 (Mo. 2007); State ex rel. Stenberg v. Murphy, 247 Neb. 358, 527 N.W.2d 185 (1995); Texas Dept. of Family and Protective Services v. Dickensheets, 274 S.W.3d 150 (Tex. App. Houston 1st Dist. 2008).
5 Huffman v. Dawkins, 273 Ark. 520, 622 S.W.2d 159 (1981); Commissioners of Roads and Revenues of Fulton County v. Davis, 213 Ga. 792, 102 S.E.2d 180 (1958); Briggs v. Campbell, Wyant & Cannon Foundry Co., Division Textron Am. Inc., 2 Mich. App. 204, 139 N.W.2d 336 (1966), judgment aff'd, 379 Mich. 160, 150 N.W.2d 752 (1967); McGuire v. C & L Restaurant Inc., 346 N.W.2d 605 (Minn. 1984); State ex rel. Stenberg v. Murphy, 247 Neb. 358, 527 N.W.2d 185 (1995); State v. Clark, 367 N.W.2d 168 (N.D. 1985); St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Getty Oil Co., 1989 OK 139, 782 P.2d 915 (Okla. 1989); Glen-Gery Corp. v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Dover Tp., 589 Pa. 135, 907 A.2d 1033 (2006); Franks v. State, 772 S.W.2d 428 (Tenn. 1989); School Districts' Alliance for Adequate Funding of Special Educ. v. State, 149 Wash. App. 241, 202 P.3d 990, 242 Ed. Law Rep. 383 (Div. 2 2009); City of Fairmont v. Pitrolo Pontiac-Cadillac Co., 172 W. Va. 505, 308 S.E.2d 527 (1983).
6 Thomas v. North Carolina Dept. of Human Resources, 124 N.C. App. 698, 478 S.E.2d 816 (1996), aff'd, 346 N.C. 268, 485 S.E.2d 295 (1997); Weegar v. Bakeberg, 527 N.W.2d 676 (S.D. 1995).
7 People v. Manuel, 94 Ill. 2d 242, 68 Ill. Dec. 506, 446 N.E.2d 240 (1983); Lovgren v. Peoples Elec. Co., Inc., 380 N.W.2d 791 (Minn. 1986); Nevada Power Co. v. Metropolitan Development Co., 104 Nev. 684, 765 P.2d 1162 (1988); Town of Islip v. Paliotti, 196 A.D.2d 648, 601 N.Y.S.2d 926 (2d Dep't 1993); American Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Ingram, 301 N.C. 138, 271 S.E.2d 46 (1980).
8 Commissioners of Roads and Revenues of Fulton County v. Davis, 213 Ga. 792, 102 S.E.2d 180 (1958).
9 Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So. 2d 244 (1941); State ex rel. Stenberg v. Murphy, 247 Neb. 358, 527 N.W.2d 185 (1995); Franks v. State, 772 S.W.2d 428 (Tenn. 1989).
10 People v. Harvey, 379 Ill. App. 3d 518, 318 Ill. Dec. 756, 884 N.E.2d 724 (1st Dist. 2008); State ex rel. Stenberg v. Murphy, 247 Neb. 358, 527 N.W.2d 185 (1995); Nevada Power Co. v. Metropolitan Development Co., 104 Nev. 684, 765 P.2d 1162 (1988); Ethics Com'n of State of Okl. v. Cullison, 1993 OK 37, 850 P.2d 1069 (Okla. 1993); General Motors Corp. v. Oklahoma County Bd. of Equalization, 1983 OK 59, 678 P.2d 233 (Okla. 1983); Franks v. State, 772 S.W.2d 428 (Tenn. 1989); Geeslin v. State Farm Lloyds, 255 S.W.3d 786 (Tex. App. Austin 2008).

As to the effect of and rights under a judgment based upon an unconstitutional law, see Am. Jur. 2d, Judgments § 17.

As to the res judicata effect of a judgment based upon an unconstitutional law, see Am. Jur. 2d, Judgments § 752.

11 Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So. 2d 244 (1941); Franks v. State, 772 S.W.2d 428 (Tenn. 1989).
12 Liddell v. Heavner, 2008 OK 6, 180 P.3d 1191 (Okla. 2008).
13 Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So. 2d 244 (1941).
14 Nevada Power Co. v. Metropolitan Development Co., 104 Nev. 684, 765 P.2d 1162 (1988); Ethics Com'n of State of Okl. v. Cullison, 1993 OK 37, 850 P.2d 1069 (Okla. 1993); Franks v. State, 772 S.W.2d 428 (Tenn. 1989).

As to the limitations to which this rule is subject, see § 196.

15 State ex rel. Stenberg v. Murphy, 247 Neb. 358, 527 N.W.2d 185 (1995).
16 Helvey v. Dawson County Bd. of Equalization, 242 Neb. 379, 495 N.W.2d 261 (1993) (a court may not grant any relief based upon a statute which is nonexistent or a statute which has become nonexistent by reason of a judicial declaration of unconstitutionality).
17 Millet v. Rizzo, 2 So. 2d 244 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1941); Board of Managers of James Walker Memorial Hospital of Wilmington v. City of Wilmington, 237 N.C. 179, 74 S.E.2d 749 (1953); State ex rel. Tharel v. Board of Com'rs of Creek County, 1940 OK 468, 188 Okla. 184, 107 P.2d 542 (1940).

As to the effect of a declaration of unconstitutionality on acts performed under it, generally, see § 196.

18 Thomas v. North Carolina Dept. of Human Resources, 124 N.C. App. 698, 478 S.E.2d 816 (1996), aff'd, 346 N.C. 268, 485 S.E.2d 295 (1997).
19 Jones v. Columbian Carbon Co., 132 W. Va. 219, 51 S.E.2d 790 (1948).
20 Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So. 2d 244 (1941); Amyot v. Caron, 88 N.H. 394, 190 A. 134 (1937).
21 Chicago, I. & L.R. Co. v. Hackett, 228 U.S. 559, 33 S. Ct. 581, 57 L. Ed. 966 (1913); Payne v. Griffin, 51 F. Supp. 588 (M.D. Ga. 1943); Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So. 2d 244 (1941).
22 Painter v. Shalala, 97 F.3d 1351 (10th Cir. 1996); Bartlett v. Bowen, 816 F.2d 695 (D.C. Cir. 1987), opinion reinstated on reconsideration, 824 F.2d 1240 (D.C. Cir. 1987).
23 U.S. v. Baucum, 80 F.3d 539 (D.C. Cir. 1996).
24 Neely v. U.S., 546 F.2d 1059, 41 A.L.R. Fed. 331 (3d Cir. 1976).

From: § 195, American Jurisprudence 2d, Volume 16 (Conflict of Laws to Constitutional Law 1-359).
Never Again!
Recognizing the many sad lessons of civilian disarmament and subsequent genocides in the 20th Century, we will make bold and forthright statement: Never Again! We will not submit to the unlawful decrees of tyrants. We will not meekly go their jails and internment camps. We will fight for our liberty, to our dying breath.
Come Armed, Come Masked
I recommend that all adults who publicly assemble at these burn barrel events do so armed, as is our right. And those who come armed should also wear masks, to protect themselves from malicious prosecution. I plan to wear a Guy Fawkes mask, but you can wear a bandana, face muffler, or the face mask of your choice. Joining you, also wearing masks, will be many mayors, sheriffs and their deputies, chiefs of police and their officers, town council members, clergy, and people of all walks of life. We vastly outnumber the tyrants. The tyrants deserve nothing but our scorn and derision. Their fate is already sealed.
Plausible Denial
After this fateful day has come and gone, FFL holders and public officials will be able to recount: "I had no choice. My records were taken by men with guns who were wearing masks!" (So they'll have no excuse if they don't cooperate with this nationwide display of civil disobedience.)
God Bless The Republic. Down with Tyrants. We Will Prevail!
- James Wesley, Rawles - January 28, 2013
Note: Permission to reprint or re-post this piece in full by any method (printed or electronically) is granted by the author (James Wesley, Rawles), as a long as it is not altered in any way and it is reproduced in full.
~~~~
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
The Mother of All Stats
The Human Cost of "Gun Control" Ideas

The Genocide Chart © JPFO.org 2002
GovernmentDatesTargetsCivilians Killed "Gun Control" Laws Features of Over-all "Gun Control" scheme
Ottoman Turkey1915-1917Armenians
(mostly Christians)
1-1.5 millionArt. 166, Pen. Code, 1866
& 1911 Proclamation, 1915
• Permits required •Government list of owners
•Ban on possession
Soviet Union1929-1945Political opponents;
farming communities
20 millionResolutions, 1918
Decree, July 12, 1920
Art. 59 & 182, Pen. code, 1926
•Licensing of owners
•Ban on possession
•Severe penalties
Nazi Germany
& Occupied Europe
1933-1945Political opponents;
Jews; Gypsies;
critics; "examples"
20 millionLaw on Firearms & Ammun., 1928
Weapon Law, March 18, 1938
Regulations against Jews, 1938
•Registration & Licensing
•Stricter handgun laws
•Ban on possession
China, Nationalist1927-1949Political opponents;
army conscripts; others
10 millionArt. 205, Crim. Code, 1914
Art. 186-87, Crim. Code, 1935
•Government permit system
•Ban on private ownership
China, Red1949-1952
1957-1960
1966-1976
Political opponents;
Rural populations
Enemies of the state
20-35 millionAct of Feb. 20, 1951
Act of Oct. 22, 1957
•Prison or death to "counter-revolutionary criminals" and anyone resisting any government program
•Death penalty for supply guns to such "criminals"
Guatemala1960-1981Mayans & other Indians;
political enemies
100,000-
200,000
Decree 36, Nov 25 •Act of 1932
Decree 386, 1947
Decree 283, 1964
•Register guns & owners •Licensing with high fees
•Prohibit carrying guns
•Bans on guns, sharp tools
•Confiscation powers
Uganda1971-1979Christians
Political enemies
300,000Firearms Ordinance, 1955
Firearms Act, 1970
•Register all guns & owners •Licenses for transactions
•Warrantless searches •Confiscation powers
Cambodia
(Khmer Rouge)
1975-1979Educated Persons;
Political enemies
2 millionArt. 322-328, Penal Code
Royal Ordinance 55, 1938
•Licenses for guns, owners, ammunition & transactions
•Photo ID with fingerprints
•License inspected quarterly
Rwanda1994Tutsi people800,000Decree-Law No. 12, 1979•Register guns, owners, ammunition •Owners must justify need •Concealable guns illegal •Confiscating powers

Innocents Betrayed - The History of Gun Control

Watch the 57 minute 53 second Video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUmKT43j4Tc
~~~~

18 USC § 4 - Misprision of Felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
~~~~

18 USC § 2382 - Misprision of Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
~~~~

18 USC § 2381 - Treason

Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
~~~~

18 USC § 2383 - Rebellion or Insurrection

Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
~~~~

18 USC § 2384 - Seditious Conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. 

Friday, May 3, 2013

There still after your guns...




Dear Henry,

"Rumors of my demise may be a little exaggerated . . ."

Barack Obama’s declaration of his political vitality during a news conference on Monday should come as no surprise to gun owners.

Despite your recent defeat of his gun control bill in the U.S. Senate, Obama and the gun-grabbers are far from finished.

Late last week and over the weekend, Obama sent out an army of anti-gun surrogates -- Biden, Schumer, McCain, Manchin and McCarthy -- to make sure the American public knew that gun control is coming back before the end of 2013.

Expanded federal background checks. So-called “gun trafficking” legislation. New mental health mandates.

It’s all still VERY alive.

Vice-President Biden: “So I think we're going to get this anyway. I think this will pass before the year is out, within this Congress."

Sen. Chuck Schumer: "I think we will bring the bill back before the end of the year . . ."

Sen. John McCain: "I . . . agree with Chuck that I think the issue will come back."

Sen. Joe Manchin: "We're going to work it hard."

Rep. Carolyn McCarthy: "We do know that a number of Senators have been reaching out . . . if they can work with some of the other members [Senators] who voted 'no' . . ."

Combine the above information with John Boehner’s recent statement that he will “consider” anti-gun legislation in the House and you have a clear, concerted effort to ram gun control into law this year.

The “first principle” of being a gun rights activist is the recognition that there is always another battle around the corner.

Obama took a big political hit a couple of weeks ago when his bill went down. You should take a breath and celebrate, but only for moment.

Within hours of losing that battle, the gun-grabbers were already scheming for the next fight.

Bloomberg promised tens of millions of dollars to the effort.

Harry Reid marched to the floor of the Senate vowing to bring the bill back.

In the days leading up to the battle, my federal legislative team delivered close to four million petitions and nearly one million emergency faxes to U.S. Senate offices.

Capitol Hill insiders -- and even a number of U.S. Senators -- openly complained that the voice of gun owners “drowned out” that of the gun grabbers.

So, if you and I are to win the next show-down battle over our gun rights, we have to apply even more grassroots pressure.

That’s why it’s vital you take action again today by signing your NEW“No Gun Control, No Deals” petition to your U.S. Senators and Congressman.

And, as a reward for your grassroots activism, I’ll also be giving away THREE firearms -- but ONLY to individuals who click below and sign the petition.

Your petition signature is your entry into the firearms drawing.



Obama’s political history tells us that on left-wing “Holy Grail”issues such as gun control, he’ll come back again and again.

And, with Republicans and Democrats on Capitol Hill once again talking of “compromise” of your gun rights, it’s vital gun owners mobilize in opposition to their anti-gun schemes.

That’s why it’s so important you click here to sign your NEW “No Gun Control, No Deals” petition to your U.S. Senators and Congressman.

And as I mentioned above, by signing your petition, you’ll also be included in a drawing to win one of THREE firearms!

Flooding Capitol Hill with truckloads of petitions in OPPOSITION to ALL gun control schemes must be done continuously if you and I are going to protect our gun rights.

Thanks -- in advance -- for taking action.

For Freedom,

Dudley Brown
Executive Vice President


P.S. Obama deployed an army of anti-gun surrogates this weekend to warn the American people that his gun control bill will be back before the end of the year.

To stop Obama’s scheme dead in its tracks once again, gun owners must flood Capitol Hill with millions of petitions.

Please click on the image below to sign your NEW“No Gun Control, No Deals” petition RIGHT NOW!

When you sign, I’ll also enter you into a drawing for one of THREE firearms!



The National Association for Gun Rights is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, single-purpose citizens' organization dedicated to preserving and protecting the Constitutionally protected right-to-keep-and-bear-arms through an aggressive program designed to mobilize public opposition to anti-gun legislation. The National Association for Gun Rights' mailing address is P.O. Box 7002, Fredericksburg, VA 22404. They can be contacted toll-free at 1-877-405-4570. Its web address is www.NationalGunRights.org/

Not produced or e-mailed at taxpayer expense.

To help the National Association for Gun Rights grow, please forward this to a friend.

To view this email as a web page, please click this link: view online.

Help fight gun control. Donate to the National Association for Gun Rights!
donate