GET READY TO BE RAPED

THE SUDDEN RAPE OF THE WEST
AND HOW IT AFFECTS YOU

The current massive influx of supposed "refugees" into Europe is
having surprise-packed consequences.

1. Terrorists are pouring in with the flood of refugees.
2. Military aged men make up an estimated 70 % of the "immigrants".
3. They are determined to make Europe into what they want it to be.
4. There are almost daily reports of new rapes and gang rapes
   occurring throughout Europe.
5. While rape has always existed, what is happening now is new for
   our day. While rape has always followed war, this is something
   new - using rape as a tool of war.

Bill White, writing for Survivopedia, correctly notes that "Sweden
has become the rape capital of Europe and perhaps of the world, if
we leave out the lands controlled by ISIS."  
http://www.survivopedia.com/the-rise-of-rape-and-islam/?source=
newsletter

CAN YOU GUESS WHY?

The Muslim invaders apparently feel they have a right to any woman
they see.

This matches the teaching of their Imams and the Quran which states
that all lust is caused by women; it is not in the heart of the man.
Therefore the women are the ones who cause it.

In a recently published video, a female Muslim professor states that
the rape of non-Muslim women is acceptable in the Muslim religion.
It is to be used as a means to humiliate the women, the ultimate goal
being to force them to convert to Islam. There is even a reference
to the woman being converted by the sexual act.

Her specific statements refer to raping women captured in war, but
the invasion of Europe is a war in Muslim eyes.

The Quran commands Muslims to go to other lands and take the
position of being the heads over the people of the land. They are not
to put themselves under the authority of "infidel" non-Muslims or
their laws. That is a sin. They are to take over the lands.

This is called hijrah. It is as old as Islam itself. The first hijrah
was when Muhammed himself left Mecca to go to Medina. He and his
followers went there for the purpose of conquest, to take Medina and
force its population to convert to Islam.

This was the beginning of hijrah as a means of conquest. It has been
used ever since.

The Trojan Horse of the so-called Syrian "refugees" is not just the
terrorists who are hidden among them, but each and every Muslim. It
matters not if they are terrorists. They are all committed to the
spread of Islam. Refugees are being used as an excuse to send
millions of people into the western world for the purpose of conquest.

CAN A SMALL GROUP CONQUER A NATION?

A ridiculous statement, that such a small group could conquer a
nation?

The truth is, they have already taken over areas of several European
countries, and made them into "no-go" zones. Those areas are totally
under Muslim control and are governed by Sharia Law. The police and
the elected government of the nation have no power and no say. They
have, in effect, been kicked out. The area has effectively been
conquered.

This has been done with relatively few people, mere thousands.

What will happen when there are millions more?

Will fighting-aged male jihadis come to your city where they can wreak
havoc, just as thousands of Muslim “refugees” did in Germany,
Switzerland and Sweden on New Year’s Eve, 2016?

Hundreds of women were raped, robbed and beaten across Europe on New
Year’s Eve by the Syrian, Iraqi and other Islamic “refugees” who have
flooded into those nations.

How will those governments stand against Muslim pressure, when the
"moderate" Muslims know exactly which buttons to push in order to get
things their way?

Muslims comprise almost a quarter of the world's population - 1.6
billion persons.

WHAT THE PROFESSOR SAYS

You might wonder, how could it ever be that hundreds of women were
raped, robbed and beaten across Europe on New Year’s Eve by the
Syrian, Iraqi and other Islamic “refugees” who have flooded into
those nations?

Listen to this.

An Islamic professor has allegedly claimed Muslim men are allowed by
Allah to rape non-Muslim women in order to “humiliate” them.

Professor Saud Saleh – from Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt –
reportedly said rape is allowed between times of “legitimate war”
between Muslims and their enemies.

In a television interview Saleh appears to try to discourage the
purchase of slaves from Asian countries for sex, claiming Allah has
given Muslim men a “legitimate” way to have sexual relations with
slave women.
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/635942/Islam-Scholar-Saud-Saleh-
Cairo-Slavery-Muslim-Women-Pagan-ISIS-Al-Azhar-University Egypt?utm_
source=traffic.outbrain& utm_medium=traffic.outbrain&utm_term=traffic.
outbrain&utm_content=traffic.outbrain&utm_campaign=traffic.outbrain

Attacks like those already occurring are going to increase.

While they are mostly in Europe right now, you can expect them soon
to be closer to where you are.

As United States president Obama allows more and more into the USA,
it is well to keep in mind that they are not coming as refugees, nor
as immigrants. They are coming as a conquering army. And, as far as
they are concerned, they have already won the war and your women
are the spoils of that war.

WORLD-CHANGING EVENTS
POISED READY TO BREAK

, if you didn't know, events have started to happen in
Europe, USA and Australia right now that are set to change the
world overnight.

EVENTS ARE CATCHING UP
WITH THE PROPHECY

Big upheavals are coming to your life and that of your family
members.

PLAY TIME IS OVER...

Time for the grown-ups to take charge

Most people in the English-speaking parts of the world missed Putin’s speech at the Valdai conference in Sochi a few days ago, and, chances are, those who have heard of the speech didn’t get a chance to read it, and missed its importance.

Western media did their best to ignore it or to twist its meaning. Regardless of what you think or don’t think of Putin (like the sun and the moon, he does not exist for you to cultivate an opinion) this is probably the most important political speech since Churchill’s “Iron Curtain” speech of March 5, 1946.

In this speech, Putin abruptly changed the rules of the game. Previously, the game of international politics was played as follows: politicians made public pronouncements, for the sake of maintaining a pleasant fiction of national sovereignty, but they were strictly for show and had nothing to do with the substance of international politics; in the meantime, they engaged in secret back-room negotiations, in which the actual deals were hammered out.

Previously, Putin tried to play this game, expecting only that Russia be treated as an equal. But these hopes have been dashed, and at this conference he declared the game to be over, explicitly violating Western taboo by speaking directly to the people over the heads of elite clans and political leaders.

1. Russia will no longer play games and engage in back-room negotiations over trifles. But Russia is prepared for serious conversations and agreements, if these are conducive to collective security, are based on fairness and take into account the interests of each side.

2. All systems of global collective security now lie in ruins. There are no longer any international security guarantees at all. And the entity that destroyed them has a name: The United States of America.

3. The builders of the New World Order have failed, having built a sand castle. Whether or not a new world order of any sort is to be built is not just Russia’s decision, but it is a decision that will not be made without Russia.

4. Russia favors a conservative approach to introducing innovations into the social order, but is not opposed to investigating and discussing such innovations, to see if introducing any of them might be justified.

5. Russia has no intention of going fishing in the murky waters created by America’s ever-expanding “empire of chaos,” and has no interest in building a new empire of her own (this is unnecessary; Russia’s challenges lie in developing her already vast territory). Neither is Russia willing to act as a savior of the world, as she had in the past.

6. Russia will not attempt to reformat the world in her own image, but neither will she allow anyone to reformat her in their image. Russia will not close herself off from the world, but anyone who tries to close her off from the world will be sure to reap a whirlwind.

7. Russia does not wish for the chaos to spread, does not want war, and has no intention of starting one. However, today Russia sees the outbreak of global war as almost inevitable, is prepared for it, and is continuing to prepare for it. Russia does not war—nor does she fear it.

8. Russia does not intend to take an active role in thwarting those who are still attempting to construct their New World Order—until their efforts start to impinge on Russia’s key interests. Russia would prefer to stand by and watch them give themselves as many lumps as their poor heads can take. But those who manage to drag Russia into this process, through disregard for her interests, will be taught the true meaning of pain.

9. In her external, and, even more so, internal politics, Russia’s power will rely not on the elites and their back-room dealing, but on the will of the people.

To these nine points I would like to add a tenth:

10. There is still a chance to construct a new world order that will avoid a world war. This new world order must of necessity include the United States—but can only do so on the same terms as everyone else: subject to international law and international agreements; refraining from all unilateral action; in full respect of the sovereignty of other nations.

To sum it all up: play-time is over. Children, put away your toys. Now is the time for the adults to make decisions. Russia is ready for this; is the world

Share this:

CLIMATE CHANGE REJECTED BY SUPREME COURT

Obama was put into office for one reason and one reason only. He was put into office to end capitalism, private property ownership and the individual’s right to self-determination. This is all accomplished through Agenda 21 and ultimately what Patrick Wood calls technocracy. Technocracy is the take over of all energy use, thus, ultimately, all finance, through programs such as capping CO2 emission, Cap and Trade, etc.  Carbon credits, under this system is destined to become the new currency.

     When Obama was first elected, he attempted to introduce legislation into the Senate which would have reduced energy output for the United States by 80%. Even the then liberal Senate promptly rejected his proposal. That defeat set Obama into another strategy of implementation, it would have to happen piecemeal and some of the change would have to be implemented at the local level (eg California’s Cap and Trade program). However, the change for this President’s ego did not come fast enough because we are in the final year of Obama’s presidency and he has not completed his main task and HIS ENTIRE CLIMATE CHANGE INITIATIVE WAS REJECTED BY THE CONSERVATIVE MEMBERS OF THE SUPREME COURT BY A 5-4 DEFEAT!!! Scalia was the main opponent.

     This defeat of Obama’s entire climate change initiative should not be overlooked as it puts the United States in direct collision course with the United Nations’ recent COP 21 agreements in Paris, which was blocked in a 5-4 vote by the Supreme Court, only last week. Again, Justice Scalia was the main opponent. This fact alone should have provided the impetus to conduct an INDEPENDENT autopsy on Scalia’s body.

But as they say in the infomercials, there’s more….

Following the Gulf oil explosion in 2010, I wrote a seven part series entitled The Great Gulf Coast Holocaust. It was in that series that I discovered the unmistakable reason that Obama was made president.

Obama (when he was still a still a State Senator in Illinois), Valerie Jarrett and Al Gore headed a group known as the Joyce Foundation. The Joyce Foundation was designed to promote acceptance for carbon trading schemes which could be linked back to George Soros and Al Gore. The intent, as I have previously mentioned was to gain control over the entire economy. The Joyce Foundation eventually set up the Chicago Climate Exchange which was nation’s first bona fide carbon trading company. When Obama’s original carbon trading scheme was rejected in the Senate in 2009, the organization collapsed financially. But Obama’s dream of technocracy did not die with it.

The Joyce Foundation was also instrumental in bringing together NALCO, Goldman Sachs and the EPA in allowing the oil dispersant, Corexit, to be used in the Gulf even though, for health reasons, it had been banned by virtually the entire G20 nations. The conspiracy trail is mighty when it comes to Obama and his pre-presidential years and his complicity into the climate change issue. It was when Obama first became involved in the Joyce Foundation that George Soros, David Rockefeller and company backed this relative unknown for President. By the way, the late Bob Chapman and I both covered how Obama benefited from the use of Corexit through his Vanguard Investment funds (I and II). The link to this claim is listed above.

After I read volumes of material on the Joyce Foundation, it was easy to conclude that Obama was chosen to be President because he would virtually hand over the entire economy to a few wealthy bankers under the guise of climate change. The historical parallel matches why the banksters in 1912 backed Woodrow Wilson for President. The following year, the nation’s banking system was handed over the Rockefellers and their merry gang of banksters and the rest is history.

Conclusion

Scalia was the major impediment to Obama completing his legacy of ushering in technocracy. This, alone, is motive for murder. And when an autopsy is not conducted on a Supreme Court Justice, and then his “Catholic” body is cremated, we should all be more than suspicious.

http://www.thecommonsenseshow.com/2016/02/16/the-motive-behind-the-murder-of-justice-scalia/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=the-motive-behind-the-murder-of-justice-scala.

This is your chance to Save America

A Ford Dealer's Report (Please don't delete this - !)

The problems we face today are there because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living. This is exactly why Mitt Romney said that 40 -something % of the people are too dependent on the government. They have learned to work the system.

A Ford Dealer's Report From Tom Selkis' (Latham Ford) Facebook - True story at the dealership.

"I'll try to make this as short and to the point as I can. One of my salesmen here had a woman in his office yesterday wanting to lease a brand new Focus. As he was reviewing her credit application with her he noticed she was on social security disability.

He said to her you don't look like you're disabled and unable to work. She said well I'm really not. I could work if I wanted to, but I make more now than I did when I was working and got hurt (non-disabling injury).

She said the gov't sends her $1500.00 a month in 1 check. And she gets $500.00 a month on an EBT card (food stamps), and $800.00a month for rent.

Oh yeah, and 250 minutes free on her phone. That is just south of $2800.00 a month. When she was working, she was taking home about $330.00 per week. Do the math and then ask yourself why should she go back to work.

If you multiply that by millions of people, you start to realize the scope of the problem we face as a country.

Once the socialists have 51% of the population in that same scenario, we are finished.

The question is when do we cross that threshold if we haven't already, and there are not enough people working to pay enough taxes to support the non-working people?

Riots?? Be prepared to protect your homes.

She didn't lease the Focus here because the dealer down the road beat our deal by $10.00/month. Glad to know she is so frugal with her hard earned money."

How passing info onto others in America is having an effect...

PASS THIS ON TO 10

10 pass it on to their 10
100 then pass it on to their 10
1,000 then pass it on to their 10
10,000 then pass it on to their 10
100,000 then pass it on to their 10
1,000,000 then pass it on to their 10
10,000,000 then pass it on to their 10
100,000,000 then pass it on to their 10
Yes, through the power of the Internet America is becoming aware.
So, we realize this doesn't seem like we're doing much when we pass these on to our 10, but we CAN help by getting the word out. Media refuses to cover such issues.

PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO YOUR 10.

CONSTITUTIONAL FREE ZONES

1. The Constitution-Free Zone of the United States – Bill of Rights ...

www.bisbee.net/wp/bisbee-today/the-constitution-free-.

2. Border search exception - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Border_search_exception

3. Do You Live In The Constitution-Free Zone Of The US? | Techdirt

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20130212/0204532194...

100 Mile Constitution Exemption Zone = Loss of 4th Amendment Rights

July 11, 2014 Action Alerts, Agenda 21, Property Rights, Water Rights

We ran across something that greatly disturbed us as we were researching illegal immigration.  U.S. District Judge Korman has decided that the border — the area 100 miles inland from the entire U.S. border — falls under a “border exemption” and is being called a “Constitutional Exemption Zone”… all in the name of “national security”.  People that are in this area are subject to being stopped and searched at random.  So, our Constitutional Rights are being SUSPENDED in the 100-mile Constitutional Exemption Zone?  Does this affect EVERYONE?  What does this all mean, and to what can it lead?  What is being planned for all of us in this ‘exemption zone’?
The Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect us from unreasonable search and seizure, including arbitrary and random stops and searches.

U.S. CONSTITUTION – AMENDMENT IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Within 100 miles of the U.S. border, however, these rules DO NOT apply.
Constitutional Exemption Zones are being implemented by the Department of Homeland Security.  It appears that this federal agency isn’t really securing the borders but are extinguishing the Fourth Amendment Rights of over 197 million people within 100 miles of the border… and the ocean?
Secure The Republic is very concerned about this new “Constitutional Exemption Zone”.  What is REALLY going on?  Most of our metropolitan cities fall within this area.  2/3 of Americans (197.4 MILLION people) will be affected by this.  These people could find themselves WITHOUT CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.  If the 4th Amendment can be removed (the one which guards against unreasonable searches and seizures), so can the other amendments!   It appears that our borders are being eliminated and the sovereignty of our country is under attack.
This map from the ACLU is hard to beat because it shows the 100-mile “Constitutional Exemption Zone” visually, including cities which will be affected.  Take a look for yourself!  Pay special attention to the GREAT LAKES area.  We’ll comment more about that in the future…

https://www.aclu.org/know-your-rights-constitution-free-zone-map

Border search exception law and legal definition  This is the Border Exception Law that is being implemented.  The power to conduct warrantless search is referenced under 8 USCS § 1357.  This is covered in the link.
Folks, this is not about border security.  Our borders haven’t been secure in MANY years.  This is about losing state sovereignty and our constitutional rights.  This includes dropping national borders. Remember, it’s a well-orchestrated plan that has been slowly coming together and will strip us of our constitutional rights.  You’ll find that proponents of these random searches and seizures make it sound good, but we need to know where their true motivation lies…  It appears to us that we are in a type of police state.
Also, study your state constitution.  You may find that it no longer describes the boundaries of your state, effectively abolishing your state.  At last check, the only states that still lay out their boundaries in their constitutions are:  Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Nevada, New Mexico, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. Arkansas’ Constitution has been checked, and their boundary is found in Article I under “Boundaries”.  The description of the boundary for your state may be found in a different location than Article I in your particular state’s constitution.
When the State borders are no longer in the State Constitution, it is the signal that the State has lost its sovereignty.  WAKE UP AMERICA!  Is your state boundary being abolished?  Think about it another way:  would you buy a piece of property that has no legal definition?
In order to better understand this, you will need to obtain a copy of your present state constitution to see if your state legislature has removed the boundaries of your state.  The only way that these changes can be made is to change the state constitution and the U.S. Constitution.  The promoters of Regional Governance and a One-World Government know this.  It looks like STATE BOUNDARIES WILL HAVE TO BE ABOLISHED BEFORE REGIONAL GOVERNANCE and a ONE-WORLD GOVERNMENT CAN BE FULLY ENFORCED IN THE UNITED STATES.  Once this happens, there will be a centralization of power.  State boundaries have already been abolished in 33 of 50 states!
We wanted to make you aware of the dangers which we could face if we don’t abide by our U.S. Constitution, but you’ll need to do your own in-depth research on this topic.
So, we’d better beware of a Constitutional Convention (Con-Con) / Article V Amendment Convention / Convention of States that could rewrite the Constitution!
Be looking for more information in the future from us, and please forward this email to everyone you know!

Securing the blessings of liberty,

Secure the Republic

SecureTheRepublic.com
Info@SecureTheRepublic.com

TOO GOOD NOT TO PASS ON...

Railroad tracks.
 

The U.S. Standard railroad gauge (distance  between the rails) is 4 feet, 8.5 inches. That's an exceedingly odd number.

 

Why was that gauge used? Because that's the way they built them in England , and English expatriates designed the U.S. Railroads.

 

Why did the English build them like that? Because the first rail lines were built by the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways, and that's the gauge they used.

 

Why did 'they' use that gauge then? Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they had used for building wagons, which used that wheel spacing.

 

Why did the wagons have that particular Odd wheel spacing?
 

Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon wheels would break on some of the old, long distance roads in England , because that's the spacing of the wheel ruts.

 

 

So, who built those old rutted roads?
 

Imperial Rome built the first long distance roads in Europe (including England ) for their legions. Those roads have been used ever since.

 

And the ruts in the roads? Roman war chariots formed the initial ruts, which everyone else had to match for fear of destroying their wagon wheels.

 

 

Since the chariots were made for Imperial Rome , they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing. Therefore, the United States standard railroad gauge of 4 feet, 8.5 inches is derived from the original specifications for an Imperial Roman war chariot. In other words, bureaucracies live forever.

 

So the next time you are handed a specification, procedure, or process, and wonder, 'What horse's ass came up with this?' , you may be exactly right.  Imperial Roman army chariots were made just wide enough to accommodate the rear ends of two war horses .

 

Now, the twist to the story:

 

When you saw a Space Shuttle sitting on its launch pad, you will notice that there are two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters, or SRBs. The SRBs are made by Thiokol at their factory in Utah.

 

The engineers who designed the SRBs would have preferred to make them a bit larger, but the SRBs had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site. The railroad line from the factory happens to run through a tunnel in the mountains and the SRBs had to fit through that tunnel. The tunnel is slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track, as you now know, is about as wide as two horses' behinds.

 

So, a major Space Shuttle design feature of what is arguably the world's most advanced transportation system was determined over two thousand years ago by the width of a horse's ass.  And you thought being a horse's ass wasn't important!

Now you know, Horses' Asses control almost everything.

 

Explains a whole lot of stuff, doesn't it?

ASSAULT RIFLES PROTECTED UNDER 2ND AMENDMENT

Federal appeals court rules ‘assault rifles’ are protected under 2nd Amendment

Posted By: Watchman
Date: Friday, 5-Feb-2016 17:08:22

The ruling states that modern sporting rifles such as AR and AK platforms are not ‘unusual’ or especially dangerous and are, in fact, in common use in the United States as defensive weapons. The same argument applies to standard capacity magazines. These firearms are, therefore, protected under the Second Amendment for civilian use. It sent the lower court’s ruling back for reevaluation. This is a big deal. A Federal appeals court dealt a potentially serious blow to Maryland’s landmark 2013 gun control law and similar measures across the country, ruling Tuesday that a lower court was wrong when it upheld the state’s ban on assault rifles. In a 2-1 decision applauded by gun rights advocates, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit concluded that the semiautomatic weapons and high-capacity magazines banned by Maryland’s Firearm Safety Act “are in common use by law-abiding citizens.” As a result, they don’t fall under the exception to the right to bear arms that applies to “unusual” weapons such as machine guns and hand grenades, the court said. Maryland Attorney General Brian E. Frosh said Thursday that the decision “conflicts sharply with rulings of other federal appellate courts.” Frosh said he would appeal — either to the full 15-member 4th Circuit or to the U.S. Supreme Court. The lower court must now use “strict scrutiny” to uphold the Maryland law banning the rifles and magazines. This is a very difficult, but not impossible, hurdle for the court to jump. More to come. http://www.fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/federal-appeals-court-rules-assault-rifles-protected-under-2nd-amendment/152959#more-152959